Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Australia Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: oerlikon guns v .50cal
thruster    10/1/2007 10:42:39 PM
gday all. after visiting this site regularly for sometime, i thought i'd take the opportunity to write my first post here. my question to you all is why do you think the RAN has gone for the .50cal as secondary shorter range weapon, when there must be tons of 20mm oerlikon guns left over from the war? im not bagging the .50cal, i believe its a superb weapon, but in the naval asymmetric setting i'd of thought the extra range and weight of fire from a flex mounted oerlikon would be more significant. im interested in your thoughts. cheers.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
thruster       10/4/2007 4:20:26 AM
hi, thanks for your responses. my knowledge on these things is very rudementary, so im learning things too.

i mentioned the oerlikon mostly considering that surely there must crates of them buried in some storage dungeon somewhere from WW2 (each vessel carried 'at least' 2, and i dont believe theyre all clapped out). they were used effectively in the AA role so it'll work in the fast asymmetric defence scenario.

but more importantly i cant see the sense in a .50cal in the naval arena (RHIBs sure, but not on sea going ships). i think the fact that we use .50s is a throwback logic from the 70s era ("it'll only be used for shots over a bow anyway"), and doesnt consider the radicalism of todays asymmetric environment.

in the naval setting, a 20mm oerlikon gifts the ship a meaningfully greater defensive radius and its impact is far more significant than a .50.  youve already got a gun jockey swinging on flex mounted .50, just give him a 20mm (hopefully for nothing cos theres heaps of oerlikons sitting in crates, if not how much is a handful of simple 20-25mm gunna cost??).

re the ammo, cant comment but it opens up a whole new world doesnt it?

a 20mm has gotta be the cheapest insurance policy on the planet, its about time the RAN reconsidered this issue.

cheers all. :-)

 
Quote    Reply

AMTP10F       10/4/2007 7:54:29 AM
The Navy is going 25mm Typhoon and 50 cal Mini Typhoon in a big way. Having seen them in action I'm more than satisfied that they would work a treat on some fast moving trouble makers.
 
Quote    Reply

doggtag       10/4/2007 10:10:14 AM
I'm willing to bet all those several hundreds (thousands even?) of Oerlikon 20mm weren't so much clapped out as they were scrapped out.
There probably were, post-WW2, more and more of them crated up as the USN, RN, and others started wider adoption of 40mm Bofors guns in twin, quad, even 8 gun mounts, as well as the 76mm automatic guns with their early proximity fuzed ammo (at the time, the engineers could only manage to get a functional fuze down to 76mm sized.
 
Sure, there were numerous second- and third-tier navies that would've kept some 20mm's around, but as SAMs became more commonplace, those guns most likely found either the scrap heap & were smeltered down, or became part of some landfill or coral reef somewhere.
 
Matter of fact, the current German Navy did use 20mm guns until fairly recently, but Rheinmetall Rh202 derivatives I believe.
Those and the 40mm guns, on just about every German Navy vessel equipped so, have been replaced by the BK27 in its MLG27 naval mount, or are in the process of doing so now.
 
(MLG 27 link direct from Rheinmetall DeTec)
 
From time to time, we've gotten into numerous debates on here about ship gunnery.
 
I always liked the "Chicago Piano", the quad 28mm Hudson gun, used in the early days of WW2 by the USN. Apparently a real POS by what can be found about it,
but my imagination getting the better of me suggests a modern variant, but as a quad BK27 mount instead...
 
On a few occasions, 25mm guns came up, and I mentioned the now-defunct 25mm ADEN gun that the UK was developing for their AV-8B variants. Development there fell thru, but not before I discovered (late 1980s-early1990s?) two different CIWS proposals.
One was a quad (barrels arranged 2 up, 2 across) system called Sea Dragon or Sea Draken or something of the sort.
Another was called Trident and featured three guns (made me think of the WW2 Japanese triple 25mm mountings, whicheven if somewhat successful, were also POS's compared to Allied AA guns (20 & 40mm).
 
Everyone knows of Phalanx,
but how many know of the Spanish Navy's Meroka, a 12-barrel behemoth (two rows of six barrels each). ?
I understand its operational principle (how all twelve barrels actually work together), but I want to watch it for myself to believe it actually does work!
Here's an interesting website on Spanish Navy CIWS, (it's in Spanish, though, and Babelfish just don't do it justice for you English-only folks).   http://www.militar.org.ua/mili...
 
It mentions development at one time of a 30mm Meroka, with 16 barrels arranged in a 4x4 layout.
I would love to see how the reloading would be done there, and how fast.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/5/2007 12:47:42 AM
pulled from Bug via T5C .......
 
---------------------------------------------------------------
 
As if this new Merkava Mk IV BAZ is not armed enough, we now have a LASER gun added to the R-OWS (Remote Over Head Weapons System) that is able to defeat and 'neutralize' Both IED and the newer EFP road side anti vehicle bombs. This system saw combat last year on Merkava APC's called Namer (Leopard) and was successfully deployed and neutralized many Hezbo road side devices. It is now being installed on Stryker and Up-Armed HUMVEE vehicles in both Iraq & Afghanistan as well as Merkava Mk IV BAZ MBT's right on the Tel Hashomer assembly line outside Tel Aviv.


THOR R-OWS with Chain Gun and Chemical anti IED Laser Gun

The directed energy beam from the laser is capable of rapidly clearing unexploded ordnance and defeating IED / EFP's by inducing a low-order burning or deflagration reaction in the explosive fill at a safe stand-off ranges (see photo above). THOR uses powerful, air cooled Chemical Laser, measuring up to 700 watts. The kinetic energy from the 12.7mm bullet fired by the M2 functions as a standoff disrupter, destroying fusing, thick-cased munitions & booby traps. The M2 machine gun also provides accurate, direct fire upon enemy forces & targets in either an offensive or defensive role.
 
Quote    Reply

Barracuda       10/7/2007 12:43:08 AM
Why don't we keep the Bofors from the Fremantle Class.  I was watching Sea Patrol, potentially the finest drama about the Navy, since JAG.
 
With two shots they achieved quite spectacular results, huge explosion, disabled the ships engine room and two bad guys managed to walk out unscathed and surrender.
 
Surely the Bofor's is a much better piece of kit.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

ThePuss       10/7/2007 1:22:40 AM

The Navy is going 25mm Typhoon and 50 cal Mini Typhoon in a big way. Having seen them in action I'm more than satisfied that they would work a treat on some fast moving trouble makers.


Yet another F'ing system I now have to F'ing maintain!. Real fun to play with though. My barge got them recently for our upcoming dash for cash run, and now all the dibbies are sad because the gameboy operators get to shoot their guns and they still have to clean them, quite funny really!.
 
Quote    Reply

Volkodav       10/7/2007 7:00:13 AM
Well maybe if the dibbies stayed in school longer than year 4 they might have been able to get a more interesting job.
 
They can still man the rails with their Styers and minimi's to repel boarders though.
 
Quote    Reply

thruster       10/14/2007 2:26:39 AM
hi there

by coincidence ive just stumbled across a short vid of a firing 20mm Hispano. im not trying to specifically rehash this point but i will venture ( cos i cant help myself) to suggest that defending a ship with this, is better than with a .50cal. as i think the vid demonstrates.

anyway, i thought you may be interested.

(im still new to all this) so go to militarphotos.com and look for the 20mm Hispano link.

cheers always. :-)

 
Quote    Reply

Nichevo       10/14/2007 6:14:29 AM
In discussions of the GECAL .50, I had understood the .50 cartridge to be ballistically superior to the 20mm round; flatter shooting or longer ranged, perhaps.  Might this be a consideration?  Absent computer-directed fire, it might increase hit probability, esp. with higher cyclic.  The logistics would also be lighter for the .50 but this might matter little for shipboard duty.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       10/14/2007 6:36:28 AM

In discussions of the GECAL .50, I had understood the .50 cartridge to be ballistically superior to the 20mm round; flatter shooting or longer ranged, perhaps.  Might this be a consideration? 

There are 20mm sniper systems available, so I'm not so sure the issue of wandering trajectory applies.  Maybe that part round has a load curiosity....
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy