Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
United Kingdom Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: BAE Systems Nightjar UCAV
RM-Nod    6/16/2005 9:30:45 AM
Since no one elses is posting it... Aviation Week & Space Technology Secret Stealthy UCAV Project in U.K. 06/13/2005 11:25:26 AM By Douglas Barrie U.K. UCAV BAE Systems is working on a classified low-radar-observable UCAV project, dubbed Nightjar, for the British Defense Ministry. The sensitive program has been underway for several years, and an airframe may already have been built. The unmanned combat air vehicle program follows on from the company's Testbed low-observable-aircraft work, which saw a full-scale airframe built and tested on the company's radar cross-section range. Nightjar incorporates low-observable features, with the design also including an internal weapons bay. Alongside funding the BAE work, the Defense Ministry is also looking at engine requirements for this class of UCAV. A number of work packages, or tasks, are underway for the ministry. Systems and subsystems work has included testing on BAE's RCS range. Work packages on the program include design, aerodynamics and in-service performance. The activity is being undertaken at BAE's Warton site in the north of England, with a similar level of secrecy to that of the Testbed/Replica program. The latter effort ended in 1999. BAE has shown a number of notional UCAV illustrations, with a blended wing-body airframe. Wind tunnel work has also been carried out examining low-observable UCAV designs, with particular interest in internal weapons carriage and deployment. The effort is also drawing on other stealth research carried out by BAE on behalf of the Defense Ministry. This includes work into both visual and infrared signature reduction, covered in part by the company's Chameleon program. This project included fitting a Hawk jet trainer with light-emitting diodes in an attempt to diminish the contrast between the aircraft and the background against which it was being flown. Infrared engine suppression technology has also been flown, at least on a Hawk. The Nightjar program, suggest industry sources, has a twofold purpose. The first is to ensure the technology base for the development of a low-observable UCAV; the second is to provide leverage should the U.K. decide to participate in any comparable U.S. effort. Testbed was used in attempting to influence U.S. thinking in providing access to sensitive technology on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Access, however, remains a considerable issue. Britain is the only level-one partner on the F-35. The ministry is looking at a UCAV as a potential element of its future long-range strike capability. Initially enshrined in Air Staff (Target) 425, this requirement's latest guise is the Future Offensive Air Capability. This has looked at a force mix of crewed aircraft, UCAVs and cruise missiles, to be introduced around 2015-20. What remains in doubt, however, is just how much funding there is to meet the requirement, and the pace at which it will be made available. EARLIER THIS YEAR the British Defense Ministry joined the Pentagon's Joint Unmanned Combat Air Systems program. Work from Nightjar will inevitably inform the U.K. participation. While the ministry remains publicly noncommittal as to whether it will pursue a European or a U.S. path in any eventual acquisition of a UCAV, all indications are that U.S. route is far more likely. The joint work will conclude with "live and virtual manned and unmanned assets from both nations operating in a networked coalition warfare scenario." It's possible that a Nightjar UCAV could take part in the exercise in 2009. A UCAV demonstrator effort was also proposed by the government and industry's Aerospace and Innovation Growth Team report. It suggested an "Autonomous Systems Technology Demonstrator" as one of six themed demonstrator programs. But it remains to be seen whether--should this program go ahead--it would succeed Nightjar, be run in parallel or be based on BAE's work so far.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Worcester    RE:BAE Systems Nightjar UCAV   6/16/2005 4:43:08 PM
"virtual manned or autonomous" i.e. unmanned may be without any human interface at all. I had heard there was a lot of interest from the success of Brimstone - specifically the target discriminator or "tactical brain". Couple that with some of the Planar Array technologies - which are to all intents and purposes an "electronic eyeball" which really sees and remembers the target image - and you've got radical departure. A device which sees better than we do, doesnt get confused by old-styel counter-measures and picks targets autonomously. The US current UCAV X-program completed a fully autonomous "hands off" takeoff, attack and landing last October. If you look at the sub-contractors, you will find a BAe Systems sub was already in charge of databus/systems integration back in 1999. Not surprised they ran a parallel program at Wharton.
 
Quote    Reply

EW3    RE:BAE Systems Nightjar UCAV - Worcester   6/16/2005 5:03:37 PM
Just curious, when you say BAE was in charge of the databus, do you mean a company like Sanders or Lockheed (who bought sanders) or another BAE (who bought Lockheed electronics) sub.
 
Quote    Reply

perfectgeneral    RE:Nightjar UAV AEW   6/17/2005 7:40:03 AM
Autonomous may be the way to go with unarmed systems like organic naval AEW. The mission is pretty predictable and crewed systems are in a position to defend the autonomous asset.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy    RE:Nightjar UAV AEW   6/19/2005 2:59:04 PM
I have been away for 9 days so don't know if this has already been noted - but FOAS has now been cancelled as according to Janes, in favour of FCFC (upgrading current manned aircraft), and introducing a fleet of offensive UAV's. FOAS was apparantly cancelled as it was going nowhere, as everybody knew it would be shot down in flames due to cost reasons when the need is for basic army suplies such as body armour.
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy