The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Fighters, Bombers and Recon Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter
mike14    2/15/2005 2:24:35 PM
Who would win.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26   NEXT
majestikflow    Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter   7/27/2009 11:52:35 PM
in simulated dog fights one F-22 has taken out 6 eurofighters. the euro can lock on there missles to the F-22 in time.....hence the stealth.
 
Quote    Reply

majestikflow    Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter   7/27/2009 11:53:10 PM
...amke that they cant lock on in time
 
Quote    Reply

majestikflow    Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter   7/27/2009 11:54:40 PM
also not only has the F-22 taken out 6 eurofighters. the F-22 took out 6 F/A 18 super hornets....
 
Quote    Reply

majestikflow    Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter   7/27/2009 11:57:09 PM
XTC the F-22 hasn't been cancelled. It has been suspended until we get back the GOP to knock sense into these pathetic liberals in power now.
 
Quote    Reply

majestikflow    Subject: F-22 VS. Eurofighter   7/27/2009 11:57:22 PM
XTC the F-22 hasn't been cancelled. It has been suspended until we get back the GOP to knock sense into these pathetic liberals in power now.
 
Quote    Reply

Rufus       7/28/2009 2:32:40 AM
"Another Blue Wings?"
 
So it seems...
 
Or maybe this is the guy that told bluewings all the various fanboy science fiction we have since had to educate him about.
 
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Rufus       7/28/2009 2:37:43 AM
There is really too much fanboy science fiction in these posts for me to try to correct it all, and I have really lost faith that it will do any good on people who show up thinking they know everything and yet don't even understand the basics...

 

 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       7/28/2009 2:58:13 AM




Another Blue Wings?



 



Herald











What's wrong with this guy?

  Nothing, kid.

  And is this topic subject the posters or  F-22 VS. Eurofighter?

 This subject is now your incompetence.

  Because so far i have seen as much as mis-informed flaming as proper information and then, there is the small problem of their interpretation, like posting links on technologies in developement at their earliest stage and claiming them as already acquiered capabilities.

Or fake French technologies?

  I wonder if people are genuily interested on the subject of just here for trolling.

I am interested in truth. What is your excuse?

  Please stick to the subject, i'm not interested the slightest on your opinions on other posters, or myself for that matter.
For your opinions to  matter you must know what you discuss.
   So for the time being, we will wait for the informations on full USA HOBS/HMDS LOAL over 360*X360* demonstrated capabilities until you provide us with them Thank you.
 
If you need it, poster.
 
 

Now be silent.



 
Quote    Reply

Wingman       7/28/2009 3:47:25 AM
@Herald12345  
 
 For your info you just demonstrated TWO thing:
 
1) You dont bother reading other posts, or else you wouldn't havew bothered with outdated infos about test-firing in HOBS modes of target from the FRONT hemishpere (Even a Magic II could do this).
 
2) You're arrogant to the point of thinking everyone is playing in the boyz court and you know everything, at the way you talk about european technologies you visibly don't.
 
  Bad news then, you're the one in need of a proper reducation.
 
   READ AGAIN:
 
  Come back when the USA will have demonstrated a succesful test-firing against a target situated BEHIND the shooter at the time of firing.
 
  Otherwise said; a follower, detected, tracked and designated while flying behind the shooter...
 
  AGAIN: The world FIRST achieved by MBDA is clearly an indication that you are living in fantasyland believing you got a true 36)*X360* firing envelop when nobody actualy does, nor the F-35 nor any other aircrafts..
 
   NOW: Go and do your home work now, BOY.
 
Quote    Reply

Rufus       7/28/2009 3:54:52 AM
"Why? Because everyone knows that european technology is superior, always has been, and the same applies to fighter aircraft."
 
Explains why so many European airforces are made up of US aircraft... and why the various European fighters have done so well on the export market.
 
 
Really this trolling is a waste of time.  I am sorry if you feel insecure because nobody has bought your favorite airplane but making a fool of yourself on the internet is hardly a remedy.
 
 

 
Quote    Reply

Rufus       7/28/2009 3:59:15 AM
"HOB and HOBS are two different things"
 
Oh really?
 
And why don't you break it down for us kid?
 
Tell us what these Acronyms mean...
 

 
Quote    Reply

Wingman       7/28/2009 4:19:24 AM
Rufus       7/28/2009 3:54:52 AM
 I am sorry if you feel insecure because nobody has bought your favorite airplane but making a fool of yourself on the internet is hardly a remedy.
 
    Troll-Wannabe Posters: A troll is defined as a
poster who comes to these boards with the sole purpose of flaming, disrupting,
antagonizing, provoking and/or abusing existing board members...
 
  I strongly suggest you read the posts and study the subject in details before accusing anyone of trolling, for the rest a better understanding of the subject seems to be a necessity.
 
  We are FAR from feeling insecure, if information about what is developed over here doesn't hit the right nerves in your side of the pound it's not our problem...
 
   We inform and correct innacuracies when needed.
 
   It is easy to post a video and an article while not complying with the poster's demands and i ask you guys again, to show us a succesful test-firing of a target detected, tracked, designated while situated behind the shooter.
 
  So far all US test-firing have been done while the target was situated within the shooter's sensors PoV, meaning front sector.
 
  What you come up with is LOAL/High Off Boresight capabilties, NOT full HOBS and 360*X360* sensor area.
 
  Nearly all in-service current IR AAM have this capability (appart for the older and less maneuvrable that is).
 
   What was demonstrated is the NEXT step, meaning not only HOB bot also use of onboard sensor or remote detection of the target beyhound the aircraft wing line BEFORE launch.
 
   As for the Sci-Fi legends on F-35 we still wait to see one guy capable of making the distinction between A2A and A2G capabilties, the fancy technologies developed in both side of the atlantic, such as shape recognition algotythms are not ported to the A2A role just yet.
 
  Some people should read more technical articles and less commercials, this way they would be able to understand them better...
 
  So the point in regard to this particular topic would be, a Typhoon equiped with ASRAAM would have a larger firing envelop in a fureball (without risk of hitting a friendly or simply missing after a target's evasive) than a F-22 simply because the AAM will have a better cueing  over a much larger firing area.
 
  If you are alone vs a target you might want to use the AAM HOB capabilties but you still will have to CUE it to the target even in LOAL mode, the firing area depends on sensors other than that of the missile.
 
  Now please check in your information.
 
  Thanks
 
 
03/05/2009
20060908raaflight.jpg
2009-03-05 ASRAAM RAAF ENG.doc
 author : Jean Dupont
In a world first for an Air Force and an infra-red guided missile, Air Combat Group (ACG) of the Royal Australian Air Force has successfully carried out the first in-service 'Lock After Launch' firing of an ASRAAM (Advanced short-range air-to-air missile) at a target located behind the wing-line of the ?shooter? aircraft. The firing was conducted from an F/A-18 fighter aircraft, at low level and typical fighter speed, at a target located behind the fighter at a range in excess of 5km. The result was a direct hit on the target.

The engagement simulated a "chase down" situation by an enemy fighter and successfully demonstrated the potential for an all-round self protection capability with the ASRAAM. This capability is inherent on all platforms that provide pre-launch 'over the shoulder' designation information such as F/A-18, Eurofighter Typhoon and F-35 JSF.

Commenting on the firing, a representative from Air Combat Group said ?this demonstration of ASRAAM capability is a major step forward for the RAAF and greatly increases the lethality of ACG?s F/A-18 fleet. It is a credit to the RAAF-MBDA-DSTO team who worked together to deliver this capability edge to the fleet.?

ASRAAM entered service with the RAAF in July 2004. To provide unique levels of in service support, facilities were established in Adelaide injecting some AUS million into the South Australian economy over a period of 6 years. The facilities are located at the Defence Science & Technology Organisation at Edinburgh (SA) and at BAE Systems at Edinburgh Park. These facilities provide the in-country capability to support the front line equipment.

Having entered service with the Royal Air Force in 2002, and deployed on Tornado, Typhoon, and shortly F-35 JSF, the ASRAAM programme has provided a unique opportunity for information exchange between the respective air forces, government departments and scientific organisations.
link
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345       7/28/2009 4:49:05 AM

@Herald12345  

 For your info you just demonstrated TWO thing:

1) You dont bother reading other posts, or else you wouldn't havew bothered with outdated infos about test-firing in HOBS modes of target from the FRONT hemishpere (Even a Magic II could do this).

I am well aware of what you claim. I am also well aware that you claim a distinction without meaning here. If you looked at the EAGLE launch the missile was fired at the drone AFTER it entered into the aft arc of the aircraft EAGLE  in the turn. This shows that you don't observe evidence given you very well. it also shows me that you don't read at all. I supplied you with a year old discussion of DASS on the F-35 and the testing profiles in progress. Your brag is less useful than the cooperative aircraft guidance tests that the USAF conducted last year to validate BVR CEC engagement with AMRAAM. 

2) You're arrogant to the point of thinking everyone is playing in the boyz court and you know everything, at the way you talk about european technologies you visibly don't.

Well I am arrogant. But that is better than being ill informed as to the technology.

  Bad news then, you're the one in need of a proper reducation.

 Its spelled education. Get one.

   READ AGAIN:

 I don't need too, fanboy. I have you pegged as a 17 year old without proper technical training.

  Come back when the USA will have demonstrated a succesful test-firing against a target situated BEHIND the shooter at the time of firing.
 
Look at the video again, boy.  

  Otherwise said; a follower, detected, tracked and designated while flying behind the shooter...

Where? If you need one in a pass through multiplane knife fight then we will blow you out of the sky.

  AGAIN: The world FIRST achieved by MBDA is clearly an indication that you are living in fantasyland believing you got a true 36)*X360* firing envelop when nobody actualy does, nor the F-35 nor any other aircrafts..

 When? That farce was an advertising spiel. When you wake yo to what DAS is child you will see what errors you make.
 
 
I can dish out the propaganda too. BOY.

   NOW: Go and do your home work now,
 
Better learn some respect for your elders and BETTERS, kid.
 

Read some more, and learn about those with whom you deal, child.

Seriously, READ before you get yourself embarrassed. 
 
Quote    Reply

Wingman       7/28/2009 6:49:18 AM
Please:
Instead ot adopting this attitude and being generaly negative, SHOW us a US demonstrateed capability equivalent to these, we're still waiting and i dont see where we are embarassing ourself considering the lack of response from you.
 
  Now i wont even bother replying until we got a reply worth reading, all we got instead of what we ask for are insults and patronising tones.
 
  It is not too much asking is it?
 
  SO AGAIN: Can we have a US repport on succesful test-firing of a target situated BEYHOUND the wing line at firing time?
 
  As far as the rest of the world is conscerned, the world's first was achieved only recently with an ASRAMM from an AAF F-18, and we provided with the link to the article. Cheers. 
 
Quote    Reply

Wingman       7/28/2009 7:26:29 AM

"HOB and HOBS are two different things"

 

Oh really?

 

And why don't you break it down for us kid?


 

Tell us what these Acronyms mean...

 





Break it down as for AAM maneuvrability off the rail and sighting capabilties for cueing; involving targeting and tracking which are depending on the shooter's sensor capabilities.
 
  Apparently you guys are dreaming about a 360*X360* sighting (HMDS), targeting and designation capability based on the assumption that the famous shape recognition algorythms used on their most elementary form today in the A2G role are being ported to the A2A role.
 
  Well too bad it's just a dream and that this capability is still in the labs, everyone is actively working at it and the US havent more of a clue than the rest today on how to solve the problems they are faced with, the maximum achived worldwile is just passed the wing line with "potential" use of HMDS in the future.
 
  In SHORT you are mystaking AAM High Off Boresight maneuvrability to HMDS High Off Boresight Sighting.
 
  One doesn't handle the equations relative to fast changing shapes/positions the same way as for a near-static ground based vehicles, when it comes to 3D and fast moving targets it takes a lot more than rough computing power...
 
  Now, next time you read one of L-M commercials, try and ask yourself for which role they claim "It will be able to" or another form of capability they claim they have today, because as far was we know, many of you are not discening reality from fiction.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy