The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - March 21, 2010




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Commandos and Special Operations Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: NAVY SEALS VS BRITISH SAS
LJ813    7/1/2005 9:34:17 PM
I WILL GO FOR THE NAVY..
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41   NEXT
bob the brit    bob's coming out   12/19/2007 12:50:20 AM

 

Some idiot from the UK tried to tell me that SEALS don't take men over six feet tall because, as he alleged, taller men are slower.. I pointed out they take anyone who meets their requirements and passes their tests --whether 4 feet or 8 feet. I also pointed out my brother is 6'3'' tall and he was in the top three in running and swimming out of a platoon of about 50 guys. I also wrote a SEAL and told him what that UK idiot said. He responded:

 

"if your brother was a SEAL then he should be able to convince this
fellow that SEALs are indeed the cream of the crop. As for height, I am
6'5" tall so there goes the height question. The SAS is indeed a great
group of guys doing a fantastic job wherever they go. Are they better
than SEALs? No. We both have our strengths, I just feel we are a bit
more rounded. Hope this helps"


R/
SO1 (SEAL) [deleted by Sysops]

as for that little quote, [and please, to all others, i'm not suddenly boasting, just applying my opinion], I would not say the SEALs are more rounded than the regiment. It was not there job to be. The regiment had a few more job titles than the SEALs, now I'm not saying this is better [if anything it gave SEALs better chance to focus on their area of expertise], but you would find more checks on an errands checklist of the regiment than you would the SEALs. After saying this though, Mr. [deleted by SysOps]'s opinion is no greater or lesser than mine, 'nuff said.
theo, why don't you write to santa aswell and see what he says?
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/19/2007 1:18:09 AM

After saying this though, Mr. deleted by SysOps]'s opinion is no greater or lesser than mine, 'nuff said.


I've asked for confirmation on Mr [deleted by Sysops].

I'm more interested in Theos brother.

First name (or nickname), currency (or a year when active) and where he was located for that year will do fine.......


 
Quote    Reply

dirtykraut       12/19/2007 1:49:27 AM
Theo, I'll give you the reason why people like you have a SEAL fettish. Back in the early 90's, the cold war had just ended, and the military was beginning it's transformation from a cold war army to global military capable of projecting power anywhere on the planet.  To do this, they needed less army personell and more Navy personell. However, the Navy had difficulty recruiting the numbers they needed. This was because Army, Marine, and Air Force ads were interesting, and could catch the viewers attention. In the army you could drive a tank, in the Air Force you could fly a plane, and in the Marine Corps you could be part of something greater than yourself, or so the ads portrayed them. The Navy really didn't have much to show/offer, and the most accurate Navy recruiting commercial back then would have been of sailors drinking coffee, chipping paint, and working in confined spaces for 6 months at a time. So the Navy decided to put SEALs in these ads. And what do you know, it worked. SEAL publicicity continued to skyrocket after that, and the SEAL mythology was created. It's not unlike how the SAS mythos was created after the 1980 Iranian embassy siege.
 
Having said that, both are excellent units. Comparisons between the two units have to be taken in the right context. It has been mentioned, that they are both different units with different tasks. A more apt comparison would be that of the SBS and SEALs. You also have to remember that as queer as it sounds, the SAS is a tier one unit and the SEALs are not. It is a more experienced unit (due to the experience of the individual operators, not how long the two units have been around). It is also a more selective unit. Soldiers who attend SAS selection have years of experience, and were chosen to go to selection because of their stellar performance in their previous regiments. Whereas 90% of SEAL recruits come from SEAL challenge contracts or volunteers in basic or A school. In otherwords, brand new sailors with NO experience, however fit they may be. The SEALS are also 10 times larger than the SAS. The SAS is also a better funded unit. The SAS I believe is anywhere from 200-400 soldiers (correct me if I'm wrong Bob), and one of the reasons for the unit's excellence is that MoD spends well over 400 million dollars on the unit, the most expensive regiment in the British army. SEALs, however, are the red headed stepchildren of SOCOM, and probably recieve less funding than their peers in SOCOM and JSOC because of it.  Not all SOF's are created equal, and these things must be taken into account when a comparison is made.
 
Quote    Reply

mough       12/19/2007 11:38:02 AM
I'm still trying to figure ot how his "brother" could get into so many fight's and not be tagged for personality issues or maybe even behavioural and emotional one's then recieve the order of the boot, guys like that don't last too long in operational unit's, regular ones, never mind SOF's, too unpredictable, temperamental, if he loses the head in the civie World, what happenes under stress and in combat?, that whole lone wolf/Rambo bullshit is best left for the movies.....don't see it myself
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       12/19/2007 11:59:14 AM

Theo, I'll give you the reason why people like you have a SEAL fetish. Back in the early 90's, the cold war had just ended, and the military was beginning it's transformation from a cold war army to global military capable of projecting power anywhere on the planet.  To do this, they needed less army personell and more Navy personell. However, the Navy had difficulty recruiting the numbers they needed. This was because Army, Marine, and Air Force ads were interesting, and could catch the viewers attention. In the army you could drive a tank, in the Air Force you could fly a plane, and in the Marine Corps you could be part of something greater than yourself, or so the ads portrayed them. The Navy really didn't have much to show/offer, and the most accurate Navy recruiting commercial back then would have been of sailors drinking coffee, chipping paint, and working in confined spaces for 6 months at a time. So the Navy decided to put SEALs in these ads. And what do you know, it worked. SEAL publicicity continued to skyrocket after that, and the SEAL mythology was created. It's not unlike how the SAS mythos was created after the 1980 Iranian embassy siege.

 

Having said that, both are excellent units. Comparisons between the two units have to be taken in the right context. It has been mentioned, that they are both different units with different tasks. A more apt comparison would be that of the SBS and SEALs. You also have to remember that as queer as it sounds, the SAS is a tier one unit and the SEALs are not. It is a more experienced unit (due to the experience of the individual operators, not how long the two units have been around). It is also a more selective unit. Soldiers who attend SAS selection have years of experience, and were chosen to go to selection because of their stellar performance in their previous regiments. Whereas 90% of SEAL recruits come from SEAL challenge contracts or volunteers in basic or A school. In otherwords, brand new sailors with NO experience, however fit they may be. The SEALS are also 10 times larger than the SAS. The SAS is also a better funded unit. The SAS I believe is anywhere from 200-400 soldiers (correct me if I'm wrong Bob), and one of the reasons for the unit's excellence is that MoD spends well over 400 million dollars on the unit, the most expensive regiment in the British army. SEALs, however, are the red headed stepchildren of SOCOM, and probably recieve less funding than their peers in SOCOM and JSOC because of it.  Not all SOF's are created equal, and these things must be taken into account when a comparison is made.


we'll leave it around that range... could be bang smack in the middle, could be just outside that range, 'tis another one of those unfortunate mysteries only those that know will know. some try to add up the numbers [four men in a brick, four bricks in a troop, four troops in a sabre, four sabres {plus the resevere squadrn}] however, those numbers are never true for every squadron, and that leaves out all the support staff and 'extras'
 
Quote    Reply

static       12/19/2007 1:47:51 PM


I've asked for confirmation on Mr [deleted by SysOps].

I'm more interested in Theos brother.

First name (or nickname), currency (or a year when active) and where he was located for that year will do fine.......


So is Mr.[deleted by SysOps] an actual Dive Motivator then?  Curious...

Its not saying much since I think you can go to the SEAL challenge website and they will put you in contact with one.  The formatting does suggest that he copied/pasted it from somewhere anyway.  Also what is the timeframe for class 145?  Late 80s?
 
Quote    Reply

mough       12/19/2007 2:41:23 PM
Class 145 was a good 20 year's ago at least.
 
Quote    Reply

dirtykraut       12/19/2007 8:43:34 PM
This may be a little off topic but is anyone getting any strange ads on strategypage? I constantly get ads for the book of mormon when I visit this website.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    mough alert   12/21/2007 6:18:18 PM
mate, check your T5C PM's
 
gf
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       12/21/2007 6:57:45 PM

I'm still trying to figure ot how his "brother" could get into so many fight's and not be tagged for personality issues or maybe even behavioural and emotional one's then recieve the order of the boot, guys like that don't last too long in operational unit's, regular ones, never mind SOF's, too unpredictable, temperamental, if he loses the head in the civie World, what happenes under stress and in combat?, that whole lone wolf/Rambo bullshit is best left for the movies.....don't see it myself


I agree. He "beats up Marines often", so Im absolutely shocked that his "Brother" is still in the Teams. Wouldn't that constitute an integrity issue? They seem very, very serious about that. Heck, I even think Mookie was kicked out for integrity issues.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/23/2007 3:43:34 AM

All. FEI/FYI. 

Theo is no longer in this building. 

 
Quote    Reply

Seal_08    Seal traing   12/25/2007 2:24:00 AM
seal traing is not 6 weeks long i would know this cuz im about to go through my self. Bud/s is 6 months which is broken down in to 3 different phase the first 2 months is all conditioning. With in the first 5 weeks i think it is, you go through hell week. It is 5 and ahalf days of stright physical and mental conditioning with only 4 hours a sleep, no not a day, but with in the hole week. but after the first 2 months which is to basically eliminate the weak from the strong. next 2 months is dive phase and then the next 2 months is small tactical unit traing. then after bud/s you go to parachute school other wize known as jump school. thats a month long by its self. after that is 5 months of advance sea air and land traing, after you have complete a year of seal traing you graduate, but its still not done yet. you get asssighned to a seal team and then do individual traing for up to 6 months. after all that your ready to be put to the test in the real world.
 
if you didnt know there is a 80% drop out rate, which means people DOR  (drop on request), theres been a couple of years where know one makes it. so its pretty dang hard. not to many people make the seals theres only about less then 3000 seals.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Seal_08    Seal traing   12/25/2007 2:33:30 AM
How are we comparing them? Operationally. The SAS do classical counter terrorist operations, they are door kickers and spend most of there time practicing kicking in doors, going undercover, doing HALO, and rappelling. The SEALs specialize in classical underwater operations, they are divers and spend most of their time diving, swimming, jumping from helicopters, and some HALO.
 
 
Seals got to be just as certified. seals also do HAHO.
seals stand for SEa Air and Lead. there also called the frog man.
SAS is pretty damn good but i think the seals got them in the water which it is there specialty
and SAS ( special air services) is air.but there anit nothing special about jumping halo or haho now the water is a different story.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       12/26/2007 2:24:34 AM

How are we comparing them? Operationally. The SAS do classical counter terrorist operations, they are door kickers and spend most of there time practicing kicking in doors, going undercover, doing HALO, and rappelling. The SEALs specialize in classical underwater operations, they are divers and spend most of their time diving, swimming, jumping from helicopters, and some HALO.
 

 

Seals got to be just as certified. seals also do HAHO.

seals stand for SEa Air and Lead. there also called the frog man.

SAS is pretty damn good but i think the seals got them in the water which it is there specialty

and SAS ( special air services) is air.but there anit nothing special about jumping halo or haho now the water is a different story.



You don't know much, do you? For someone about to go through the SEAL pipeline, you seem pretty uneducated. Good luck with that though.
First of all, It's SEa Air Land.
 
Secondly, the SAS has some extremely good combat swimmers aswell.
 
Third, the "Special Air Service" name has more to do with their original past than any kind of TO/E, mission specialization, whatever. They are extremely good in the air, but they don't 'specialize' in HALO/HAHO ops. The SAS doesn't specialize in any one area, although they are extremely well know for their SR, especially in the desert.
 
So comparing the SEAL Teams to the SAS, and saying they "are just as certified", is retarded. The SAS is more selective, has a higher budget per man, is a tier 1 unit, trains with other Tier 1 units more often, and see a shit ton of action. So, this whole SEAL/SAS comparison is way out of kilter. Yeah, we absolutely cannot compare them, but the SAS is a tier 1 force. That counts for alot.  
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       12/26/2007 5:17:51 AM

and SAS ( special air services) is air.but there anit nothing special about jumping halo or haho now the water is a different story.


maybe you should do some homework before presenting ill informed opinion as fact. The SAS is a corp divided up into 3 regiments.
One regiment includes sabre squadrons.  each squadron includes a number(usually 4) of sixteen man troops.  each troop has a speciality /functional responsibility.  They are divided into an Air Troop, Boat Troop, Mobility Troop, and Mountain Troop.
 
the other regiments have discrete roles.
 
The name is a legacy of its historical foundation - not an exclusivity of mode of operation.

 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2010StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy