The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: SEALS vs. USMC FORCE RECON
colts    4/17/2006 3:42:16 AM
I really want to join the military although I am not sure which brance I want to go to. I want to go behind enemy lines and get "down and dirty" so to speak. I want the most action I can get, and not just recon, I want to shoot, fight, I REALLY want combat. I want HALO jumps, scuba training, I want it all. Which branch would be the best for me. I want the hardest training, best training i can get.

P.S. I also heard that navy boot camp and army boot camp is a bunch of bull and for in pussies and do not want to be a part of that. Is the CORE still as bad ass as always?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   NEXT
dirtykraut       5/1/2007 12:04:25 AM
SCCO, I have read your comments and I agree with you that you were only trying to point out who FAST is and what FAST does. For some reason, everyone interpreted what you said into some kind of dick measuring SOF contest. When it is clearly not what you set out to do. I understand your position when people compare FAST to DEVGRU, US Marines to Royal Marines, and I have seen it done before. If anyone is really dumb enough to see everything in balck and white, than it proves their lack of knowledge about military affairs. Because you don't compare US Marines to Royal Marines and you don't compare FAST to DEVGRU. To do so would not only be in ignorance of each of these units, it brings us to a lower level. I am glad you pointed that out.
 
Quote    Reply

stratbert       5/1/2007 8:23:35 PM

BTW, the only HALO combat jump since the GWOT by US forces has been by the Marines...not SEAL's

This is not correct, and no you don't need to know any more.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       5/1/2007 8:44:04 PM



BTW, the only HALO combat jump since the GWOT by US forces has been by the Marines...not SEAL's


This is not correct, and no you don't need to know any more.


But, but...I thought SEAL stood for Sleep, Eat, and Lift.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       5/1/2007 10:20:42 PM

SCCO, I have read your comments and I agree with you that you were only trying to point out who FAST is and what FAST does. For some reason, everyone interpreted what you said into some kind of dick measuring SOF contest. When it is clearly not what you set out to do. I understand your position when people compare FAST to DEVGRU, US Marines to Royal Marines, and I have seen it done before. If anyone is really dumb enough to see everything in balck and white, than it proves their lack of knowledge about military affairs. Because you don't compare US Marines to Royal Marines and you don't compare FAST to DEVGRU. To do so would not only be in ignorance of each of these units, it brings us to a lower level. I am glad you pointed that out.



I didn't compare DEVGRU to FAST, I said DEVGRU whips FAST's a**, there is a difference (and I realize I was off base, by the way).
 
Quote    Reply

mough       5/2/2007 2:53:54 AM



BTW, the only HALO combat jump since the GWOT by US forces has been by the Marines...not SEAL's


This is not correct, and no you don't need to know any more.
If your thinking about what I think your thinking about, you should not have brought it up.......good one

 
Quote    Reply

GOP       5/2/2007 11:23:52 AM







BTW, the only HALO combat jump since the GWOT by US forces has been by the Marines...not SEAL's



This is not correct, and no you don't need to know any more.

If your thinking about what I think your thinking about, you should not have brought it up.......good one


But wait, I know what both of you are thinking and if it's something like I'm thinking, then...wait. Could it be one of you is thinking something I'm thinking but not what we are all thinking? Or is it that thing that I'm thinking that I shouldn't think?
You guys suck with your little OPSEC and such things.
 
Quote    Reply

dirtykraut       5/4/2007 3:00:25 PM




SCCO, I have read your comments and I agree with you that you were only trying to point out who FAST is and what FAST does. For some reason, everyone interpreted what you said into some kind of dick measuring SOF contest. When it is clearly not what you set out to do. I understand your position when people compare FAST to DEVGRU, US Marines to Royal Marines, and I have seen it done before. If anyone is really dumb enough to see everything in balck and white, than it proves their lack of knowledge about military affairs. Because you don't compare US Marines to Royal Marines and you don't compare FAST to DEVGRU. To do so would not only be in ignorance of each of these units, it brings us to a lower level. I am glad you pointed that out.





I didn't compare DEVGRU to FAST, I said DEVGRU whips FAST's a**, there is a difference (and I realize I was off base, by the way).

GOP, that comment was not directed particularly at you. However, saying that DEVGRU whips FAST's ass is indeed a comparison. What SCCO was trying to point out is that FAST is very good at their job; security, and DEVGRU is very good at theirs; killing people. I hate to use the cliche, but it's like saying a heart surgeon is better than a dentists. Now I don't mean to lecture you, as your a knowledgabel guy and you know your stuff, but that is the point SCCO was trying to make, and I am trying to acknowledge it.
 
Quote    Reply

ingnoway    shooting etc.   5/16/2007 7:33:40 PM

Basic response: as Horsesoldier says, go for either Army or Corps, since you will get combat nowadays anyway. If you join the Army, the chances of not getting sent to either 'Stan or Iraq are slim, and if you are in 10th, 82nd or 101st, then you will be seeing almost spec ops type combat anyway (in the current wars, there is less concept of frontlines).

One thing to be careful of is this, if you go in with the attitude of 'all I want is to go behind enemy lines and shoot', you will probably not get into elite units. As horse says, discipline is as important as drive!
  If I were you, I'd go Navy!If you fail BUD/s, you have two excellent choices: SWCC and EOD.
 

 
Quote    Reply

ingnoway    Info   5/16/2007 7:38:17 PM







The SEALs and Recon are for the most part equal. 



Really? So Recon will be doing 10 mile Combat swimmer operations and SEALs will be doing holed up in some hidesite for days reporting back to the USMC? Different mission tasks, different missions. Now, on the things like DA and such, they are probably equal. I tend to think the Teams are superior at HALO, but I'm sure that isn't always the case. Recon has an advantage I believe at Long Range Recce. Obviously the SEALs are superior at combat swimming. As far as OPLAT, they are probably equal, although I do think that the Teams have a wider variety of transportation options (due to the fact that they are combat swimmers). H2H is also probably a tossup, but I do really like the SEALs CQD system.

So,  basically:



 



Combat swimmer: SEAL



Recce: Recon



Others: Tossup.



 



 



All these things are variable lad, if a FR unit is doing more DA missions then a given SEAL platoon, ect ect, then the FR team would be considered "better", skill's get used or they get rusty, you can train and train all you want, but unless those skills are employed it's really a mute point,

BTW, you can't really be better at HALO jumping, your either good or dead...


How do you know this? I was on a westpac, with FR and SEALS and they never speak about their ops?
But, I'm not saying your wrong either etc.
 
Quote    Reply

mough       5/17/2007 1:19:25 PM



Basic response: as Horsesoldier says, go for either Army or Corps, since you will get combat nowadays anyway. If you join the Army, the chances of not getting sent to either 'Stan or Iraq are slim, and if you are in 10th, 82nd or 101st, then you will be seeing almost spec ops type combat anyway (in the current wars, there is less concept of frontlines).

One thing to be careful of is this, if you go in with the attitude of 'all I want is to go behind enemy lines and shoot', you will probably not get into elite units. As horse says, discipline is as important as drive!

  If I were you, I'd go Navy!If you fail BUD/s, you have two excellent choices: SWCC and EOD.
 


Are you saying getting into Navy EOD's is easier then the SEAL's?

 
Quote    Reply

mough       5/17/2007 1:23:56 PM











The SEALs and Recon are for the most part equal. 





Really? So Recon will be doing 10 mile Combat swimmer operations and SEALs will be doing holed up in some hidesite for days reporting back to the USMC? Different mission tasks, different missions. Now, on the things like DA and such, they are probably equal. I tend to think the Teams are superior at HALO, but I'm sure that isn't always the case. Recon has an advantage I believe at Long Range Recce. Obviously the SEALs are superior at combat swimming. As far as OPLAT, they are probably equal, although I do think that the Teams have a wider variety of transportation options (due to the fact that they are combat swimmers). H2H is also probably a tossup, but I do really like the SEALs CQD system.

So,  basically:





 





Combat swimmer: SEAL





Recce: Recon





Others: Tossup.





 





 





All these things are variable lad, if a FR unit is doing more DA missions then a given SEAL platoon, ect ect, then the FR team would be considered "better", skill's get used or they get rusty, you can train and train all you want, but unless those skills are employed it's really a mute point,

BTW, you can't really be better at HALO jumping, your either good or dead...



How do you know this? I was on a westpac, with FR and SEALS and they never speak about their ops?
But, I'm not saying your wrong either etc.

How do I know what?....and who's talking about operations, you use your skills or they degrade, it's a universal fact, if a unit is doing a certain activity more then another and at a higher tempo, shear repetion and first hand skill knowlage will make them "better" then a unit that is not...doesn't matter how high speed you are or how cool you think you are.

 
Quote    Reply

mough       8/27/2008 12:27:35 AM









SCCO, I have read your comments and I agree with you that you were only trying to point out who FAST is and what FAST does. For some reason, everyone interpreted what you said into some kind of dick measuring SOF contest. When it is clearly not what you set out to do. I understand your position when people compare FAST to DEVGRU, US Marines to Royal Marines, and I have seen it done before. If anyone is really dumb enough to see everything in balck and white, than it proves their lack of knowledge about military affairs. Because you don't compare US Marines to Royal Marines and you don't compare FAST to DEVGRU. To do so would not only be in ignorance of each of these units, it brings us to a lower level. I am glad you pointed that out.












I didn't compare DEVGRU to FAST, I said DEVGRU whips FAST's a**, there is a difference (and I realize I was off base, by the way).




Your taking from the MARINES knowledge of themselves and repeating it!It's very illegal...

"Illegal"?....that's a shaky grasp of the law you have there squid

 
Quote    Reply

seals       6/10/2009 8:50:37 PM
colts if you want action and danger and hand to hand and shooting and halo and haho than join the us navy seals you are alot more elite. when you are in force recon you just are like a scout for the grunts and they get hit in friendly fire because the grunts mistake them for enmy. and if you want to become a naval officer for seals the two best ways to do that is go the the naval acadmey.or just go into the navy and go into officer training and the seal video games don't work get out atleast 3 times daily and do dead hangs and push ups and run and go out for sports to train your body for buds witch is about a year plus sere and sqt
 
Quote    Reply

Charlie 1/1       7/5/2009 5:03:44 PM
    Let me first give a little information about myself....I was a Marine for 4 years where I was a grunt and eventually a Scout/Sniper.  I left the Marine Corps to enlist in the Army. I went Airborne and then onto Special Forces. I am not alone in this journy as may marines have done similar things ( SF, CCT, SEALs, ect.). Everyone here is correct that the odds are stacked against you but ...so what. You must train to be extremely physicaly fit and have a mind set that will allow you to block out pain and discomfort. Being elit literaly means liking to be miserable ALL THE TIME! As for boot camp...This should't even be a consideration as it will have little affect on you if you are prepared to be SF ( or Recon, SEAL,ect..) If not then this alone ill break you and you should have stayed home. As far as who is better......They all train for the same typs of missions and goto the SAME SCHOOLS....When you goto military free fall school all branches wil be there, and all the instructors are fro different branchs as well. When I went to combat diver course the instructors where mostly SEALS. This is the way it is beacause you will be working for SOCOM or JSOC regardless of what branch you are. As for a unit that has the highest operational tempo durring peace or war.... I would go SEAL and try to get in to the Naval Special Warfare Dvelopment Group ( was Known as SEAL team 6 )....or Army 1st SFOD-D ( unofficaly known as DELTA ).... These are the best and are VERY selective.... I'd say you have a 1 in a million chance of getting there... However don't get discouraged. The Army is more supportave of such endevors and would be my first choice. The Navy or Air Force is much quicker since you don't have to be infantry first. The Marine Corps untill recently were not a part of JSOC so some things might have changed....But ALL Marines feel their the best and don't care for spec ops ( or Snipers, ect ). With this additudeits very difficult to even get command permmision to to indocs to try out for Force, or STA. It won't take long and you'll be very unhappy where you're at and you won't be able to do anything about it till its time to EAS ( get out).
 
Good Luck.
 
 
Quote    Reply

drummergod92       9/23/2009 9:39:58 PM
okay here is the deal i was like you 3 months ago wasnt sure where in the military i should go but after i was accepted to odu i talked to a navyal rotc instructor he said that if i were to join the marines and attempt and pass the RF training you are elligible for BUDs and if you can pass the RF you have obviously trained and shown dedication to be a SEAL (plus HALO/HAHO is already done) SEAL training,mentally, should be a piece of cake. As the SEALs say BUDs is 90% mental 10% physical. So basically go with your heart but me smart becom a Marine then a SEAL. Also Army rangers do this too. By the way just so you know pretty much everyone is behind enemy lines now days frontlines died pretty much when the commi guerillas came into play.
SEALs: if u like sneaking up on the enemy and willing to use any element (Sea Air or Land)
RF: is really only got the badass label on their snipers otherwise your basically the SEALs intelligence
Berets: if you wanna know everything there is about war and want to teach it so you can create your army in a foreign land
AFP: if you like the classified title
DF: your classified as well but if you like being a hero hostage situation is the way to go and they are the masters
 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy