Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Prediction Market Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Obama will be a one term president.
SYSOP    11/11/2008 7:39:57 PM
Obama will be a one term president. Enter a more detailed explanation of the event. Give your thoughts of why or why not you think the even will happen. Let people know why you think this is important. This will posted to the message boards automatically.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
ker    Big Uneasy   8/30/2010 9:25:37 PM
NY Times editorial page asks what O's econ policy is.  Confidence building is needed but O's "promises keeped" have people more confused than confedent.  How do people write the healthcare bill into their bugets?  No one knows yet because adminisrtative rules still being writon.  If at this point team O launch a new idea people ask why havent you done this yet?  If he stands by legeslative tropheys he is saying, "It could be worce!"
 
Why do people of LA feel W did a better job with Katrina than O did with BP spill.  W sent helos.  O shut down the oil industry just when BP shut down the turist industry.  Europinian unemploment rates until the goverment capitulates and belives the purpuse of macro economics is to serve micro ecconomics.  All politics is local and all real ecconomics is micro.
 
Dem message drifting towards conforting party insiders.  Vote for us cause we can't stand the thought of GOP subpoenas!
 
Dems building some hope around the fact they have more moeny in their official party war chests.  That message clashes with all their complaints that moeny is dirty and the GOP have way to much.  If GOP have to much and Dems have more...I'm just say'n.  In a post stim mental/emotional landscape bragging about spending more than GOP off message.  If Dems go positive they look at best empty handed.  If they go negetive wile at the same time crying about the negetive Republicans it's a self canceling mesage.  Moeny is no substitue for a message.  A very good message can go viral and get around some of the need for moeny.  Lots of moeny behind a failed message is just a faster ride to defeat.  Did I mention it's getting pretty late to pull a new message out of the hat.
 
You don't half to vote against me because I'm a Dem.  I have already been votting against Rear, Pelosy and O for you.  Pelosy is giving Dems premision to attack her in their ads.  She is not giving them premision to make the logical next step and promise to vote agaisnt her with their organizational vote if they are returned.  She is telling them to not dis O in ads any more. 
 
Look out for the pocket protector Republicans.  They can do math and arn't ashamed to admit it.  A pocket protector is the new green eye shade.  Some of thesse guys couldn't get ellected in most years but the Dems are down and Dem attacks are aimed at cultural firebrands.  So some Republican starts calmly talking about bugets and the moral failings of not bugeting and voters see a solution to their delema. 
 
Quote    Reply

ker    My work is done here.   8/30/2010 10:16:01 PM
Charles Blow on Morning Joe, Beck "is part of what I see as the retorical assasination of a good man."
 
Yes,  I see his point.  I am still waiting for the Dems to see the "chickens comming home to roost" with them.  What is the last fight the Dems won or lost with out painting their oposition as imoral?  They cry wolf every time some one gets a few points up in the pols on them. 
 
People lie about O.  Dan Rather lied about W.  Did O ever mention that using forged documents against W was bad form.  Attempting to glue W's millitairy discharge to his forhead is no so unlike glueing O birth records to his forehead.  They should both stop.  Lets not hold our breath though.
 
In the same way calling O a Marxist is only helping the real Marxists apear more credibal than they are.  They by the way think he is a CORPORATIST and thats the nice way to put it. 
-----------------------------------
Nika of Morning Joe is amazed that Becks half a million cracker march wasn't "crazy violent" and that they looked like nice people.  If I said that I was suprised that the Promise Keepers could hold large meetings and not be violent or crude there would be something wrong with me.
 
Now, I would be perfectly happy to see some one eat Becks lunch.  His only redeaming trick for me is that he shows how the Dems wine when you use their own tools against them.  He isn't credibal as a theologian. 
-----------------------------------
It's time for a change in style.  This thread has been all about how O is doing what W did but not as well.  It's the same game played to the other side of the room. 
 
Theams of this thread have been "what W was O is,"
 
The irony abouse and casual derision press heeped on W would come around to O is time.  I thought it would take longer.
 
We should respond to the absurd with the absurd. 
 
Thought and speach should not be intemidated by the utopian bugger flingers and libral scolds.
 
The professional press isn't.  Rather Glass Mathews Oh My. 
 
Shooting the mesanger is not leadership.
 
There are dangers in writing this way.  Statements you make in even slightly public ways change your preceptions and reactions to event.  Every event becomes another oportunity to slam the target.  The purpuse of each new observation is to prove your past observations correct and valuable.  Doing this professionaly in a highly competitive market must be something like brain washing.
--------------------------
Switchfoot - Politicians   
(Oh, Oh, Oh,)

Everything is broken, Everything is broken,
Everything is breaking down, breaking down

Everything is bleeding, Everything is bleeding,
Everything is breaking down, breaking down

I pledge allegiance to a country without borders,
Without Politicians, Watching for my sky to get torn apart

We are broken, we are bitter, we're the problem,
We're the Politicians, Watching for our sky to get torn apart

(Come on and break me)

Entropy and aching, Where have we been aiming?
Everything is fading now, Fading now

We are the faded, Splintered and sedated
Everything is fading now, Fading now

I pledge allegiance to a country without borders,
Without Politicians, Watching for my sky to get torn apart

We are broken, we are bitter, we're the problem,
We're the Politicians, Watching for our sky to get torn apart

(Come on and break me) (Come on and break me)

Oh! Oh!

I pledge allegiance to a country without borders,
Without Politicians, Politicians, Politicians,

I am broken, I am bitter!
I'm the problem, I'm the Politician,
Watching for my sky to get torn apart

(Come on and break me) (Come on and break me)
 
Quote    Reply

ker    Ecco-Terorist    9/2/2010 9:53:16 PM
Lone Ecco-Terorist makes fighter bomber hostage taking attack on TV station.  Fringe envirmental lobby widly scolded for inciting violance.  Or maybe not.  Lets start a pool on how many more Gulf oil rigs burn before say November.
--------------
The bad war.  I think the Spanish American war was the bad one.  I'm funny like that.
 
War is a scurge and a curse on man kind.  We each have a moral oblogation to reduce war.  Thats why I find reflexive belife in moral equivalance and habitual calls for proportionate violance imoral due there tendancy to prepetuate war indefenatly.  Proportionate violance, like ineffective punishment, is among the most cruel things on earth.  Never give someone a small wound.  For violance to be moraly justified it must be decisive. 
 
Thinking of discreat times of war and peace is counterprodutive at this junture.  We want to instead think of regions of peace which can be expanded and regions of war.  Wars may lay dormate but sometimes they end.  Pushing the war into a dormate state must not be confused with ending it.  On the otherhand pushing it into dormancy or pushing it out of dormancy can both be tactics for moving towards the end of a given pattern of war.  Tempo changes are sometimes good tools. 
 
The war burden which the human race carries is in fact larger than commenly understood.  I could repeat the Cross of Iron argument here.  Ike was talking about the goods spent to make war.  I am more focused on the goods not created due to the presence of war dormant or otherwise.  I am thinking much less about the high profiles attacks and the rebuilding afterwards and more about the low profile continuse threats that prevent the simplist forms of building in the first place.  Why can't Nujood read?
 
Well she wrote a book, I Am Nujood, Age 10 and Divorced, but you get my point. 
 
I was talking to a fling buggers for peace sort of guy.  He didn't reconize that the bombing of Bagdad and the bombing of Berlin were fundementaly different.  It was willful historical illiteracy in the service of utopian recklessness. 
 
The people of Iraq were the slaves of Sadom.  Now they are not.  If you want to quible about how Lincon lied about Fort Sumter then you have fun with that. 
 
What greator problems would we have with Irans exporting war if Sadom was still n the mix?  How would Sadom be a buffer between us and Irainian nukes?  Would Sadom really compeat with A-Jab for who could make the most belicose statements against our interests?  The middle east is complecated now but it could be much much worce if we had not acted forcefuly. 
-------------
Mathews was ragging on O for reading a telaprompter poorly in the Oval office address.  Will some one tell him his material is dated.  For all the appologies that O is famuse for the most famuse one will be the one he makes to W.
 
 
Quote    Reply

ker    Burning For You.   9/7/2010 9:20:38 PM
 
Quote    Reply

ker    O2.Oh No   10/14/2010 10:52:34 PM
O was hoping that fear would work again. Fear of Republicansand their moeny that is.  But that plan is passing away too.
----------------------------------------------------
"I'm not a whitch. I'm nothing you have heard. I'm you."
 
The optimal outcome for GOP in Senate is:
49R 49D 1I self discribed "democratic socialist" Senator Sanders  1 Independent Senator  Lieberman
By my count thats the over under.  The most probibal outcome.
 
The House strategy for O is to raise expectations.  "It could have been so much worce."
----------------------------------------------------
Biden, "It's too hard to explain."   Then you should have done something simpler!
---------------------------------------------------
O, "no such thing as a sovel ready project." The shovel to ready ratio was all shovel and just as unready as we told you he would be.  No surprise.  O saying, if I had only known goverment is slow is like Bill saying, if I had only known they were killing people in Rwanda.  The only reason raideo intercepts from Rwanda wern't in Bill morning breifing was that he made it perfectly clear he didn't want to hear it.  They teach you to shovel only one thing in Harvard Law and it ain't a building material.  Shovel ready was always a code for short cutting standard procegures for letting contracts and their by creating more fredom for back scraching.
 
O, I'm not "same old tax and spend Democrat." He put them all to shame by taxing and spending more than they ever imagined.  Please not the taxes are not implemented quite yet but he sighned them.  What did he think he was trying to look like?  Ross Perot.
Maybe self awareness and image awareness and brand dicipline are out side his skill sets? Which leads us too.....
 
Aragant focuse onn policy and neglect of PR "blowing from the top."  The policy was bad dog food and the people didn't like it no matter how hard you cramed it down their gullit.  Acedemics are allowed to say that democracy dosn't work because people don't know whats good for them but thats a hard sell for the leader of a political party.  Thats not playing to win it's prepairing your excuses for failure.  It's PR.  Not real good PR but flailing to explain self.  O continual campain was continual PR and politics.  The only time he stoped selling him self was when he scared him self with how bad he was at it.  When he complained that the GOP didn't have any ideas that was spin. Selling votes isn't policy it politics. O saying that his failures were due to not being attentive to PR is like Napoleon Bonaparte blaming his failures no not being attentive enough to Military Affairs.
 
O also spins his curant straits as a positive.  Weather or not the GOP wins or fails his job is going to get easyer.  He won't half to change.  GOP magoritys will be compelled to give in to him or GOP minoritys will be compealed to give into him.  It's a slight vareation on one of his earlyer fantacys.  He promised to be an forceful progresive and to end political strife.  He was going to steam roller over the GOP and get them to thank him for it.  His beer sumit out reach was all spin and no substance/policy compromise.  GOP said you can piss down our legs but you can't tell us it's raining and the rest is history.  All beer and no sumit.
All PR and no plan. Maybe it's time for O to stop complaing that the GOP ain't serious and get serious himself.
 
Now O says he should have not cut taxes so than when the GOP forced tax cuts it would look like bypartison compromise.  In truth O cut taxes to avoid the humiliation of having a by partison majority cut taxes over his protests.  He didn't cut taxes as a gift to the GOP.  He cut taxes as a nessairy act of PR self defence.  It was a nessairy survival stratigy.  If he haden't cut taxes before a GOP lead by partison majority forced him to cut taxes he would look like twice the tax and spend cleshay he looks now.
----------------------
Shepard "I made the Hope poster" Fairey is losing hope.
---------------------
So it's 94 again but....   O is on recorde slaming Bill for small ball / triangulation.  That something else O has incomen with W.
 
O dosn't have the same base as Bill or the same gift for losing his butt and keeping his head.  Skills and instinks are different.  Also GOP got hit on the head with that safe before and might have learn something.  Newts failures were
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy