Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: worst special forces
bob the brit    1/8/2007 11:09:31 PM
here we go, don't see this one too often, what do you think is the worst special forces currently operating (wonder if we'll see any reverse pecker competitions i.e. "my country's SF are worse than yours") but you can be serious if you want... oh and don't be a nob end and just use this to slag off other people (oh what have i begun?) (e, there's no more smileys, and i wanted to use that one with the puzzled... distraught look)
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5   NEXT
smitty237       1/8/2007 11:55:43 PM
Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       1/8/2007 11:58:01 PM

Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 


Yeah, but I don't think Spetsnaz Alpha handled the Beslan incident. From everything I have heard about Russian Spetsnaz is that they are extremely tough mother's, but aren't technically profecient at all.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       1/8/2007 11:59:36 PM




Didn't realize there were that many in Africa, are they any good? Any idea on their selection?



 



Yeah, South Africa has some awesome, awesome SOF (don't know any specific units though, but I watched a show on Discover Times detailing a few months inside a South African Tier 1 HRT unit)...I have heard that one of the SA operators basically started the whole PMC thing.




as i said before GOP a lot of african SF's are really just presidential or head of state protection units (not to say they're not elite) but they just don't handle the same area of responsibilty as many western and asian SF units. however, there are some fairly credible SF units among them, SDF is a competent fighting force, and other african SF units hold a vast number of indigenous persons in their ranks so they have been brought up in the land and know how to survive


I have heard that African SOF is full of mercenaries (ie: X - SAS), but as far as homegrown SOF operators, not sure about their profeciency.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       1/9/2007 12:00:48 AM




Didn't realize there were that many in Africa, are they any good? Any idea on their selection?



 



Yeah, South Africa has some awesome, awesome SOF (don't know any specific units though, but I watched a show on Discover Times detailing a few months inside a South African Tier 1 HRT unit)...I have heard that one of the SA operators basically started the whole PMC thing.




not true i'm afraid... if we look back in history you can see many units that could be considered PMC's. hell the swiss were always hired during the wars in europe back in the 1500's and 1600's. and how long has the swiss vatican gaurd been around (surely you can consider them a form of PMC) if you ask me the forming of PMC's was more a coincidence than a founded and formed proffession



Very good point. I have even read that merc's were used during the battle of Thermopylae! I was referring to the modern PMC (like Dyncorp, blackwater, etc).
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       1/9/2007 12:04:51 AM




Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 




Yeah, but I don't think Spetsnaz Alpha handled the Beslan incident. From everything I have heard about Russian Spetsnaz is that they are extremely tough mother's, but aren't technically profecient at all.


can't say i've had any hands on experiance with the ruskie's in my time, what with the cold war on and all. however smitty you bring good examples to the table
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       1/9/2007 12:08:20 AM
I'd also say that the Russians sort of got a bad rap for the whole Moscow theatre op...I mean, the gas they used killed a few civilians, but it also put the terrorist to sleep (and I read that Alpha put *ALOT* of rounds into the "sleeping" terrorist) and saved many lives. It was sort of a tossup...
 
option a) use the gas, kill a few innocents, kill the terrorists, save alot of hostages
 
option b) don't use the gas, rush the theatre, run a very high risk of Chechens igniting their bombs.
 
option c) wait on the Chechens to kill the hostages
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       1/9/2007 12:09:09 AM








Didn't realize there were that many in Africa, are they any good? Any idea on their selection?





 





Yeah, South Africa has some awesome, awesome SOF (don't know any specific units though, but I watched a show on Discover Times detailing a few months inside a South African Tier 1 HRT unit)...I have heard that one of the SA operators basically started the whole PMC thing.







not true i'm afraid... if we look back in history you can see many units that could be considered PMC's. hell the swiss were always hired during the wars in europe back in the 1500's and 1600's. and how long has the swiss vatican gaurd been around (surely you can consider them a form of PMC) if you ask me the forming of PMC's was more a coincidence than a founded and formed proffession





Very good point. I have even read that merc's were used during the battle of Thermopylae! I was referring to the modern PMC (like Dyncorp, blackwater, etc).


i'd say modern PMC's evolved from the past, you can't really say one company came first because you argue that another came before them and on and on untill you end up at the beginning of human warfare. as long as there have been weaker armies there have been purchased alliances
 
Quote    Reply

joe6pack       1/9/2007 12:11:30 AM

Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 



I think this comes from a very loose definition of "special".  In some nations it seems "special forces" can consist of any unit that can be trusted with 20 rounds of ammunition a man and not try to over throw el-presidente.
Then you have nations that seem to "mass produce" special forces - see Russian Speznatz, North Korean (whatever they call ems), heck the Iraq Republican Guard was supposed to be an elite force wasn't it?  I think this list could get pretty long is with a wide variety capability versus incompotence.
 
Then you have the media / hollywood special forces that believe anyone in a beret is triple secret double probation ninja like our friend Braddock.   Since I haven't vented on this for at least two day... Damn who ever it was that decided the US Army should wear berets!    We are not the firking French or some other Euro army.. 
 
Then you have the general sort of acknowledged special forces like the SAS or US special forces.
 
Then you have those folks that say the above are still too big to really be special and you run into all these really tiny groups with strange names (or various letters) and people that go off to write books about how cool they are but can't really talk about it.
 
So which group are we talking about in the reverse pecker competition? 
 
Quote    Reply

DynamicTraveler       1/9/2007 12:21:56 AM




Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 





I think this comes from a very loose definition of "special".  In some nations it seems "special forces" can consist of any unit that can be trusted with 20 rounds of ammunition a man and not try to over throw el-presidente.

Then you have nations that seem to "mass produce" special forces - see Russian Speznatz, North Korean (whatever they call ems), heck the Iraq Republican Guard was supposed to be an elite force wasn't it?  I think this list could get pretty long is with a wide variety capability versus incompotence.

 

Then you have the media / hollywood special forces that believe anyone in a beret is triple secret double probation ninja like our friend Braddock.   Since I haven't vented on this for at least two day... Damn who ever it was that decided the US Army should wear berets!    We are not the firking French or some other Euro army.. 

 

Then you have the general sort of acknowledged special forces like the SAS or US special forces.

 

Then you have those folks that say the above are still too big to really be special and you run into all these really tiny groups with strange names (or various letters) and people that go off to write books about how cool they are but can't really talk about it.

 

So which group are we talking about in the reverse pecker competition? 


You beat me to the punch, with the Iraqi Republican Guard.  I don't know if they where SOF, but they were supposedly the elite soilders.

 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       1/9/2007 12:29:23 AM




Believe or not the Russians also come to mind.  Russian Interior Ministry SOF units experienced a couple of botched operations as well.  The hostage rescue operations against Chechen terrorist at the Moscow theater and the school in Beslan are two prime examples.  A lot of mistakes were made and a lot of civilians died because of them. 





I think this comes from a very loose definition of "special".  In some nations it seems "special forces" can consist of any unit that can be trusted with 20 rounds of ammunition a man and not try to over throw el-presidente.

Then you have nations that seem to "mass produce" special forces - see Russian Speznatz, North Korean (whatever they call ems), heck the Iraq Republican Guard was supposed to be an elite force wasn't it?  I think this list could get pretty long is with a wide variety capability versus incompotence.

 

Then you have the media / hollywood special forces that believe anyone in a beret is triple secret double probation ninja like our friend Braddock.   Since I haven't vented on this for at least two day... Damn who ever it was that decided the US Army should wear berets!    We are not the firking French or some other Euro army.. 

 

Then you have the general sort of acknowledged special forces like the SAS or US special forces.

 

Then you have those folks that say the above are still too big to really be special and you run into all these really tiny groups with strange names (or various letters) and people that go off to write books about how cool they are but can't really talk about it.

 

So which group are we talking about in the reverse pecker competition? 


alright lets reword this abit due to joe's valid point... let's say worst CT/hostage rescue op' carried out by a credible special forces unit (by that i mean a currently exsiting unit that doesn't usually operate in standard methods of war) bollocks if you think of it, that still leaves it pretty broad...
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5   NEXT



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics