The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 25, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Combat Reveals Defects in the M1 Tank
James Dunnigan    7/20/2005 1:01:30 AM


Combat usually reveals weaknesses in armored
vehicles, weaknesses that no amount of testing can reveal. The extensive use of
the American M1 tank in Iraq has demonstrated, once more, how true this is.
Several weaknesses in the M1 were revealed after extensive use under combat
conditions. On the outside of the tank, the bore evacuator, which vents toxic
gas from the gun barrel, was made of fiberglass. In combat, it was easy for the
bore evacuator to catch fire. When that happened, noxious gasses would get into
the tank, forcing the crew to bail out. It was also discovered that the side
and rear armor of the M1 was thin enough for some RPGs to get lucky, and
penetrate into the crew compartment. This sometimes revealed another flaw. The
automatic Halon fire extinguisher system was not able to handle many fires,
meaning the crew had to get out. These flaws, and several others, were duly
noted, and fixed (or are being fixed), but they are a reminder that no matter
how well designed or tested your tanks are, once in heavy combat, over a long
period, flaws will emerge.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

5/68 AR    RE:Combat Reveals Defects in the M1 Tank   7/20/2005 11:30:26 AM
Regarding the bore evacuator fires and Halon extinguisher activations in a combat situation...assuming no major flames/heat after such situations, what would prevent the crew from donning their protective masks and hooking up to the GPU (gas particulate unit, or are the latest protective masks not canister & hose type, like the M-25's of my day)? And how quickly could the turret blower clear the compartments? I was an M-60A3 tanker (19E10) who transitioned to the M-1 for about 6 months before PCSing in 1989. At Ft. Knox I saw one unintentional Halon activation in the motor pool, and that crew baled out in record time. But in combat...that's a whole other situation. Can anyone give info on the crew actions following the above situations? Thanks, John Toutant "Grey Lion" 5/68 AR Mannheim, FRG 1985-87
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy