The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 23, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Military Science Fiction Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Laser rifles
Miles    3/14/2007 7:19:19 PM
How would it be possible to have laser guns in the future?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6
andyf       12/6/2007 11:27:52 AM
how about a hybrid laser/taser?
an ionising laser beam makes a beam path in the air, which a fat capacitor promptly discharges down
 
i read about omething similar a while ago, and have now forgotten what they called it
 
Quote    Reply

ker       12/6/2007 6:54:44 PM

how about a hybrid laser/taser?

an ionising laser beam makes a beam path in the air, which a fat capacitor promptly discharges down

 

i read about omething similar a while ago, and have now forgotten what they called it


This would not get you the kind of safty for the target that is a big point of current tasers.  Tasers can be made small and shot, batterie and all, out to the target.  Put your taser in the nose of a micro UAV? 
 
If you wanted a more area or arc effect and were willing to increase risk of permanet injury to the targets you might find some substance that would conduct a charge and form a stream.  It might evan penetrate gaps in or the weave of what targets were wearing.  Down side is that the eletrical resistance would varrie.  You drouned out the varrieation with more juice but that increases the chance of burns or other injurie.  You could live with some people really being tased and other only being distracted if you trained for it.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       12/7/2007 2:07:06 AM

If you wanted a more area or arc effect and were willing to increase risk of permanent injury to the targets you might find some substance that would conduct a charge and form a stream.  It might even penetrate gaps in or the weave of what targets were wearing.  Down side is that the electrical resistance would varrie.  You drouned out the varrieation with more juice but that increases the chance of burns or other injurie.  You could live with some people really being tased and other only being distracted if you trained for it.

 
There are / have been numerous devices of this type proposed / created over the years.  The fluid stream is almost always salt water.

 
I do not think any has ever been a commercial success.
 
Quote    Reply

ker    Anti-parachute laser   1/8/2008 5:59:14 PM
Could a man portable laser cause a deployed parachute to collapse?  What would be the relationship between cost and weight on one hand and range and fog tolerance on the other?
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       1/10/2008 3:30:54 AM

Could a man portable laser cause a deployed parachute to collapse?  What would be the relationship between cost and weight on one hand and range and fog tolerance on the other?


If a weapon grade man portable laser can be build it should be capable of slitting a parachute and causing it to collapse.
 
But why bother?  No body deploys troops by parachute except as part of a stealthy penetration of enemy lines.  In which case, if they know you are coming you are already s-----d.
 
The other uses of parachutes are mainly for illumination flares, and the occasional supply drop.  not exactly critical targets.
 
Quote    Reply

ker       1/10/2008 4:47:57 PM




Could a man portable laser cause a deployed parachute to collapse?  What would be the relationship between cost and weight on one hand and range and fog tolerance on the other?




If a weapon grade man portable laser can be build it should be capable of slitting a parachute and causing it to collapse.

 

But why bother?  No body deploys troops by parachute except as part of a stealthy penetration of enemy lines.  In which case, if they know you are coming you are already s-----d.

 

The other uses of parachutes are mainly for illumination flares, and the occasional supply drop.  not exactly critical targets.


You make a good point.  The question came to my mind when I read that China might use paratroops against Taiwan.  I felt Taiwan would have the resources to cover the best landing zones.  Could a laser outperform in some way other options or are they just for range finding and gold plated anti-missile systems?
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       1/11/2008 12:43:50 AM

You make a good point.  The question came to my mind when I read that China might use paratroops against Taiwan.  I felt Taiwan would have the resources to cover the best landing zones.  Could a laser outperform in some way other options or are they just for range finding and gold plated anti-missile systems?

 
Drop the "gold plated".  If anything will drive the development of laser weapons it will be anti-projectile applications.
?   Boost phase anti-ballistic missile applications are first up, because, frankly, nothing else can do the job.
 
?   Anti-(small)drone, anti-mortar, anti-bombardment rocket, and anti-cruise missile.  We are already starting to seeing these systems appearing using autocannons, but they have extremely limited capability against crossing targets.  A laser will not have that problem, or a problem with collateral damages from unexploded munitions and parts of expended munitions falling to earth.
?   Development of a working anti-artillery system will reinvigorate the concept of the fortress on land and the battleship at sea. 
?   If a mobile system can be created then artillery's dominance over the battlefield will be seriously reduced, and some weapons like the NLOS missile may become rapidly obsolete.
?   The last to be deployed (if ever) will be a laser defense against direct fire projectiles.  This will only happen if the size and cost can be reduced enough to permit the system to be deployed on every armored vehicle.
These systems will not make the targets immune to fire, but will require multiple time-on-target projectiles to defeat.  This is doable for a professional army, but probably not for bandits, guerrillas, or terrorists.
 
Quote    Reply

ker       1/11/2008 2:51:25 PM
O.K. I'll drop the gold plate. 
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy