The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - September 5, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: 1/9th scale flying C-17
DropBear    3/24/2008 10:59:52 PM

This 1/9th scale radio-controlled C-17 model was built in the United Kingdom . It was built as the centerpiece of a 15 program television series produced in the U.K. for the Home and Leisure satellite TV channel.

Built with the aid of three friends, it took one year to build and is powered with 4 Jetcat P-120 turbines with a total thrust of 108 lbs. The model weighs over 250 lbs fueled, and carries 12.5 liters (3.3 US gallons) of 95% kerosene and 5% turbine oil fuel. Other details include 5 Futaba PCM receivers, 16 battery packs (93 cells), 20 Futaba servos, on board air compressor, electro/pneumatic retracts, etc. Wingspan is 20 feet 8 inches, and the top of the FIN is 74 inches (6 feet 2 inches) above the ground. Takeoff weight is 264 lbs.

The rear cargo doors open and they drop an r/c jeep on a pallet, as well as 2 free-fall r/c parachutists.

The model also has smoke systems both of the inboard turbines, and uses a 2.4 GHz data link to provide real-time data to a laptop computer on the ground while in flight. This data includes airspeed, turbine RPM, EGT, fuel consumption, etc. Built mainly from balsa and ply, with many glass and carbon fiber moldings to reduce weight. It is covered in fiberglass and epoxy resin. Complete with retractable landing gear and pneumatically operated flaps.


Pics to follow...

 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

DropBear       3/24/2008 11:02:07 PM

 

 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Should have invited them to submit for the KC-X!   3/25/2008 6:00:20 AM
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag    Wow!   3/25/2008 6:55:10 AM
Nice!
When you take your hobby that seriously (willing to commit that much time, effort, and money),
then you're just one step away from going into the UAV business!
 
Quote    Reply

EW3       3/27/2008 7:10:10 PM
DB, any idea what it sounds like? 
Do they need a GPS system?  Might be able to help....
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag    hey, what about...   3/27/2008 7:57:33 PM
Too bad there isn't much of a demand for 1/9th scale AFVs,
because it would be even cooler to watch it land,
only to have a another guy or two with more remote controls drive an Abrams, a Bradley, or a Paladin, or MLRS out of its belly...
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear       3/27/2008 8:59:31 PM
DB, any idea what it sounds like? 
Do they need a GPS system?  Might be able to help....
 
Vroooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom. 
 
Nah, no idea Skipper. Haven't seen/heard a video for it yet.
 
No doubt they have one somewhere on youtube.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear    doggtag   3/27/2008 9:02:22 PM
Probably not much demand due to scale, complexity, cost and from what I have heard...a requirement to inform the CAA when they launch it. Apparently it is classed as a UAV and not an r/c model due to its size.
 
I am not sure if you need to lodge flightplans in the UK for ultralight sized craft? Hmmm.
 
Curious.
 
 
Quote    Reply

earlm    These aircraft should be regulated   3/27/2008 11:26:30 PM
I admire the men who built this for their skill and dedication but the military and illicit uses of such aircraft are obvious.  They could be crashed into civilian or military aircraft on takeoff or landing and could carry useful quantities of radiological or biological weapons.  I hope that true hobbyists are not inhibited but there are too many wackos out there.  At the least RC aircraft above 50kg should be registered and a background check to make sure the operators don't have any terrorist connections.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       3/30/2008 7:44:39 PM

 At the least RC aircraft above 50kg should be registered and a background check to make sure the operators don't have any terrorist connections.

I fail to understand why people would forward suggestions like that - they obviously do not work.  Firstly, "terrorists connections" is an awfully vague term, and would be equally difficult to prove.  Secondly, those who mean to take illegal action with their UAV's simply wouldn't register them!

It is the parallel to banning handguns in the UK.  It hurts honest sportsmen, and it certainly has not reduced gun crime.
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag    not terrorists, but drug traffickers?   3/31/2008 12:40:08 PM
If we're going to be raising thoughts of terrorist UAV kamikazes,
then why not consider a more obvious, but just as insidious, use: carry several dozen to a few hundred pounds of cocaine, marijuana, opium, of whatever contraband trips yer fancy?
 
I remember this British crime series from ages ago (on PBS before BBC America had its own channels, late 1980s-ish),
where a group of jewel thieves were smuggling stolen gems across the Channel, using RC aircraft, with minor course adjustment being by waypoint controllers in boats every so many km.
 
Seems that metal aircraft like Cessnas and Piper Cubs might be detectable flying across the US border with few bales of weed or several dozen kilos of coke or heroin or whatever,
but a composite construction RC aircraft with a range of several dozen km and the ability to carry even only a dozen kilos would be well worth its expense to the drug runners...?
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy