The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - May 16, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Horent Leader
2.Harpoon 4: Modern Tactical Naval Warfare
3.Empires In Arms

4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge
6.Campaigns of King David
7.Queen of the Celts
8.Danube Front '85
9.Axis and Allies: Guadalcanal
10.Guns of August

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Australia Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: DoD media release: REVIEW OF AUSTRALIA?S AIR COMBAT CAPABILITY
tjkhan    2/18/2008 3:18:20 PM
Monday, 18 February 2008
008/2008

REVIEW OF AUSTRALIA?S AIR COMBAT CAPABILITY

The Minister for Defence, the Hon Joel Fitzgibbon MP, today announced the structure and details of the new Government?s promised review into the adequacy of current planning for Australia?s Air Combat Capability to 2045.

?This review will provide the Government with a timely opportunity to assess the strengths of our current plans and inform consideration of our future air combat capability in the context of the new Defence White Paper?, Mr Fitzgibbon said.

The review will be conducted in two stages. The first stage will assess:

A) Australia?s Air Combat Capability requirements in the period 2010 to 2015;

B) the feasibility of retaining the F-111 aircraft in service beyond 2010;

C) a comparative analysis of aircraft available to fill any gap that may be left by the withdrawal of the F-111; and

D) the status of plans to acquire the F/A-18 Super Hornet.

The second stage of the review will consider trends in Asia-Pacific air power until 2045 and the relative capabilities of current and projected fourth and fifth generation combat aircraft such as the Joint Strike Fighter. The review will also examine the case for and against acquiring the F-22. Public submissions will be called for in regard to stage two.

The review team will also consider industry issues relevant to the development of Australia?s future air combat capability.

The review will be led by a senior Defence civilian, Mr Neil Orme, First Assistant Secretary Policy Development. In addition to its Defence membership, the steering group will comprise senior executives from the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, the Treasury and the Department of Finance and Deregulation ?I have asked the review team to provide its report by the end of April 2008 in order that its findings can be considered by Government and incorporated into the development of the Defence White Paper?, Mr Fitzgibbon said.

An unclassified executive summary will be publicly released after Government has considered the classified report.

Process for public submissions:
The review welcomes submissions for stage two of up to 10,000 words from interested groups and individuals. The deadline for submissions is Friday 28 March 2008. Submissions should be made through ACC.Review@defence.gov.au The Terms of Reference are attached.

Media contacts:
Christian Taubenschlag (Joel Fitzgibbon): 02 6277 7800 or 0438 595 567
Defence Media Liaison: 02 6265 3343 or 0408 498 664


Review of the Adequacy of Extant Plans for the Development of Australia?s Air Combat Capability to 2045

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Review Lead
Mr Neil Orme, First Assistant Secretary Policy Development, Department of Defence.

Scope of the Review
The review team will report in two parts.
Part A
1. The review team will report on:
a. Australia?s Air Combat Capability requirements in the period 2010 to 2015; b. the feasibility of retaining the F-111 aircraft in service beyond 2010; c. a comparative analysis of aircraft available to fill any gap that may be left by withdrawal of the F-111; and d. the status of plans to acquire the F/A-18 Super Hornet.

Part B
2. The review team will report on:
a. trends in Asia-Pacific air power until 2045; b. the relative capabilities of current and projected 4th and 5th generation combat aircraft; c. the relative capabilities of Australia?s current and planned air combat systems in light of (a) and (b), identifying key risks; d. the cost and budgetary implications of planned air combat acquisitions; e. the status of plans to acquire the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) and the status of the JSF project, including:
i) the implications of the F/A-18 Super Hornet acquisition for the planned JSF acquisition;
ii) options to achieve an all-JSF fleet should that prove desirable, including advice on the optimum numbers of aircraft in the context of the overall air combat system; and
iii) an assessment of complementary options, including unmanned aerial combat vehicles; f. the case for and against acquiring the F-22; g. The robustness of the plans for transition from the current F-111/F/A-18 fleets to the future fleets, including;
i) weapons systems;
ii) personnel; and
iii) enabling systems and infrastructure; and h. industry issues relevant to the development of Australia?s air combat capability, both in the manufacturing and sustainment domains.
3. The review team will seek and consider public submissions on Part B of this review.
4. The review team will also provide:
a. an unclassified executive summary of the report (to be delivered following Government consideration of the classified report); and b. a report on the public submissions made to the review (to be annexed to both the classified and public versions of the report).


Steering Group
Mr Mike Pezzullo, Deputy Secretary (Defence) (Chair); Air Marshal Geoff Shepherd, Chief of Air Force; Vice Admiral Matt Tripovich, Chief Capability Development Group; Dr Steve Gumley, Chief Executive Officer Defence Materiel Organisation; Dr Roger Lough, Chief Defence Scientist; Mr Duncan Lewis, Deputy Secretary, Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet; Mr David Tune, Deputy Secretary, Department of the Treasury; and Mr Paul Grimes, Deputy Secretary, Department of Finance and Deregulation.

Timing
The full report is to be submitted to the Minister for Defence by 30 April 2008.
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Enterpriser       2/19/2008 1:16:46 AM
I originally thought that the timing here was quite fast, but then realised that the 30th April is fast but makes sense when most the of the actual tough questions on F-111 and HUG programs was discussed in detail (and with industry involvement) in the parliamentary report from last year by the Joint Standing Committee on FA, D &T.
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       2/19/2008 2:53:53 AM
I would be more concerned if they didn't have a review.
 
Any new minister, or manager for that matter, should take some time to determine where things are at, where they are going and whether or not a new direction would be a smart move.
 
I suppose it's now wait and see what the report says and whether the government follow its recommendations.  It will also be extremely interesting to see if the advice / opinions of some in the ADF and public service will change now we have a new government.
 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Comms       4/18/2008 11:41:51 AM
From News.com.au

For what it's worth;

Rudd set to order 100 Stealth fighters

April 17, 2008 08:30pm

THE Rudd Government is set to proceed with a $16 billion order for up to 100 futuristic stealth fighter jets.

A high-level review of the nation's air combat capability, due out later this month, will give the green light to the controversial F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) project.

The review was commissioned by Defence Minister Joel Fitzgibbon and according to defence insiders it will also recommend that the government delay the final decision to sign up to the U.S.-built plane so it can push for a lower price.

Such a delay, which experts say could save taxpayers up to $750 million, is made possible due to the Howard Government's decision to buy 24 Boeing Super Hornet fighters to fill any potential "capability gaps" between 2011, when the F-111 fleet retires and 2014 when the JSF was due in service.

However, a senior executive from the builder, U.S. aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, yesterday warned that any delay could actually push up the price.

The firm's business development vice-president Robert Weiss said "stability in commitment" was important in delivering the multi-role fighter at the lowest price.

The JSF is being developed in conjunction with 18 other nations and Lockheed is looking to Australia to show leadership in our region for its introduction.

"We are looking at ways to provide all the coalition partners with stability in the pricing," Mr Weiss told News Limited.

"So in order to do that, it requires stability in the commitment of the partners as well, to provide that stable pricing.

"And the other side of that, it requires the partners to stay with the current production profile (schedule)."

Lockheed wants a firm decision by the Government next year and has pledged to deliver four F-35s in 2013, eight in 2014 and 15 in 2015.

"Given what we do know about Australian requirements ... it certainly seems to us the F-35 is the right solution," Mr Weiss said.

The government has the option of buying more Super Hornets to cover any further gaps created by the early retirement of the RAAF's fleet of ageing F/A-18 Hornet fighters.

That would allow it to further delay the JSF delivery date beyond 2014 and to press for an even lower price.

Unlike civilian aircraft contracts, military aircraft cost more for early customers.

Australia was due to be one of the first non-American forces to fly the so called fifth-generation stealth fighter.

Mr Fitzgibbon will continue to push the US Congress for access to the high cost F-22 Raptor aircraft which has longer range and greater capability than the JSF, but is much more expensive to buy and operate.

Other countries, including Britain and Italy, have also expressed serious concerns over slippage in the cost and delivery schedules of the fighter.

Lockheed Martin has been lobbying furiously in Canberra to show that its cost and delivery schedules remained on target despite serious misgivings from US government auditors.

 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/19/2008 6:55:41 AM

From News.com.au

For what it's worth;.


considering that things are still under review, then that's a highly enthusiastic call.....
 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain       4/19/2008 8:00:44 AM



From News.com.au

For what it's worth;.



considering that things are still under review, then that's a highly enthusiastic call.....

"...according to defence insiders..."

Not if theres been a leak.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/19/2008 4:31:49 PM


"...according to defence insiders..."

Not if theres been a leak.


which would be a brave thing to do given the internal enail that was co-signed by the Secretary and CDF and sent to everyone last week.....
 
Quote    Reply

Aussie Comms       4/19/2008 5:27:11 PM





"...according to defence insiders..."

Not if theres been a leak.




which would be a brave thing to do given the internal enail that was co-signed by the Secretary and CDF and sent to everyone last week.....

Yea well, as a general rule, when there is smoke, it is usually a sign, that there is a fire


 
Quote    Reply

Aussiegunneragain       4/20/2008 1:42:00 AM





"...according to defence insiders..."

Not if theres been a leak.




which would be a brave thing to do given the internal enail that was co-signed by the Secretary and CDF and sent to everyone last week.....

Who said that a leak needs to be unauthorised? There might just be a bit of softening up going on, prior to the inevitable back down on the pre-election bluster. Alternatively the implied threats about delaying F-35 purchases and possible extra SH purchases in lieu of some F-35's, might be for LM's "benefit". 
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/20/2008 3:17:37 AM

Who said that a leak needs to be unauthorised?

The directive came from PM&C. CDF and SecDept are just doing the handoff @ PM&C's direction.

No one in their right mind will be defying PM&C. If they're that stupid then they deserve to lose their jobs..
and it still doesn't change the fact that nothings finalised and all they are doing is making a self generated and education specific guess at this point in time.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/20/2008 3:27:06 AM


Yea well, as a general rule, when there is smoke, it is usually a sign, that there is a fire


again, no decision has been made and discussion is ongoing...  there would be tell tale signs via activity in other projects - and none of that is happening.  so BAU.

it would have been a safer call to spin a line end of May - but middle April?  it's a punt.
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       4/20/2008 3:49:04 AM
gf it almost sounds like you are an insider on this one.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       4/20/2008 5:14:50 AM

gf it almost sounds like you are an insider on this one.


my posting on forums has dropped right off for a number of reasons. I also don't talk to journos without getting prior approval now, and I definitely don't speak out of shop.
 
change of job, change of attitude and a definite change in participation rate... :)

as I said before, anyone who choses to ignore a clear directive from the levels that have been reinforcing whats available to talk about (zip, nada, nyet etc....), deserve all the hurt that will be visited upon them....
 
I see nothing, say nothing, and hear nothing.that could compromise something
 
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy