Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iraq Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: the BEST way to Deal with OBL - Public Ridicule.
swhitebull    9/9/2007 7:01:15 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IUd8kMaa-8 swhitebull - this should be broadcast all over the muslim world via Utube et al.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
doggtag    it sounds good, but...   9/9/2007 7:42:11 PM
...the repeating problem we run into is that few, if any, prominent islamic leaders have come forth to condemn all these jihadists and terrorist activities.
 
So long as the imiams and whoevers in the muslim communitites think they can sit idly by on the sidelines, acting like it's not their responsibility to help end these atrocities, this plague will continue, most likely only growing worse.
 
So much easier to gain face in the muslim world by condemning the west's satanic aggression against peaceful islam, rather than condemn your own muslim brothers who are doing your religion's dirty work.
After all, who wants to be the leader who has to tell a family its self-sacrificing children aren't martyrs, and aren't going to paradise?
 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    Is He Real? Or is He Memorex? Intersesting analysis of "The Tape"    9/10/2007 12:08:42 PM
 
 
 
swhitebull - I STILL think he's dead
 
Quote    Reply

PlatypusMaximus       9/10/2007 1:52:58 PM
MOAB:
.(4) The effect of blast weapons is also compounded in buildings and other enclosed spaces, and is twelve to sixteen times more destructive than conventional high explosives against targets with large surface areas, such as frame buildings, bunkers, and vehicle shelters.(5 According to a 1993 study by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency: The [blast] kill mechanism against living targets is unique--and unpleasant.... What kills is the pressure wave, and more importantly, the subsequent rarefaction [vacuum], which ruptures the lungs.… If the fuel deflagrates but does not detonate, victims will be severely burned and will probably also inhale the burning fuel. Since the most common FAE fuels, ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, are highly toxic, undetonated FAE should prove as lethal to personnel caught within the cloud as most chemical agents.(8) According to a separate U.S. Central Intelligence Agency study, "the effect of an FAE explosion within confined spaces is immense. Those near the ignition point are obliterated.....
 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    Memorex   9/13/2007 11:59:30 AM

link
 

 

 

swhitebull - I STILL think he's dead



From LittleGreenFootballs:

Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 5:43:02 pm PDT

A digital image forensics expert says what a lot of us have already been thinking: Researcher: Bin Laden’s beard is real, video is not.

On the Friday before the sixth anniversary of 9/11, Osama bin Laden appeared in a new video, his first since prior to the U.S. presidential elections in 2004. In analyzing the video, Neal Krawetz of Hactor Factor, an expert on digital image forensics, said in his latest blogs that the video contained many visual and audio splices, and that all of the modifications were of very low quality.

Most striking is bin Laden’s beard, which has been gray in recent images. For this video it is black. “As far as my tools can detect, there has been no image manipulation of the bin Laden portion of the image beyond contrast adjustment. His beard really does appear to be that color.” The Washington Post has the full video here.

Krawetz says the inner frame of bin Laden was resaved at least twice, and not at the same time. The images show fine horizontal stripes on bin Laden and a background indicating these came from interlaced video sources. In contrast, the text elements, such as the As-Sahab logo, appear to be from non-interlaced sources.

The September 7 video shows bin Laden dressed in a white hat, white shirt and yellow sweater. Krawetz notes “this is the same clothing he wore in the 2004-10-29 video. In 2004 he had it unzipped, but in 2007 he zipped up the bottom half. Besides the clothing, it appears to be the same background, same lighting, and same desk. Even the camera angle is almost identical.” Krawetz also notes that “if you overlay the 2007 video with the 2004 video, his face has not changed in three years—only his beard is darker and the contrast on the picture has been adjusted.”

More important though are the edits. At roughly a minute and a half into the video there is a splice; bin Laden shifts from looking at the camera to looking down in less than 1/25th of a second. At 13:13 there is a second, less obvious splice. In all, Krawetz says there are at least six splices in the video. Of these, there are only two live bin Laden segments, the rest of the video composed of still images. The first live section opens the video and ends at 1:56. The second section begins at 12:29 and continues until 14:01. The two live sections appear to be from different recordings “because the desk is closer to the camera in the second section.”

Allahpundit pointed out some of the same edits a few days ago.
 
 
swhitebull
 
Quote    Reply

Ashley-the-man       9/15/2007 9:16:17 AM
 

swhitebull - I STILL think he's dead

 

 

Similar to the Patton clip we saw a few days ago.

 

Alive, bin Laden would have much to fear from a reporter claiming to want an interview.  He fears the Massoud treatment that the Northern Alliance received when a camera blew up and killed him a day before 911.

 

The CIA eliminated the bin Laden unit a few years ago and Bush never speaks about him as he no longer speaks of Saddam.  It is important for al Qaeda to maintain an illusion of a living breathing bin Laden as it is with the Democrat party that can narrowly focus on one boggy man and ignore many others.

 

It is likely that the words were scripted by an American Muslim convert who is more up to date on western culture than would be bin Laden hiding out in some cave. 

 

I doubt bin Laden’s ego would allow him to read verbatim from a speech writer without his usual take.

 

The latest “Weekend at Bernie’s” update raises more questions than it answers.

 

One being why is the CIA so quick to proclaim this low level CGI as being a living bin Laden? Inquiring minds want to know.

 

 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    Dead Man Talking    9/17/2007 6:23:57 PM

No, I have no idea how they did it, but they did it damned well.

http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0 height=370 width=450 classid=clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000> http://www.youtube.com/v/rUiNiB2yVCQ" quality="high" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="450" height="370">
 
 
swhitebull
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics