Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Artillery Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: RE:Howitzer versus Gun - Employment
Worcester    3/1/2004 5:18:01 PM
ISOT is right about the dimensions: <15x bore: mortar >15x bore: howitzer >25x bore: cannon The reason for these differences is the employment of these weapons. Mortar/howitzer fire >45' angle to drop shells balistically on a target. The classic indirect fire weapons. Very important if you want to drop shells into the tops of enemy positions or to penetrate top cover or, given places like Afghanistan, reach just over the crest of a hill to engage reverse slope positions. Cannons fire <45' angle and often have greater velocity and range; may be smaller shells but arrive with little warning. The traditional "grazing" fire. The relationship between barrel length and muzzle velocity is not a constant; with a certain amount of charge, there is a point beyond which the shell will no longer accelerate, no matter how long the barrel. At that point a wide bore can deliver a heavy charge with adequate accuracy. Most modern 155mm guns have a dual gun/howitzer capability. By adjusting their charge with the gun in a low elevation they can deliver short, medium and long range grazing fire; then raise the elevation to fire a high angle howitzer engagement at closer ranges. Hit the forward slopes, then hit the reverse slopes.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest




StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy