Military History
|
How To Make War
|
Wars Around the World
Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Russia
Discussion Board
Return to Topic Page
Subject:
Could The Russians Conduct A Surprise Invasion Of Poland?
CJH
8/22/2008 5:50:50 PM
How Would The Russians Conduct A Surprise Invasion Of Poland? Could they do it? What subterfuge would be necessary in order to minimize the chance of opposition? Would The Russians have to invade Ukraine, Lithuania or Belarus in order to succeed? Would they initiate their assault from Kaliningrad and support their spearhead with forces arriving through Latvia and Lithuania?
Quote
Reply
Show Only Poster Name and Title
Newest to Oldest
Pages:
1
2
3
NEXT
VelocityVector
8/22/2008 6:18:53 PM
Russia can either nuke Poland back into the Stone Age such that NATO could perceive no valid reason to intervene or else whittle the country away by stoking internal dissension until Russia gets invited to encroach. Russian leadership cannot prevail in a conventional battle against NATO, Russian losses would be so dramatic that it would shock even the Russian national conscience.
v^2
Quote
Reply
Nanheyangrouchuan
8/22/2008 9:30:03 PM
Russia can either nuke Poland back into the Stone Age such that NATO could perceive no valid reason to intervene or else whittle the country away by stoking internal dissension until Russia gets invited to encroach. Russian leadership cannot prevail in a conventional battle against NATO, Russian losses would be so dramatic that it would shock even the Russian national conscience.
v^2
I imagine that the Russians would turn off NATO's oil and gas first, limiting the ability to respond and the Europeans have no taste for a fight anyways.
Quote
Reply
CJH
8/23/2008 12:00:13 AM
Russia can either nuke Poland back into the Stone Age such that NATO could perceive no valid reason to intervene or else whittle the country away by stoking internal dissension until Russia gets invited to encroach. Russian leadership cannot prevail in a conventional battle against NATO, Russian losses would be so dramatic that it would shock even the Russian national conscience.
v^2
That begs the question as to whether our NATO allies would have the political will, given their economic interests, to fight Russia.
Quote
Reply
afrc
8/23/2008 1:04:44 AM
That begs the question as to whether our NATO allies would have the political will, given their economic interests, to fight Russia.
Well, Poland did sign ABM treaty with US despite war in Georgia and some strong posturing from Russia. Baltic states also would love to stick it to the old boss. However, the real question is what pretext would Russia use to invade Poland? The response of other NATO members will depend on moral justification and popular support. At the end all NATO countries realize that if they don't respond to protect one country when they are morally right, it will be their turn next when Russia does not like something about them. Divided we fall.
As far as interests, Russian economy benefits greatly from oil and gas sales, so both sides have something to lose from the conflict.
Russian military has no way of conducting a large ground operation without being noticed. Military buildup in Kaliningrad area will prompt an equal buildup on the other side. Russia will have more problems suppling the troops across the Baltic Sea. Russian Air Force does not have enough of the latest planes to counter NATO Air Force... especially if US sends Raptors to Europe (and there are more than 100 of them in service). Russia can try to use tactical missiles to strike Poland and prompt NATO to cross into Russia and fight in on friendly territory. All NATO has to do is destroy as much as possible (power plants, oil storages, refineries, pipelines, water systems, grain storage, railways, bridges) and let Russian Winter finish the job. Russian PVO still needs a lot of work to be able to counter a massive air strike. There will be a lot of planes lost, but it is doable. Not a good option for Russians. And once again you have nukes... but we all know how this story ends.
So it is hard to answer your question in general. One has to know all the details before starting to speculate.
Quote
Reply
CJH
8/23/2008 4:27:13 PM
I suppose that a clandestine Russian presence in Poland and its neighbors would be and probably is a fact.
Agents provocateurs might be useful for creating a pretext which would need only to remain unexposed long enough for the Russians to react. Confronted by a Russian occupation as a fait accompli, what could the West do to Russia even if the cause was suspicious?
Quote
Reply
Knjaz
8/26/2008 2:17:30 PM
It's hard to think of pretext for this invasion. Russia dont need to annex Poland. And ABM sites can be taken out by nukes or massive air assaults (of course, those Patriots in Poland greatly increases chances that nukes will be used in case of war, instead of conventional bombers).
There's nothing more that could lead to a Russian attack on Poland.
Quote
Reply
StevoJH
8/27/2008 12:48:55 PM
Russia can either nuke Poland back into the Stone Age such that NATO could perceive no valid reason to intervene or else whittle the country away by stoking internal dissension until Russia gets invited to encroach. Russian leadership cannot prevail in a conventional battle against NATO, Russian losses would be so dramatic that it would shock even the Russian national conscience.
v^2
I imagine that the Russians would turn off NATO's oil and gas first, limiting the ability to respond and the Europeans have no taste for a fight anyways.
The only reply i can think of to your "have not taste for a fight" comment, is that, isnt that what hitler thought of the British in WWII? :P
Quote
Reply
CJH
8/30/2008 12:31:28 PM
Russia can either nuke Poland back into the Stone Age such that NATO could perceive no valid reason to intervene or else whittle the country away by stoking internal dissension until Russia gets invited to encroach. Russian leadership cannot prevail in a conventional battle against NATO, Russian losses would be so dramatic that it would shock even the Russian national conscience.
v^2
I imagine that the Russians would turn off NATO's oil and gas first, limiting the ability to respond and the Europeans have no taste for a fight anyways.
The only reply i can think of to your "have not taste for a fight" comment, is that, isnt that what hitler thought of the British in WWII? :P
Let us hope.
However, your example is from a time when there was an extreme aversion to war on the part of national leaders and people who had experienced WWI. A repeat of Verdun, Passchendael, the Somme, etc was what people feared.
That was a very understandable practical aversion but is not the EU's current attitude toward war more of a philosophical character?
Quote
Reply
CJH
8/30/2008 12:35:07 PM
I was disregarding the EU's economic interests.
Quote
Reply
CJH
8/30/2008 1:01:01 PM
It's hard to think of pretext for this invasion. Russia dont need to annex Poland. And ABM sites can be taken out by nukes or massive air assaults (of course, those Patriots in Poland greatly increases chances that nukes will be used in case of war, instead of conventional bombers).
There's nothing more that could lead to a Russian attack on Poland.
I am sure the Kremlin has some very imaginative and creative people working for it. I can't rise to their level but I can make an attempt which at least suggests something of the kind.
Perhaps a presumably smuggled low yield nuclear device is or devices are discovered in eastern Europe/Russia. One might even be detonated somewhere. The Russians "investigate" and find some kind of connection with clandestine activity in or somehow connected to Poland. Perhaps Chechens are implicated. Perhaps the Russian or other mafia is involved. The Russians decide this is what you get with a new eastern Europe and resolve to set things right.
Quote
Reply
1
2
3
NEXT
Latest
News
Most
Read
Most
Commented
Hot
Topics
NAVAL AIR: Replacing Carriers With Cruise Missiles
WARPLANES: Rafale Fades Some More
MURPHY'S LAW: A Melancholy Milestone For MiG
MURPHY'S LAW: China Bans Military Hotrods
KURDISH WAR: The Threat From Syria And Iran
YEMEN: Death Squads Gone Wild
WEAPONS: SEALs Succumb To Sig Sauer
SUPPORT: The Chinese Air Force Underground
MORALE: The Neo-Red Army Steps Out
LIBYA: Power To The Wrong People
SUDAN: The Forever War In Darfur
AIR DEFENSE: Russian Tech Fails To Protect Syria
CHINA: Cracking Down On North Korea
MURPHY'S LAW: North Korea And The High Tech Horror
SPACE: Replacing Satellites With Software
ATTRITION: The Cost Of Good Intentions
NIGERIA: We Know Where Your Family Lives
WINNING: The North Korean Solution
SEA TRANSPORTATION: Joint High Speed Vessels
ATTRITION: Too Tough Turks Taken To Task
INDIA-PAKISTAN: Terrorists Win A big Election
INFORMATION WARFARE: All Hate All The Time
WARPLANES: Another Old Warrior Too Good To Replace
WINNING: China Counts Its Victories
AFGHANISTAN: Civilians Fighting The Taliban And Winning
MORALE: Missile Men Lose Their Mojo
THAILAND: Safe Haven Turns Into A Trap
LEADERSHIP: Following The Money For The Wrong Reasons
AIR DEFENSE: So What If It Does Not Work
SYRIA: Desperate Moves
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
Warplanes: Rafale Fades Some More
Weapons: SEALs Succumb To Sig Sauer
Support: The Chinese Air Force Underground
Murphy's Law: China Bans Military Hotrods
Air Defense: Russian Tech Fails To Protect Syria
Morale: The Neo-Red Army Steps Out
WARS Yemen: Death Squads Gone Wild
WARS China: Cracking Down On North Korea
Murphy's Law: North Korea And The High Tech Horror
WARS Libya: Power To The Wrong People
Winning: The North Korean Solution
Space: Replacing Satellites With Software
Sea Transportation: Joint High Speed Vessels
Attrition: The Cost Of Good Intentions
WARS Sudan: The Forever War In Darfur
Attrition: Too Tough Turks Taken To Task
Warplanes: Another Old Warrior Too Good To Replace
WARS India-Pakistan: Terrorists Win A big Election
Information Warfare: All Hate All The Time
WARS Nigeria: We Know Where Your Family Lives
Winning: China Counts Its Victories
Air Defense: So What If It Does Not Work
WARS Afghanistan: Civilians Fighting The Taliban And Winning
Morale: Missile Men Lose Their Mojo
WARS Syria: Desperate Moves
NAVAL AIR: Replacing Carriers With Cruise Missiles
AIR DEFENSE: Russian Tech Fails To Protect Syria
SYRIA: Desperate Moves
SEA TRANSPORTATION: Joint High Speed Vessels
WARPLANES: Rafale Fades Some More
WINNING: China Counts Its Victories
PARAMILITARY: Chinese Disaster Relief
YEMEN: Death Squads Gone Wild
INFORMATION WARFARE: All Hate All The Time
AIR DEFENSE: So What If It Does Not Work
WARPLANES: Much Delayed Apaches For South Korea
CHINA: Cracking Down On North Korea
MURPHY'S LAW: The Occupation Bonus
WINNING: The North Korean Solution
INDIA-PAKISTAN: Terrorists Win A big Election
SUPPORT: The Chinese Air Force Underground
MURPHY'S LAW: North Korea And The High Tech Horror
ATTRITION: The Cost Of Good Intentions
AFGHANISTAN: Civilians Fighting The Taliban And Winning
MORALE: Missile Men Lose Their Mojo
Dirty Little Links: News Links.
Air Defense: Russian Tech Fails To Protect Syria
Fighters, Bombers and Recon: Rafale Fades Some More
Combat Support: The Chinese Air Force Underground
On Point: Benghazi Revisited: Pinocchios for the Dead
Naval Air: Replacing Carriers With Cruise Missiles
Photo Gallery: Stennis Power
Books of Interest
The Guns at Last Light: The War in Western Europe, 1944-1945 (Liberation Trilogy)
Fallujah Awakens: Marines, Sheikhs, and the Battle Against al Qaeda (Blue and Gold)
SPECIAL OPERATIONS IN THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
Bunker Hill: A City, a Siege, a Revolution
The Way of the Knife: The CIA, a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth
From Amazon
News
How To Make War
Wars Around The World
Austin Bay's On Point
StrategyTalk
Dirty Little Secrets
Features
Al Nofi's CIC
Prediction Market
Wargames
Measure of Respect
On War and Warfare
Videos
Photos
Jokes
Community
Military Discussion Boards
Military Jokes
Military Photos
Military Book Reviews
Military Movie Reviews
StrategyPage
Subscribe
Login
Feedback
About Us
Search
Account Manager
Advertise With Us
Search