Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Russia Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Could The Russians Conduct A Surprise Invasion Of Poland?
CJH    8/22/2008 5:50:50 PM
How Would The Russians Conduct A Surprise Invasion Of Poland? Could they do it? What subterfuge would be necessary in order to minimize the chance of opposition? Would The Russians have to invade Ukraine, Lithuania or Belarus in order to succeed? Would they initiate their assault from Kaliningrad and support their spearhead with forces arriving through Latvia and Lithuania?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3   NEXT
Stranger Danger    Like a Tom Clancy Novel   8/30/2008 1:54:43 PM
CJH, you just described a book by Tom Clancy called "Red Storm Rising". But in the Novel, the Soviets plant a bomb in the Kremlin, then turn around and accuse the West Germans of trying to assassinate the Politburo.
 
Which, being said, would not be a bad provocation to invade Poland, To bring the "Assassians" to justice, etc.
 
The Russian's already have a formula for invading countries, taking over the airports via special forces, etc.
 
All in all, I think it would be highly unlikely that Russia would invade any other eastern european countries. The Georgian "conflict" has tipped their hand too much, letting everyone know that they want to be the big, bad regional power.
 
Quote    Reply

historynut       8/30/2008 3:42:14 PM
Pakistan which is a lot poorer then Poland developed nukes to defend themselfs from a much larger India. Poland has more money and more skilled people then Pakistan so it seems like they could either build or buy nukes of there own.
 
NATO and/or the US could intervene to stop Russia or we could leave Poland on the own to defend themselfs. With NATO and/or the US helping Poland your talking about a conventional war.
 
Poland left on there own could take one look at Pakistan and decide that nuke's are the only way they could prevent Russia from attacking Poland.
 
So NATO could either find oil and gas someplace else or get used to liveing under radioactive fallout.
 
Quote    Reply

Knjaz       8/31/2008 4:29:34 AM

I am sure the Kremlin has some very imaginative and creative people working for it. I can't rise to their level but I can make an attempt which at least suggests something of the kind.


Perhaps a presumably smuggled low yield nuclear device is or devices are discovered in eastern Europe/Russia. One might even be detonated somewhere. The Russians "investigate" and find some kind of connection with clandestine activity in or somehow connected to Poland. Perhaps Chechens are implicated. Perhaps the Russian or other mafia is involved. The Russians decide this is what you get with a new eastern Europe and resolve to set things right.



Im talking about the real pretext, not fabricated by Kremlin. I repeat - Moscow does NOT need Poland. If it ever gets to taking\getting back (depends on the point of view) new\old lands, on the western direction the ideal scenario would be Belarus, eastern and central Ukraine, with western Ukraine going to Poland.

Seconldy, talking about what happened in South Ossetia - i pretty well remember the attitude to Medvedev in russian internet community during the first 15 hours of Georgian invasion - everybody waited "when the f*ck he is gonna pull in our troops. What is he waiting for?! more deaths?!" - that would represent the opinion of some 80-90%.
And I can say u that if he didnt do that - not only he would lose very large part of his support, but the people of Northern Caucasus would certailnly turn away from Russia. Such decision (not to protect SO) would be a catastrophe for himself personally, and for Russia too. So, he had no choice, thats all. And no, there wasnt intention to show "how f....g strong Russia is. And that Georgia wont even think about joining NATO." Actually, it has absolutely nothing with Georgia joining NATO.

 
Quote    Reply

afrc       8/31/2008 4:02:32 PM

Im talking about the real pretext, not fabricated by Kremlin. I repeat - Moscow does NOT need Poland. If it ever gets to taking\getting back (depends on the point of view) new\old lands, on the western direction the ideal scenario would be Belarus, eastern and central Ukraine, with western Ukraine going to Poland.

I agree and disagree. Moscow does not need Poland's territory, but it probably needs Poland to prove to the Russian folks that West is evil and anti-Russian and they need to stick with the strong government that can protect them... Putin already said that Georgian war was probably organized by USA (nice!). Russian government can't find a better example than Poland: it's small and it's loudly anti-Russian, it's part of NATO and it's on the border, it hosts "aggressive" ABM system. Putin probably prays for Poland every day before he goes to bed. It's the perfect way to consolidate people around current Russian government.
Ukraine and Belarus is another matter. I can imagine some scenarios that involve Ukraine and Belarus. Pretext is easy to find - Ukraine has Crimea that historically did not belong to it at all. Eastern Ukraine leans toward Russia. There is a political instability in Ukraine that can be exploited. Belarus is almost helpless without Russia and can be absorbed into it under some circumstances... maybe if Russia threatens to cut oil and gas and forces Lukashenko to make some difficult desisions.
 

 
Seconldy, talking about what happened in South Ossetia - i pretty well remember the attitude to Medvedev in russian internet community during the first 15 hours of Georgian invasion - everybody waited "when the f*ck he is gonna pull in our troops. What is he waiting for?! more deaths?!" - that would represent the opinion of some 80-90%.

Well, I saw plenty of reasonable opinions in Russian forums and I saw plenty of cheering for direct local confrontation with US and NATO. Is it possible that some Russians were simply afraid of another Chechnya scenario with many deaths? Is it possible that after they saw that Georgian responce was weak at best they switched to "disarm and punish Georgia for the war before leaving" mood?
 
 

And I can say u that if he didnt do that - not only he would lose very large part of his support, but the people of Northern Caucasus would certailnly turn away from Russia. Such decision (not to protect SO) would be a catastrophe for himself personally, and for Russia too. So, he had no choice, thats all. And no, there wasnt intention to show "how f....g strong Russia is. And that Georgia wont even think about joining NATO." Actually, it has absolutely nothing with Georgia joining NATO.

Well, I can imagine that Russian government probably prefers pro-Russian government in Georgia... as well as breaking S Ossetia and Abkhazia from Georgia. I can imagine they hoped for anti-Saakashvili revolt after the war began and it did not happen. I can imagine them wanting to discourage countries from joining NATO when I see the way Russians react to NATO getting closer to the border. Georgia was a perfect way to demonstrate that NATO and US is useless, because they knew that US will not get into stupid war with Russia to support unautharized military gamble of Saakashvili. 
 
Quote    Reply

FlyingDutchman       9/1/2008 8:59:36 AM

I agree and disagree. Moscow does not need Poland's territory, but it probably needs Poland to prove to the Russian folks that West is evil and anti-Russian and they need to stick with the strong government that can protect them... Putin already said that Georgian war was probably organized by USA (nice!). Russian government can't find a better example than Poland: it's small and it's loudly anti-Russian, it's part of NATO and it's on the border, it hosts "aggressive" ABM system. Putin probably prays for Poland every day before he goes to bed. It's the perfect way to consolidate people around current Russian government.


Ukraine and Belarus is another matter. I can imagine some scenarios that involve Ukraine and Belarus. Pretext is easy to find - Ukraine has Crimea that historically did not belong to it at all. Eastern Ukraine leans toward Russia. There is a political instability in Ukraine that can be exploited. Belarus is almost helpless without Russia and can be absorbed into it under some circumstances... maybe if Russia threatens to cut oil and gas and forces Lukashenko to make some difficult desisions.


I agree with the remarks about Poland and the Ukraine. I can easily see Russia at least annexing the Eastern half.
 
But why Belarus? Isn't it already a puppet of Russia and fully dependent as you also wrote?
I doubt it's necessary, for now, to fully annex Belarus.
 
 
Quote    Reply

CJH       9/1/2008 11:53:28 AM
"Im talking about the real pretext, not fabricated by Kremlin. I repeat - Moscow does NOT need Poland. If it ever gets to taking\getting back (depends on the point of view) new\old lands, on the western direction the ideal scenario would be Belarus, eastern and central Ukraine, with western Ukraine going to Poland."
 
The Merriam Webster online dictionary definition of pretext - "a purpose or motive alleged or an appearance assumed in order to cloak the real intention or state of affairs".
 
So the pretext I was referring to would be a real alleged motive or a real assumed appearance. That is - I was ruling out the existence of a legitimate motive.
 
Quote    Reply

CJH       9/1/2008 11:59:12 AM
"Im talking about the real pretext, not fabricated by Kremlin."
 
Is it not plain that Russia's given reason for invading Georgia is a false one? How really credible is it that any nation can move a force the size of Russia's as quickly as it did? It seems to be evident that the invasion of Georgia by Russia was planned and set up before Russia had its given reason to invade.
 
Quote    Reply

afrc       9/1/2008 3:53:34 PM
I agree with the remarks about Poland and the Ukraine. I can easily see Russia at least annexing the Eastern half.
 
But why Belarus? Isn't it already a puppet of Russia and fully dependent as you also wrote?
I doubt it's necessary, for now, to fully annex Belarus.
 
Simple really... Russians suspect (and they are probably right) that all those small countries are unreliable and their loyalties can shift with money flow and change of administration. There is a chance that Lukashenko will be gone eventually and the new government decides to move closer to the West. The only way to make sure that Belarus stays with Russia is to absorb it into Russia... and preferably while it is still pro-Russian to avoid military solution.
 
Quote    Reply

Godofgamblers    Kurica nie ptica, Polsza nie zagranica   9/5/2008 6:35:20 AM
Dude, this would never happen. I mean there would have to be some major geopolitical shifts. However, the shifts that would be necessary are all very very possible in our lifetimes. I think it's 50/50 that Poland and Russia will share a border in the near future, and the Poles know this.
 
As for subterfuge, if you envision a 5th column.... think again. There is not really any Russian minority that would actively work on Russia's behalf for sabotage or to stir up domenstic violence thus justifying a "rescue mission". Nor is there a pro Russia minority that could be formed into an anti Polish militia. So an attack from within as in WW2 where a Silesia ethnic German militia carried out actions is not possible.
 
However, in the Ukraine, the case is different. The country is split along Russian/Ukrainian lines and although the current Political elite are mostly Ukrainian, a lot of the people in the east are ethnic Russians. Bielorus is also a big question mark. If one or both of these countries rejoined Russia, an attack on Poland could be possible.
 
I think it's quite possible the Russians would like to punish the Poles for accepting the missle shield. I am pro Polish but i belive this was a major tactical error by the Poles. They are simply stirring up a hornets' nest and a few Patriot missles are not going to make Poland safer. They are simply antagonizing Russia and pushing it toward a more aggressive foreign policy. Russia would love to have Poland as a buffer zone.
 
However, morale is major consideration. The Poles would never ever accept Russian domination again, not in this lifetime. Hell, I would get on a plane myself and head to Olsztyn to fight off the Russian hordes if they attacked. The Russians would have to make a major commitment to take Poland, but ultimately they could .
 
The Poles would base their defensive on waterways, not on the borders, to allow for maneuvering space; seek to draw the Russians into cities once river-based defences fell, to offset the Russian armored and numerical advantage. Special emphasis would be placed on the Wisla river defences to the north to protect the Gdansk port where supplies from the west would be pouring in. If no foreign aid were forthcoming from the west, i would think the Poles would eventually fall back from their river defence lines into the cities for urban combat, except to the North where an enclave around Gdansk would be maintained.
 
As in WW2, survival for the Poles would be contingent upon the west coming to their rescue. If the Russians were deadset on taking Poland, and the Poles had no help from the outside, not counting myself of course, they could not hold forever.
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

Nasty German Idiot       9/5/2008 9:15:42 AM
 
If you would bother to take a look at the Map,  the Russians could NOT invade Poland  !    Not unless they would take the Baltics first.  At this stage, Europe mobilizes ...   make no mistake about it, if there is anything that drives Europeans crazy its the f---g Russkie on your frontdoor.  Germany would throw everything East to keep the fighting away from the homeland, as would all the other European states.  Why do you think do we share a tank division with Poland ?
 

 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy