The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 25, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: White paper orders huge military build-up!!!!!!!!!
Volkodav    4/25/2009 3:36:57 AM
Ummm wow! How accurate is this?

Patrick Walters, National security editor | April 25, 2009

Article from: The Australian

KEVIN Rudd is set to announce Australia's biggest military build-up since World War II, led by a multi-billion-dollar investment in maritime defence, including 100 new F-35 fighters, a doubling of the submarine fleet, and powerful new surface warships.

Play
12345Loading?Please login to rate a video.You can't rate an advertisement.(1 vote)

Biggest military boost since WWII
Kevin Rudd is set to roll out the biggest military build-up since World War II. 04/09 Sky News
Views today: 396Sorry, this video is no longer available.The new defence white paper will outline plans for a fundamental shake-up of Australia's defence organisation to ensure that the nation can meet what the Prime Minister sees as a far more challenging and uncertain security outlook in Asia over the next two decades.

China's steadily growing military might and the prospect of sharper strategic competition among Asia's great powers are driving the maritime build-up, which will see new-generation submarines and warships equipped with cruise missiles, and a big new investment in anti-submarine warfare and electronic warfare platforms, including new naval helicopters.

The white paper will consider the emerging non-traditional threats to Australia, including cyber security, climate change and its associated risk of large uncontrolled people movements.

Senior government sources say Mr Rudd has insisted that defence spending remain largely insulated from the Government's budget difficulties, but the Defence Department will still have to find at least $15 billion of internal savings over the next decade to help pay for the $100 billion-plus long-term equipment plan.

Mr Rudd said yesterday the delivery of the white paper was proving "acutely challenging as we work to defend ourselves from the global economic storm".

"It is the most difficult environment to frame the Australian budget in modern economic history. It is also the most difficult environment to frame our long-term defence planning in modern economic history as well," he told the Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce. "Nevertheless the Government will not resile even in the difficult times from the requirement for long-term coherence of our defence planning for the long-term security of our nation. This is core business for government. That is why we have forged ahead in our preparation of the defence white paper because national security needs do not disappear because of the global recession. If anything, those needs become more acute."

Funding pressures will mean the navy will not get a fourth air warfare destroyer, and the delivery of the first batch of the RAAF's F-35 joint strike fighters will slip by at least one year to 2014-15.

The huge cost of paying for the next-generation defence force, due to be detailed in the white paper and the forthcoming 10-year defence capability plan, will have little impact on the defence budget over the the next four years.

Apart from the air warfare destroyers and the F-35 fighters, most of the planned defence purchases will not have to be paid for until well into the next decade and beyond.

Mr Rudd and Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon are expected to release the long-awaited white paper as early as next week, with the more detailed 10-year defence capability plan due to be published by mid-year.

The naval build-up will be led by a planned 12-strong submarine fleet expected to replace the Collins-class boats from 2025. It will enable the RAN to deploy up to seven boats to protect Australia's northern approaches, including key maritime straits running through the Indonesian archipelago, at times of high threat.

The white paper will outline the requirement for a new class of eight 7000-tonne warships equipped with ballistic missile defence systems similar to the three air warfare destroyers already on order that will eventually replace the Anzac frigates.

A new class of 1500-tonne corvette-size patrol boats able to take a helicopter is slated to replace the Armidale-class vessels from the mid-2020s.

The more robust maritime force will also mean the RAAF's veteran AP-3 Orion fleet being replaced with a mix of at least eight P-8 Poseidon long-range surveillance aircraft, together with up to seven unmanned aerial surveillance vehicles, possibly the US-made Global Hawk, operating out of an expanded Edinburgh air base in South Australia.

The navy is also expected to acquire up to 27 anti-submarine helicopters.

Mr Rudd has foreshadowed the maritime build-up as pointing to the need for Australia to accommodate "huge increases in military spending here in our own region".

"If we are going to defend our sea-lines of communication to the rest of the world, we have got to make sure that we have got the naval capability to underpin that. And Australia must therefore have necessary maritime power in the future in order to give that effect," Mr Rudd said late last year.

As well as re-equipping with up to 100 F-35 fighters, the air force is expected to get up to six extra C-130J Hercules transport aircraft and a replacement for the Vietnam war-era Caribou light transport, expected to be the C-27J.

The $10 billion long-term expansion and "hardening and networking" of the army will continue with the regular army growing to about 30,000, including eight infantry battalions.

The army's Chinook helicopter fleet is expected to expand from six to 10 aircraft and the land force is expected to be re-equipped with self-propelled and towed artillery in the next decade.

The army will also acquire a new generation of armoured fighting vehicles from 2020.

The new white paper says Australia's defence force should be capable of taking the lead security role in Australia's neighbourhood, particularly the South Pacific, as well as having the ability to deploy military forces further afield.

Senior government sources say this year's white paper is a more broad-ranging and ambitious document than the 2000 white paper. It aims to give Australia more strategic weight and the Government more options when it comes to deploying military forces in the neighbourhood or further afield.

The white paper has moved defence doctrine back to a more regionally-focused approach firmly founded on the defence of Australia. It rejects the notion that terrorism and unconventional intrastate conflict should be a primary driver of the defence force structure.

The Rudd Government's focus on expensive war-fighting equipment underlines the Prime Minister's view that Australia must face up to a much broader range of contingencies, including the strategic consequences of inter-state conflict in Asia.

For the first time the white paper will address in detail electronic warfare trends, particularly the growing cyber security threat to Australia's national security network.

The Government is already investing millions of dollars to bolster Australia's cyber defence capability, led by the Defence Signals Directorate, and will invest even more heavily in the years ahead to protect critical infrastructure from cyber attacks already being mounted by a number of countries led by China and Russia. The Government is also moving quietly to bolster Australia's ability to mount offensive cyber operations.

The threat posed by ballistic missile proliferation in the Asia-Pacific will also be carefully monitored by Defence but the Government has ruled out any early development of a dedicated ballistic missile defence system for Australia. The biggest challenge to the blueprint remains the global economic crisis.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT
gf0012-aust       5/3/2009 4:09:30 PM


Kuang Hua V corvette -Displacement of 1,500-2,000 tons (Range 4000 nm)

"Small, 1,500 ton corvettes can offer a solution by way of their ability to apply appropriate naval force at the decisive point, at the decisive moment" (Smith 94).

 

Is this the type of thing they are thinking?

no, they're looking at the austal concept.  different hullform
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear       5/3/2009 11:03:25 PM
no, they're looking at the austal concept.  different hullform
 
Could that be something based on their MRV86 design?
 
I was thinking about the OPV70 until you mentioned the hull.
 
Curious.
 
 
Quote    Reply

BLUIE006       5/4/2009 4:43:40 AM
As in the "Austral Multi-Role Vessel "
 
Nice choice...If i do say so myself.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       5/4/2009 5:34:39 AM

How good would these be after another tsunami, or on anti-piracy ops? That massive cargo deck opens so many possibilities.

 
Quote    Reply

BLUIE006       5/4/2009 6:17:23 AM
A very good solution for Anti-Piracy Ops!!!!
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       5/4/2009 7:06:23 AM
I wonder if the MRV could be fitted with 9VL, CEAFAR, CEAMOUNT and ESSM?
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear       5/4/2009 9:25:54 AM
I wonder if the MRV could be fitted with 9VL, CEAFAR, CEAMOUNT and ESSM?
 
Dead set???
 
You want to put ESSM on a patrol vessel??? I don't think they are designed for a 21st century Sino-Jutlandesque type engagement.
 
Didn't think Bluefin tuna theft and illegal immigrants had escalated to that level yet. 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Diggermark 2       5/4/2009 10:19:42 AM

I wonder if the MRV could be fitted with 9VL, CEAFAR, CEAMOUNT and ESSM?
 

Dead set???

 

You want to put ESSM on a patrol vessel??? I don't think they are designed for a 21st century Sino-Jutlandesque type engagement.

 

Didn't think Bluefin tuna theft and illegal immigrants had escalated to that level yet. 

They are intended for "littoral warfare" according to the WP...
 
What this translates to is anybody's guess, but  in my opinion, that would at least translate to:
 
1. A medium calibre gun system (hopefully 57mm to 76mm).
 
2. A missile based self defence system (RAM / SEA-RAM)
 
3. A moderate land attack capability (57/76mm gun and NLOS/LS type missile capability).
 
4. Modular mission systems for ASW, mine warfare, special forces delivery and recovery etc.
 
I'll wait a bit to see if anything like this pans out though....
 
Quote    Reply

DropBear       5/4/2009 10:26:36 AM
So essentially they are a new role envisaged platform and not intended to replace the Armidales at all?
 
I thought they were merely to be scaled up Armidale replacements with helo capacity, not another larger combat capability.
 
I learn something new everyday.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       5/4/2009 5:14:20 PM


Didn't think Bluefin tuna theft and illegal immigrants had escalated to that level yet. 

 Seen how much one bluefin is worth?  noticed that the worlds bluefin natural stocks are down.  note that australia now leads the world in blue fin sea farming developments _ and is the only one to successfully do this after hagan steyrs(??) spent some 5 years in development.

the potential for a southern hemisphere "cod war"  is very real.

 

 



 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Diggermark 2       5/4/2009 8:12:29 PM

So essentially they are a new role envisaged platform and not intended to replace the Armidales at all?

 

I thought they were merely to be scaled up Armidale replacements with helo capacity, not another larger combat capability.

 

I learn something new everyday.


They are intended to replace the Armidales and the Huons and the Oceanography survey vessels.
 
 
They will also most likely include helo/UAV operating capability and therefore will be a significant advance on the Armidales. The WP says they are also to be equipped to engage in surface and littoral warfighting duties, hence the equipment fit I mentioned above.
 
When you put it all together it sounds very much like Navy wants LCS or similar and Customs can handle the in-shore stuff....
 
Quote    Reply

Cyrus       5/7/2009 9:11:45 AM
If they are to be 2000 ton then the MRV's are to small the largest being the MRV 90 at 1250t  in fact the only one in the austral line up that could  do all they want it to do without starting from scratch is the 1980t LCS 127.
 
Quote    Reply

hairy man       5/7/2009 9:11:50 PM
1980 tonne, 2000 tonne, sounds pretty close to me.
 
Quote    Reply

hairy man       5/7/2009 9:14:02 PM

1980 tonne, 2000 tonne, sounds pretty close to me.


Although surely they will be able come up with a purpose designed ship now they know what is required!
 
Quote    Reply

BLUIE006       5/8/2009 5:38:26 AM
IMHO the Ideal Solution Would be a Combo of the MRV & LCS. (6+14)

The Navy currently operates four relatively small fleets of vessels for important tasks such as offshore resource protection, border security, hydrographic and oceanographic environmental assessments
and clearing sea mines. This significantly increases whole-of-life ownership costs and personnel overheads. Smaller vessels also have less seagoing capacity and a reduced scope for installing more capable sensor or weapons systems over time.
The Government has therefore decided that Defence will develop proposals to rationalise the Navy's patrol boat, mine counter measures, hydrographic and oceanographic forces into a single modular multirole class of around 20 Offshore Combatant Vessels combining four existing classes of vessels. This has the potential to provide significant operational efficiencies and potential savings. The new vessels will be larger than the current Armidale class patrol boats, with an anticipated displacement of up to 2,000 tonnes.
 
 The future Offshore Combatant Vessel will be able to undertake offshore and littoral warfighting roles, border protection tasks, long-range counter-terrorism and counter-piracy operations, support to special forces, and missions in support of security and stability in the immediate neighbourhood. Defence will examine the potential for these new ships to embark a helicopter or UAV, to allow a surge in surveillance and response capabilities without the need to deploy additional ships. This increased capability will also ensure that major surface combatants are free for more demanding operations.
 
Sounds alot like the LCS? Which would be great news!  
However one wonders if sending a LCS to intecept a boat load of  illegal's; might be a bit of an overkill?  
 
Perhaps the NZ theory might be worth a look  Inshore & Offshore?
 
OPV = LCS (14)
IPV = MRV (6-8)
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy