Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: LAW Goes Back to the Future
James Dunnigan    11/25/2005 11:48:32 PM


The U.S. military is bringing back an ?obsolete,? four decade old anti-tank weapon because it is a cheaper, and more portable, way to provide the infantry with some ?portable artillery.? The Department of Defense is buying 6,399 LAW (Light Anti-tank Weapon). Many training rounds are being bought as well. These 7.7 pound, one-shot (the launcher is disposable) anti-tank rockets were a replacement for the World War II bazooka (similar to the Russian designed RPG). However, by the 1970s, it was obvious that the LAW was not able to kill most modern tanks, and in late 1980s, was replaced by the AT4. However, the heavier (15 pounds), and more expensive AT4 ($2,700 per each disposable launcher and four pound warhead) is also larger (40 inches long and 3.3 inches in diameter.) Since American troops rarely faced enemy tanks, but did frequently need some additional firepower to deal with enemy infantry in bunkers or buildings, the AT4 was seen as a step backwards.

The LAW has several advantages. It is compact (20 inches long, 2.6 inches in diameter), light (7.7 pounds) and cheap (about $2,000 each). It?s 2.2 pound warhead can still knock out light armored vehicles (and unarmored ones as well), but it most often used against enemy troops inside bunkers and buildings. For that job, the U.S. Department of Defense had bought the SMAW (Shoulder-Launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon). This was a 17 pound Israeli design (in response to the RPG). But the SMAW launcher costs $14,000, and each rocket costs more than their RPG equivalents (and are a bit more effective.) Actually, many troops have expressed an interest in just getting the RPG, which has a larger (6 pound) warhead, and is a lot cheaper (the RPG launcher goes for about $500 each, and the rockets can be had for under a hundred dollars each). However, the compactness of the LAW, and better accuracy, does make a difference on the battlefield, and is considered worth the cost. The LAW is simple, light, easy-to-use and relatively cheap. It?s hard to improve on that, which is why the LAW is making a comeback. Actually, it never went away in many other armies.


 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Theo    RE:LAW Goes Back to the Future   11/28/2005 3:24:37 PM
I fought as a 11b10 with the 101st Abn in Viet Nam during Op Texas Star and the battle of Ripcord in 1970. I always felt the LAW was an inferior weapon compared to the RPG. It was good at keeping the enemys heads down during an assualt, but that was about it in my opinion as an anti-personel weapon. I felt the same about the 60mm grenade launcher, others might have different views. Theo link
 
Quote    Reply

Pars    RE:LAW Goes Back to the Future   11/28/2005 4:46:29 PM
LAW never went away in Turkish army but now RPG is more preferred for obvious financial reasons.
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy