Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Is US were right to develop F22 and F35?
french stratege    2/11/2007 3:52:45 PM
I think that US did a mistake by developping both of them. F22 is overspecified vs any threat and quite expensive F35 is too light Making two programs means double R&D cost.40 B$ in R&D is equivalent to 300 F22. Should US should have make an intermediate fighter between F22 and F35? I mean a twin engine about 2*10/11 tons trust with stealthiness and supercruise of F22 (but with a reduced supercruise speed to mach 1,4) and polyvalent as F35 with bigger internal bays able to handle 2 AM9x more in a second bay like F22 OR two more AMRAAM . US tried to replicate F15/F16 combination. In the sixties US relied on F4 for all services: a medium/heavy polyvalent fighter. What is your thinking about that?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5
KlubMarcus       2/16/2007 3:40:11 AM
Anyway, back to topic. Yes, developing the F-22 and F-35 was a great idea because it forces all the other lesser nations in the world to shift manpower, money, time, and planning in order to adapt to those two planes and what the USAF will do with them. Just when the world thinks it's figured us out, we knock over the apple cart. By the time the world can deal with those two planes, we'll have incredible upgrades for them or a new aircraft that surpasses them.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics