Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Submarines Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Conversion of USS Georgia From SSBN to SSGN
gf0012-aust    10/17/2005 8:47:13 PM
US Naval Sea Systems Command Mon, 17 Oct 2005, 08:47 The Navy today has awarded General Dynamics Electric Boat (GDEB) a cost reimbursement modification, valued at $162,359,000 for the conversion of the USS Georgia from an Ohio Class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN 729) to Ohio Class guided missile submarine (SSGN 729). ?This contract modification represents the final contractual step in transforming the first four Ohio Class SSBNs into the most capable strike and Special Forces platform in the Navy," said Capt. David Norris, who is the Program Executive Officer, Submarine?s SSGN Program Manager (PMS 398). ?USS Georgia is the last of four ships to enter the conversion phase,? Norris continued, ?and it comes almost one month to the day before Ohio returns to the Fleet as an SSGN.? The USS Georgia's conversion will be conducted concurrently with its Engineered Refueling Overhaul (ERO) work already being performed at Norfolk Naval Shipyard (NNSY). Seventy-seven percent of the ship's conversion work will also be performed at NNSY, with 16 percent of work at Quonset Point, Rhode Island and seven percent in Groton, Connecticut. USS Georgia began its ERO at NNSY in March 2005, and is expected to complete conversion in September 2007. The SSGN program leverages the expertise of private and public shipyards. General Dynamics Electric Boat (GDEB) is responsible for the ship design and conducts and manages the conversions. The Naval Shipyards are conducting the refueling overhauls, providing government furnished services to GDEB, and providing some conversion labor under Centers of Industrial and Technical Excellence agreements with GDEB. Under the direction of PMS 398, the first four Ohio Class submarines, USS Ohio (SSGN 726), USS Michigan (SSGN 727), USS Florida (SSGN 728), and USS Georgia (SSGN 729) are being converted into the new SSGN class. All four submarines in the program are in Naval Shipyards now for overhaul and conversion; specifically, Ohio and Michigan are at Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, and Florida and Georgia are at NNSY. The SSGN program oversees the development and installation of the modifications to the four Ohio Class ballistic missile submarines to provide a conventional strike capability using Tomahawk cruise missiles, as well as the SOF capability. These modifications include integration of the Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System and conversion of the existing strategic fire control system to support the launch of Tomahawk Block III and IV missiles. The missiles are housed in a modular Multiple All Up Round Canister subsystem within the submarine missile tubes. The SSGN program is producing important capability on a time-compressed schedule, at about $1 billion per ship. The cost is significantly less than the cost of a new submarine platform. The primary missions of the SSGN will be land attack and Special Operations Forces (SOF) insertion and support. Each of the converted submarines will have the capability to launch up to 154 Tomahawk or Tactical Tomahawk land attack missiles, as well as support enhanced Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance, and joint special operations. The space capacity of the SSGN provides the room needed for several SOF platoons to train and maintain physical conditioning for a sustained deployment. Clandestine insertion and retrieval of SOF operators via lockout chambers will be enhanced by the ability of the SSGN to host dual Dry Deck Shelters with SEAL Delivery Vehicles and/or the Advanced SEAL Delivery System. "With our rapid design and construction cycle, intelligent use of existing ships and support infrastructure, and unequalled land attack and special operations capabilities, the Ohio Class SSGN program is a major submarine transformation success story. SSGN provides an exceptional capability in the near term for the Global War on Terrorism at an affordable cost," said Norris.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3
gf0012-aust    New machinery - Factor X   11/10/2005 6:28:11 AM
A little birdy has told me that NG have just ordered a couple of specialised machines from Germany. Are you aware of them? They're supposed to be the largest of their type available. Sorry about the vagueness.
 
Quote    Reply

Factor X    RE:New machinery - Factor X   11/14/2005 11:18:07 PM
You got me on that one, GF. The only Big machines I'm working on is the smallest submarine in the fleet... That did or did not fall to the bottom recently... And does or does not need replacement parts... But NNS (NG) and submarines these days are like pulling teeth. EB will have put out their second Virginia before NNS gets the Texas wet. EB tells me they're lending a huge amount of personnel just to get the NNS boat out. We're getting some accoustic-ish orders from NNS, but nothing major. I guess you know something I don't. We've been doing a lot of work with the submarine fleet in Idaho, if you know what I mean. It's a 'small' submarine fleet. FX
 
Quote    Reply

Factor X    RE:New machinery - Factor X   11/14/2005 11:30:23 PM
Sheesh! Now I'm insanely curious, GF. I know a pair of ASDS's would cover several tubes, because they are like 40 or 50 or 60 or 70 or 80 feet long each. In any length, they would shroud off several tubes. If NNS get's a new "Super-secret-gigantic-machine" - it should be a "Build-Submarines-On-Time-And-On-Budget" Robot. It sounds like they need it. FX
 
Quote    Reply

683spa    RE:New machinery - Factor X   11/16/2005 9:30:29 AM
who are you asking this question too? A little birdy has told me that NG have just ordered a couple of specialised machines from Germany. Are you aware of them? They're supposed to be the largest of their type available. Sorry about the vagueness. If your asking about KDT's they are from Italy
 
Quote    Reply

AlbanyRifles    683SPA   11/23/2005 9:34:51 AM
Do you use that name because you served on the Parche? I had a buddy who was a yeoman/diver on the Parche, Mark Murphy. He ended up going Army OCS after 12 years in teh Navy and retired from the Army as a major a few years ago.
 
Quote    Reply

683spa    RE:683SPA   11/29/2005 8:43:52 AM
I was. Don't remember the name. I was on it from 82-87 and then again 90-96.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy