Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iraq Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Where for art tho Lancet threads?
EW3    10/14/2006 6:52:31 PM
Is SP getting hacked. We've had 1 thread lock up so it can't be posted to. And the two replacement threads hacked. Seems like right after sheck makes cogent points about the fallacy of the report, the thread he does it on disappears.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Pseudonym       11/14/2007 7:41:54 AM
 American UN Weapons Inspectors commented on the insane amount of dual use "pesticides" stored at Iraqi ammunition depots.  Dual use pesticides at an ammunition depot.  Let's think about possible uses and an Administration that freaked out over mobile Chemical Weapons Labs.  I wonder why....

Anyways, as Sgt. Obvious implies, there was plenty of WMD for Saddam to scare his intended target.

His own people.  Shia and Kurd alike.

Some day the world might understand that we are not fighting Al Qaeda, but the underlying culture which spawned Yousef, KSM, etc...
 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    Damning Report and Analysis of the Lancet Survey   1/4/2008 10:57:14 AM
from national review:
 

Damning Report on the Lancet's Iraq Survey   [Michael Rubin]

Last year, the British medical journal Lancet published a bombshell report suggesting that more than 600,000 Iraqi civilians had died as a result of Operation Iraqi Freedom and its aftermath.  Neil Munro has conducted an in-depth investigation into the survey and has a great piece out in the National Journal:  Neil summarizes:

George Soros funded the survey. The U.S. authors played no role in data-collection, and did not apply standard anti-fraud measures. The chief Iraqi data-collector had earlier produced medical articles to help Saddam?s anti-sanctions campaign in the 1990s, and said Allah guided the prior 2004 Lancet/Johns Hopkins death-survey. Some of the field surveyors were employed by Moqtada Sadr?s Ministry of Health. The Iraqis? numbers contain evidence of fakery, and the Lancet did not check for fakery.

The whole article is here....
 
swhitebull - beating a dead horse, but hey, we strive for completeness, unlike Lancet. I just LOVE the Soros connection; it REALLY increases the credibility of the study.
 
 
 
 
 
Quote    Reply

PlatypusMaximus       1/6/2008 3:21:01 PM
The new spin from the Moveovers, in this case Moveunders, is to quietly accept the IBC numbers, which they ridiculed, but use those numbers to continue to blame every documented civilian and police death in Iraq on the US military.
(IBC mentions that their numbers include civilian deaths caused by US forces.)

"US-LED coalition and paramilitary forces in Iraq were responsible for some 24,000 violent civilian deaths in 2007, according to an independent group monitoring casualties in the war-ravaged country".
http://www.news.com.au/story/0...

Scumbags.

 
Quote    Reply

swhitebull    LONG Time - BUt Final Lancet Nailed Driven In    2/5/2009 9:24:45 PM
 
 
swhitebull -  you wait long enough, the truth wills out.
 
Quote    Reply

Panther       3/4/2009 10:52:30 AM
I think the credibility of the study was always suspect and subservient to politics. Soros got the results he wanted. Obama is now in office and how many times have they needed too revise the numbers?
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy