It all happens at the speed of light, cretin.

 

Herald 

Nope Herald . Your AWACS 's man needs to press on some buttons and switches first . Don 't take me for a fool .

 

Leroy , here is a clue :

h*tp://www.thalesraytheon.com/uploads/tx_templavoila/HA100.JPG

 

Cheers .

Trying to TELL ME how telemetry and data sharing works? Go pound sand mama's boy. Look up the definition of NODE.

 

By the way.........   moron;

 

Bluewings in fantasyland 

 

The HA-100 was covered in February. I was rolling in the aisles with the lies you tried to post then.

 

One more thing......

 

h*tp://www.thalesraytheon.com/uploads/tx_templavoila/HA100.JPG.

 

See the name? Whatever was done RIGHT in that bi-static multi-NODE [SARCASM AGAIN] low altitude smear track blob detector radar was courtesy of RAYTHEON, an AMERICAN outfit..

 

Which is about as French as French fries; which best evidence shows ORIGINALLY was a Belgian dish by way of SPAIN..

 

Have a nice evening as you choke on your pommes frites.

 

Herald

 

.  

 

 

 

 

Keep on trolling kid... you aren't fooling anyone here.

 

We have all seen your little act before.

 

You come here claiming you want a reasonable discussion, then you make a fool of yourself by misunderstanding everything, demand everyone explain everything to you and "prove" it all... then the next day you "forget" everything people were nice enough to explain to you so that you can return to your original stupidity. 

 

You claim this isn't about France vs the USA, but that is what every single one of these threads turns into because that is exactly what you want to turn it into.

 

If the thread goes on long enough that you get backed into a corner, you just start making up wonderful new technologies and tactics for the Rafale that generally don't even make sense.

 

You are a fanboy and a liar.  I have seen you prove as much countless times.  

 

Grow up

 

What the F-22 should have done was to send to the Prowler in real time :

1) the coordinate of the target (interferrometry)

 

It's not hard at all to do that verbally.  "Spike, Grumble, two-four-zero at thirty".  That tells you there is an emitter, the type of emitter (SA-10/S-300), and its coordinates (azimuth and distance).  The EA-6B crew knows what frequencies that type of SAM operates at, and link-16 wouldn't tell you things like bandwidth or frequency anyway.  The F-22 has no problem precisely identifying the locations of both the EA-6B and of the SAM site -- they both show up on its situation display and it will tell the pilot everything he needs to know in terms of relative coordinates.

 

Of course, if you were using Link-16, you would be emitting constantly.  The F-22 only emits when it needs to.  Less efficiently?  Perhaps, but it is in total EMCON the rest of the time.

 

But the F-22 talked verbally to the Prowler 's crew about a SAM site being "somewhere there" , Bravo !

Next time , use a Rafale to talk to your Prowler , you won 't be disapointed .

 

No, the F-22 can tell the Prowler exactly where the threat is and what type threat it is.  The Rafale couldn't get anywhere close to the SAM site without being detected, unlike the F-22.  So what the Rafale would say to the Prowler is more like "Sam, sam, engaged defensive!".  Not qute so useful.

 

As always, your clear explanations are a delight to read, not to mention I love your wit, too.  "Not quite so useful," indeed!  Herald and Leroy, you're on target as usual.

 

It all depends on who will have the best electronic warfare in my opinion.

 

I have a suspicion/hunch that there are future technologies possible for electronic warfare that could turn out to be more important than stealth.

 

 

 

It all depends on who will have the best electronic warfare in my opinion.

I have a suspicion/hunch that there are future technologies possible for electronic warfare that could turn out to be more important than stealth.

Bash as much as you can I do not care .

 

I see that as soon as Herald spot the name Raytheon , the best part of a radar must come from them and the worse part from the poor french who cannot understand a thing . Well , that 's charming and very clever Herald , not . You really spit on everything as long as it comes from me , forgetting that you will look like a fool to the knowledgeable posters .

The HA-100 radar works as intented , you want it or not .

 

h*tp://www.twine.com/item/11cnb2mvn-48n/defense-technology-international-october-2007

 

Unlike you , I provide links and studies .

Leroy had nothing interesting to say .

 

 

 

gf , we 're in 2008 .

 

Cheers .

I gave a link, dummy. It wasn't exactly for your benefit as it was a remindert to others of exactly what an ignoranht LIAR you are. 

 

I do mention Raytheon A LOT. One of these days you might catch on.

The HA-100 works exactly as described in plain English. LockMart was parading around a system called Silent Sentry that suffered similar limitations, If you want.to know who the real experts in this type of radar are, how about making a trip to Georgia Tech, cretin? They teach all kinds of weird and wonderful things at the North Avenue Trade School,-from how to build to specified design a multiNODE _{there is that word again!] passive radar system that WORKS, to how to push a mop properly..I suggest you try the mop pushing curriculum.

 

Look "tankboy" I already took you to the woodshed about EW, the ASTER, how rockets work in general, how telemetry works, I even finally ripped you a new one when you LIED about the Leclerc armor package- a subject where you claimed to be an expert and I knew I was not, but at the end demonstrated I knew far more in FACT than you ever dreamed in your Steel Beasts fantasies. Its just plain to the old timers here that you are a google boy who sees something on the internet and you come bombing in here, like the fool you are with your latest pronouncements to showe the rest of us that you know something that will one up somebody. This is nopt rational b4havior to keep subjecting yourself to this kind of publuc humilation

 

Are you really that sick or are you just that STUPID?.

 

I mean just read the gibberish I highlighted in yellow that you wrote. Its stark ravintg lunacy mixed with your usual lies and fantasies.

 

The chief lie you write of which is that anybody would waste their time talking to you of all people about US air exercises such as REDFLAG where the AdA did not participate all that much-certainly not in the way of IAD suppression.

 

They, the French actually came to LEARN from is not to teach..

 

You would do well to emulate them. In the meantime YOU continue to be a disgrace to France, as a man (actually a boy) with no honor and of no worth.

 

 Herald

 

 

Even if this were true, you're still completely missing the point.

 

The F-22, even after it has expended all of its ordnance, is still a very useful asset because it can fly unchallenged into SAM envelopes.  There, it can pinpoint SAM sites and hand off targets to SEAD platforms before the SEAD platforms can detect them on their own -- and, more importantly, before the SAM can detect the SEAD platform.  Rafale simply cannot do that.

 

And, again, as far as this whole network technology nonsense you keep misunderstanding: the reason the F-22 does not implement Link-16 transmission is because Link-16 transmission requires constant emissions.  It is not stealthy.   A quick burst of voice communications, for all that you ignorantly deride it, is far harder to detect and impossible to track, compared to a network protocol operating over RF.

      Going back to the stealth/electronic warfare question... Don't think for a moment that the F-22 is lacking in electronic warfare capabilities because it is stealthy.  It would make a better video game if the F-22 had some obvious weakness that could be exploited, but that is simply not the case.

 

      The F-22 has a world class electronic warfare system that is absolutely second to none.  The details of the F-22's capabilities in these areas are very rarely discussed because of classification issues.  The F-22 is a US-only product that is not offered for export at any price.  Because of this, the US does not feel the need to publicize its capabilities in sensitive areas.  It is better to let the opposition wonder.  It is public information that its primary philosophy does not call for active jamming because such an approach is simply not necessary.  Nonetheless, it has the ability to employ active countermeasures if necessary and that capability will continue to grow with technology or if a plausible threat emerges. 

As usual when Herald is against the wall , he goes 'bla-bla" . That facilitates my task .

Make no mistake people , Herald never won an argument with me on Tanks .

 

My answer to him will be short : bla-bla .

 

Fortunatly for the discussion , Phaid is making sense .

Leroy :