The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 24, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Is Afghanistan more dangerous for our troops without extra support?
Aussiegunneragain    3/18/2009 4:06:29 AM
The article below seems to indicate that by sending our Army trainers out with Afghan Forces alone, we are putting them at greater risk due to lower levels of competence amongst the latter. Could the prospect that by sending our own infantry to patrol in greater numbers with the Afghan's we might reduce casualties, be just the thing for the Army getting to deploy the extra troops there that it wants to?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25203373-31477,00.html

Digger's death exposes Afghan roleFont Size: Decrease Increase Patrick Walters, National security editor | March 18, 2009

Article from: The Australian

MILITARY chiefs have defended the support given to Australia's new army training teams in Afghanistan following the death of another soldier, killed in a firefight with the Taliban.

Play
12345Loading?Please login to rate a video.You can't rate an advertisement.(5 votes)

Dead digger a new dad
The latest Australian soldier to die in Afghanistan became a father just days ago. 3/09 Sky News
Views today: 1089Sorry, this video is no longer available.The soldier, the ninth Australian serviceman to die in Afghanistan, was a member of the army's newly established operational mentor and liaison team, which is helping to train an Afghan National Army battalion.

He was badly wounded while on patrol with the ANA soon after 9am (3.30pm AEDT) on Monday near the village of Kakarak, 12km north of the Australian base at Tarin Kowt.

Defence chief Angus Houston said yesterday the infantryman had suffered a serious gunshot wound after his patrol became involved in an intense firefight with about 20 Taliban insurgents using small arms and rocket-propelled grenades.

Air Chief Marshal Houston said an aero-medical evacuation was called in and two Apache helicopters sent from Tarin Kowt to help fight off the insurgents.

The soldier was evacuated by helicopter to Tarin Kowt but declared dead on arrival.

The young soldier, from the Darwin-based 7RAR, was the first member of the Mentoring and Reconstruction Task Force to be killed since its formation last October. His death has brought into sharp scrutiny the roles and missions being performed by Australian soldiers in Oruzgan province. A fortnight ago, an officer with the first of the OML teams in Oruzgan, Lieutenant Jake Kleinman, said he would like more infantry to support operations.

"If we were going to increase troops here, I think infantry should be the first step, followed by more engineers to support their operations," he told Sky News. Lieutenant Kleinman said while it was not his job to talk about numbers, up to an extra battalion of infantry (about 750 troops) would be "excellent" for Oruzgan.

Some Australian trainers are also understood to have expressed reservations about the fighting prowess of the Afghan army while on joint patrols.

Air Chief Marshal Houston said yesterday he was satisfied that OML teams had enough support when on patrol with Afghan soldiers.

"I'm satisfied that, in these circumstances, these soldiers had all the support they needed, given the circumstances that they came up against," he said. "If you're up against 20 people who are well-armed and are engaging you with rocket-propelled grenades, small arms, there is going to be considerable risk associated with what you're doing."

Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon said the Government constantly reviewed troop numbers in Afghanistan and was guided by advice from defence chiefs.

Kevin Rudd said he was deeply saddened to learn of the soldier's death and the nation mourned.

"He was a fine and courageous soldier in the great Anzac tradition," the Prime Minister told parliament.

Army trainers working in the OML teams are embedded with Afghan army units in forward operating bases away from the main Australian base at Kamp Holland. They help ANA soldiers plan operations, accompany them on joint patrols and advise on tactics.

 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: 1 2
neutralizer       3/26/2009 3:23:16 AM
TQ is too far East for GMLRS from the current areas in N Helmand, also probably too far North for lnchers arounf Kandahar.
 
The NL already have perfectly adequate 155mm available in Oruzgan.  Shouldn't be any more of a problem than it is for UK providing direct support to the DK battlegroup (who incidentally are European and have taken significnat casualties, something the Aust media ignores, what does 'our' Princess Mary think of that I wonder).
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

BLUIE006       3/26/2009 8:02:09 AM

MULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEM (MLRS) M270A1 LAUNCHER

 

Army ACAT IC Program

 

Prime Contractor

Total Number of Systems:

857

Lockheed Martin Vought Systems

Total Program Cost (TY$):

$2,297.7M

 

Average Unit Cost (TY$):

$2.437M

 

Full-rate production:

1QFY02

 

 

Guided Multiple Launch Rocket - The average unit cost for the entire program would be about $92,000 for 42,000

 

US Army (1000) France (55), Germany (150), Italy (24) and Britain (63). The MLRS was subsequently bought by Bahrain (9 launchers), Denmark (8), Egypt (26), Greece (41), Israel (54), Japan (77), South Korea (29), Netherlands (22, being phased out), Norway (12) and Turkey (15).

 

Wonder if anyone has any 2nd Hand ones going cheap? Potentially Germany or Holland ?  (The GFC and all that )

 

55000 X 1000 = 55 000000 = 1000 GMLRS Rockets

 

1.2M ? 2.0M X 12 (2nd Hand) = $14 ? 24 Million = 12 X M270A1

 

2.4M X 12 = $28.8 Million (New- If can get) = 12 X M270A1

 

It would seem that for about $70-80 Million, you could get a valuable capability, that could be deployed in support of current operations.

For a $100 Million Might!!! Be able to get through life support & training?
 
Excuse me Dr Gumley,  could i borrow the credit card? hehehe
 
Quote    Reply

BLUIE006       3/26/2009 8:30:35 AM
XM982 Excalibur = As of 2008, unit costs are $85,000, potentially dropping to $50,000 in full-scale production
Range of approximately 40 to 57 km
Depending on configuration a circular error probable (CEP) of around 10 m
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain    ANA incompetance   3/28/2009 3:32:44 AM
I have recently spoken to an ex-serviceman who served in Afghanistand and learned a lot of very interesting things. On the issue of ANA incompetence he basically said that the main reason is that apart from the Police, the Army is the absolute employer of last resort in that country. Consequently the guy's who join are often nutcases who spend a lot of time getting stoned and firing their weapons at the ceiling fans in their accomodation. Sort of shows you the problems the trainers are up against. Apparently the Police are even worse and have been known to lend their weapons to the Taiban over night.
 
Quote    Reply

Yak    Threat Grouping   3/28/2009 9:33:14 AM
It may seem old - Inf Bn + Armour + Arty + Avn assets in a package. No isolated deployments.
 
Quote    Reply

neutralizer       3/29/2009 12:40:31 AM
Well yes, it is a bit old fashioned.  Yes a combined arms force is probably necessary, and to some degree essential.  However, in a coalition they don't all have to use wear the same uniform.  For example TF Helmand, which is mostly UK plus Danes & Estonians, relies on the Danes when they need MBTs.  The Danish BG relies entirely on UK for arty, they also seem to have a couple of UK coys under comd for much of the time. 
 
2 SPLLs for GMLRS would be more than adequate for any currently conceivable Aust force in Oruzgan.  However, they do need an upgraded FCS for GMLRS.
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: 1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy