Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Submarines Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: USS Thresher: Board of Inquiry - findings
On Watch    7/11/2004 11:29:26 AM
Provided per Sentinel28 request for info about the USS Thresher casualty/loss -- OW ------------------------------------------------------------------ Navy News Service - NAVNEWS BY EMAIL - navnews@nctamslant.navy.mil ------------------------------------------------------------------ NAVY NEWS SERVICE - 26 OCT 93 - NAVNEWS 072/93 Editor's Note This Navy News Service message follows NAVNEWS 071/93, DTG 212300Z Oct 93. NAVNEWS 072/93 is being released as a means of providing more timely information to the fleet; we will release news when it is news. WASHINGTON (NNS) -- The U.S. Navy released previously classified reports Oct. 26 on the Court of Inquiry findings into the loss of the nuclear-powered submarines USS Thresher (SSN 593) in 1963... USS Thresher sank April 10, 1963, about 100 miles east of Cape Cod in 8,500 feet of water. The submarine was conducting scheduled sea trials at the time of the incident. A total of 129 men were killed (13 officers, 99 enlisted and 17 shipyard workers). The Board of Inquiry which investigated the accident found that in all probability the cause was an initial flooding casualty in the engine room, compounded by the loss of reactor power. These casualties were coupled with a less than complete "emergency blow" of the submarine's ballast tanks.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

elcid    RE:USS Thresher: Board of Inquiry - findings   7/12/2004 6:51:32 AM
You can find a useful discussion of the matter in US Submarines Since 1945 (USNI). There are also several books about it. The problem apparently involved freezing of critical lines. It was compounded by the fact that the residual energy in the boilers could not be utalized if the reactor scrammed, which it was forced to by safety protocols hard wired into the system. She was the lead ship of her class, and the class was redesigned, so all later boats are not really sisters. Submarines can now use the energy in their steam boilers even if the reactor scrams. And the cause of the freezing lines was addressed in a number of ways. There was a ship in attendence during the tests and the information about the time of the problem, and some other data, is pretty solid. Submarine accidents are uncommon but not really rare. The operating environment is pretty unforgiving, so a catistrophic failure often is fatal to the entire crew. There are more escape and rescue capabilities today, but they probably would not have saved Thresher, which was unable to maintain depth.
 
Quote    Reply

eon    RE:USS Thresher: Board of Inquiry - findings   7/22/2004 10:00:54 AM
I think it's interesting to note that since the Thresher disaaster, there has been only one fatal accident/loss of a U.S. SSN, the Scorpion in 1968. And she was a member of the Skipjack class, which predated the Thresher/Permit group. The BOI there concluded that a contributing cause of her loss was the fact that she lacked the improved safety features recommended by the Thresher BOI. The tragedy is, she was scheduled to get them at her MLUD drydocking- after the cruise on which she was lost..
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy