Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The Military Morale Myth
James Dunnigan    11/2/2003 8:23:49 PM
Despite the large number of reservists and National Guard troops mobilized for Afghanistan and Iraq, troops are staying in uniform. The Army National Guard, which has had the largest proportion of troops called up, has so far only lost ten percent of troops to attrition (not re-enlisting) among units returning from overseas. The normal rate of attrition, for all National Guard units, is 17 percent. What is probably keeping the re-enlistment rate up is efforts by the army to get reservists off active duty, and making plans to limit the active duty time in the future. Last week, for example, the number of reservists on active duty fell another 1,289, to 157,605. But that number is going up in the next few months, as units are called up for training, and movement to Iraq to replace reservists coming home. Meanwhile, the number of new recruits for the active army, and the army reserve and National Guard, continue match needs. For the fourth year in a row, the army met its annual goal for new recruits. In the past year, 74,132 men and women enlisted (against a goal of 73,800.) The army reserve for 27,365 (against a goal of 26,400.) A number of things are at work here. First, it's important to remember that American troops don't hesitate to gripe when things are rough. It's an ancient military tradition. But once out of danger, morale makes a remarkable (and pretty predictable) come back. And then there is the unemployment issue. Many (the army isn't saying how many, and they probably don't know) troops were unemployed when they were called up. All of a sudden they were employed again, although if the unemployment rate continues to go down, going on active duty will be even more unpopular. But the high unemployment rate, and uncertain economy, causes troops to stay in the reserves, and on active duty. Finally, there's patriotism. There is an enemy out there trying to kill Americans. While this is hardly World War II, we did have another Pearl Harbor and many of the troops have not forgotten September 11, 2001.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
Thomas    RE:macawman    2/4/2004 3:18:27 AM
You are illustrating excatly what I'm talking about. NG/Home Guard units demand leadership of higher quality than a usual unit and your colonel seems to a man it would be a pleasure to serve under. The problem is that Guardsmen are very much under their own control - if they set high standard for themselves they can achieve very good results; but they can get away with almost anything if they do not bother. My advice is write to your congressman, they are voter and casualty sensitive. You won't gain anything personally from it, but you just might be able to do some good for the NG. Write plainly about the problems and emphasise the good units. I'll tell you a story: When one of the District Commander in The Danish Home Guard died, his successor had one major problem: Funding was related to active volunteers, so you could not retire - he wouldn't let you - rather just have your name on the roster and you not showing up FOR DECADES. That wasn't the real embarassement. His successor found a considerable number of volunteers on the active list, that had actually been dead FOR YEARS. By mistake some dead members actually got long service medals posthumusly - crediting them years of service as dead, buried and cremated.
 
Quote    Reply

1stcavman    RE:The Military Morale Myth   2/7/2004 7:38:29 PM
I served both active duty (guess what division I fought with in the Gulf War) and in the reserves, and I can affirmatively state there is no mad dash to the door to leave the service. However, troops are fed up with the constant deployments and there is a feeling that the Army should increase it's size to meet requirements and be prepared for contingencies. I would suggest that the Army increase from 10 divisions to 12 divisions, with one division being mech and the other light.
 
Quote    Reply

Condor Legion    RE:The Military Morale Myth   2/7/2004 8:33:56 PM
I've been saying three more divisions ever since the Clinton era. But what do I know, I'm an "armchair strategie." ..., CL
 
Quote    Reply

macawman    RE:The Military Morale Myth   2/7/2004 11:14:13 PM
The DoD is not increasing the division numbers but is increasing the number of Bdes per division from 33 to 48 by year 2007. Typically each division will have 5 Bdes, one at home station, two in the field, two in transition. link
 
Quote    Reply

Horsesoldier    RE:The Military Morale Myth   2/9/2004 11:18:32 AM
>>I served both active duty (guess what division I fought with in the Gulf War) and in the reserves, and I can affirmatively state there is no mad dash to the door to leave the service. << My unit does not seem to have hit a 22% departure rate, but it has lost more personnel after a year of active duty than you would normally suspect. If you included the personnel that are being protected from medical review boards (and are no longer physically fit to do their jobs, per army regulations) by means fair and foul and such, we'd probably lose a quarter of the unit to medical retirements, routine ETS, and guys getting out to go active duty or to other reserve units (those last don't count from a DoD perspective, I imagine, but certainly pinch down at the company/troop/battery level).
 
Quote    Reply

Horsesoldier    THE WAY THINGS REALLY WORK: Real National Guard Numbers   2/12/2004 6:56:12 AM
>>The four percent of troops who are getting called up again and again may not be inclined to re-enlist, but the vast majority have no problem with staying in uniform. << Was it Mark Twain who mentioned lies, damn lies, and statistics . . . except the author of this little piece does not have any statistics to back up his "nothing to see here, everything is fine" premise. As I noted a while back, everything appears to not be fine. One in four reservists leaving the force is not a "vast majority having no problem staying in uniform." And, again, the author of this misses the point. It is not deployments that are driving most of the people I know who are leaving the National Guard to do so, it is the corruption, stagnant promotion system, and incompentence of leadership. Saying there is no problem does not fix the problem.
 
Quote    Reply

macawman    RE:THE WAY THINGS REALLY WORK: National Guard political cronyism!!   2/12/2004 2:33:46 PM
The games Lt.G.W.Bush played with attendance figures while suppossedly doing alternate training in the Alabama ANG is just the 'tip of the iceberg' when it comes to cronyism of a select politically elite few in the Guard during the Vietnam War. The NG General(ret.) on the Lehrer News Hours said last night that the National Guard has changed since the 70's but he did not say if it was for the better. I find it hard to believe that GWs commanding officer in Alabama was a Col.Turnipseed??
 
Quote    Reply

Horsesoldier    SPC Ryan Anderson and the need to maintain personnel numbers . . .   2/14/2004 10:06:11 AM
I'm curious to see what else we're going to find out about SPC Ryan Anderson besides his apparent proclivity towards betraying his country and fellow soldiers. Specifically, did no one in his unit key into something interesting going on with this guy somewhere between the conversion to Islam and his recent arrest? Having seen NG units try to sweep DUIs, domestic violence, and other criminal charges under the rug to keep the good old boys in the ranks and keep the numbers up, I would not be suprised to find out that someone, at some point in the chain of command, had some reservations about this guy but were unable to do anything about it due to the command environment endemic to all states requiring units do everything they can to keep warm bodies in uniform and keep the federal funds rolling in. (Or, of course, in some unusual cases, keeping rather cold, and deceased, bodies on the roster, to keep the same funding.)
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy