Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Artillery Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs
TheArmchairCmd    3/30/2006 10:47:43 PM
Thought this might be of interest.
http://www.sandia.gov/LabNews/060303.html target=_blank>Sandia and partners work together to build prototype electromagnetic mortar launcher for future armies By John German Sandia and a team of government and university labs are building a prototype mortar launcher that could alter the way armies have launched projectiles at their enemies for a thousand years. As part of a two-year electromagnetic mortar project for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the research team is building a prototype electromagnetic (EM) gun and demonstrating electromagnetic launch of mortar-class munitions. Full-scale field testing is scheduled for this fall at Sandia. Partners in the project include the Institute of Advanced Technology at the University of Texas; the Munitions Development Division of the US Army Armaments Research, Development, and Engineering Center; and capacitor film manufacturing company TPL, Inc. The DARPA-funded project focuses on low-cost, high-fire-rate munitions. A complementary joint Sandia project with Lockheed Martin is demonstrating EM-launched missile systems (Lab News, Jan. 21, 2005). In conventional mortar-firing operations, crews determine mortar range by the amount of propellant (the number of individually packaged propellant charges behind the round), barrel attitude, and external factors such as terrain features and wind direction. The science is essentially unchanged since 11th-century Chinese combatants used the first crude gunpowder-propelled projectiles to decimate enemy lines. Later in Europe, 15th-century armies perfected the use of cannonballs to pulverize castle walls. ?Although today?s mortar crews become very good over time, launching mortars is by today?s standards an inexact science, and it is constrained by the incremental degree of control offered by propellant rings,? says Bob Turman, Senior Manager for Directed Energy Systems Org. 5440. In an electromagnetic launcher, coils stacked along the gun?s barrel are subjected to precisely timed current pulses, one after the other, creating a magnetic wave that moves quickly up the barrel and pushes the mortar and armature along with it. No propellant is necessary, eliminating not only a safety hazard for soldiers and a logistics headache for the military, but also a major source of imprecision in conventional mortar guns. A very slight variation in propellant quality, temperature, or quantity can result in a mortar missing its target. ?There is only so much fidelity you can get with propellant rings,? says project manager Ron Kaye (5445). The barrel-end velocity of an EM-launched projectile, on the other hand, when timed by computer, can be very precisely controlled, he says. The intensity with which individual coils are fired in succession can also be adjusted on the fly to make slight adjustments, literally while the mortar is traversing the barrel. ?This will allow the warfighter to essentially dial a range,? says Ron. ?It will allow for a new degree of control.? Because no propellant loading is necessary, launch cycle times can be reduced from the 10 rounds-per-minute maximum of a skilled mortar crew to, Bob estimates, 16 to 24 rounds per minute ?determined by the time required to reload the mortar and recharge the energy-storage capacitors. Eliminating the propellant also opens the door to fully automated, robotically reloaded EM mortar guns that might achieve even faster fire rates. EM guns produce almost no muzzle flash and a fraction of the muzzle report associated with traditional artillery. In essence, the mortar departs the barrel with a swoosh rather than a bang. In today?s world of space- and aircraft-based reconnaissance sensing, reducing the optical and acoustic signal will make it more difficult for the enemy to pinpoint the source of artillery fire, says Ron. Sandia?s DARPA project focuses on land-based army munitions, and the Sandia team has built a nonfunctional replica of a turret containing an EM gun that could sit atop a Future Combat System vehicle or Bradley fighting vehicle. A full-scale, 50-coil EM gun prototype has been designed and is being built in Area 4. Projectile interaction with the EM gun barrel components have been modeled on Sandia computers and validated using data from a four-coil mock-up gun. Laboratory tests on the full-scale prototype are scheduled for this fall. For vehicle applications, a portable electrical power generation and capacitance-based storage system would be necessary, which Bob believes need be only as large and weighty as the turrets on current military platforms. DARPA is considering EM mortar launchers as a potential component of the US military?s Future Combat System. If hybrid electric vehicles are adopted, the EM launcher could, essentially, share an on-board power plant with its host vehicle, says Ron. The Sandia-led pro
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
EW3    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/30/2006 10:57:25 PM
Thanks for the post. Most people have no idea how important Sandia is to our country. They have the best and brightest down there.
 
Quote    Reply

TheArmchairCmd    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/30/2006 11:10:29 PM
I just love that they have kept their original 50's logo.
http://www.sandia.gov/images2005/logo.gif>
 
Quote    Reply

Carl S    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/30/2006 11:39:38 PM
They promised me a electromagnetic gun twentyfive years ago. Now I'm retired & wont get to play with it : (
 
Quote    Reply

EW3    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 12:04:36 AM
An intersting link from sandia (slow to load): http://www.sandia.gov/RADAR/images/SAND2005-3706P-miniSAR-flight-SAR-images.pdf Carl, this link is for you. http://www.sandia.gov/RADAR/lynx.html The Lynx is a little 150lb SAR they put on the Predator. Check out some of it's imagery. Add a laser range/direction, combined with the predators GPS, and you have the exact lat/long of an enemy.
 
Quote    Reply

TheArmchairCmd    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 12:11:23 AM
He! The SAR stuff was actually the reason why I was visiting their website. :)
 
Quote    Reply

neutralizer    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 4:35:07 AM
Some 15 years ago there was a joint US/UK demomonstrator agreement to build an EM tank gun, the test site being in Scotland. Either it was a huge success and is a serious secret or didn't work real well and is being quietely forgotten (I know my guess). EM is a bit like liquid propellant, leading research institutions regularly announce they've cracked it. Unfortunately they've usually ignored the real world of soldiers and the battlefield.
 
Quote    Reply

Carl S    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 8:12:06 AM
The earliest proposal for EM artillery I've found dated to the very ealiest 20th Century. I'll have see if there is still a source name or web link around here. The US Navy did some thinking about requirements for a ship mounted EM weapon back in the 70s or 80s. There have been periodic articals in Proceedings refering to this. Building & storing the charge seems to be one technical obstacle. Sandias effort appears to be the most recent in a century long development. that the wepon is refered to as a "mortar" suggests a few things about the technical problems.
 
Quote    Reply

reefdiver    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs - Carl S.   3/31/2006 10:10:13 AM
I assume you're implying that they're calling this a "mortar" because they its smaller or they can't get the range to call it regular artillery? I assume this will be a motorized mortar due to the power requirements. Anyone notice or specular what the power requirements for a mortar class weapon like this might be?
 
Quote    Reply

ArtyEngineer    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 12:19:45 PM
As Neutraliser says EM weapons are like Liquid Propellant systems, every so often there is a resurgence in interest, as certain technological hurdles are overcome only for others to be found. I know that Watervliet Arsenal and Benet Laboratories are working on an EM tube right now. I also know that it is a navy program, which makes sense considering the expected power requirements. I might do some rough calcs to see what type of power level is required to get a 104lb shell up to 824m/s (Current approx max MV using top charge)
 
Quote    Reply

Carl S    RE:EM Mortar - courtesy Sandia Labs   3/31/2006 1:03:50 PM
The remarks about accuracy in the publicity piece is misleading. Just from memory I can say 60%+ of the error between should hit/did hit is weather related. Propellant charge inconsistency is fairly small. (Note to self: get the firing table off the shelf) The lower the projectile mass & lower the velocity the greater effect weather has. A high trajectory does not help either.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics