Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iraq Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Where for art tho Lancet threads?
EW3    10/14/2006 6:52:31 PM
Is SP getting hacked. We've had 1 thread lock up so it can't be posted to. And the two replacement threads hacked. Seems like right after sheck makes cogent points about the fallacy of the report, the thread he does it on disappears.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21   NEXT
DarthAmerica       11/9/2006 5:35:45 PM








Oh yeah I forgot to add:





150,000 dead/ by 1,300 days since invasion= 115 dead per day.




424 dead per day in US Civil War

28000 dead per day in WW II

603 dead per day in Operation Desert Storm

400-500 dead per day in Sudan since 2003


Hey look at that I can count too! Wow everybody brace yourself for breaking news. People actually get killed in Wars! Would you believe that? No it cant be. Thank Plutarch for helping to bring this to light. Let us know when you want to discuss the relevant points of this war. Especially with regard to how it affects American security.

DA



Wow the unashamed equivocating begins in earnest.  I can go back and find all the old posts that state that Iraq is not in a state of civil war, it is not unstable, blah, blah, blah, some even posted by you DA.  NOW you want to talk about the relevant points of the war?  Okay how about how do we stop the violence that is killing 115 Iraqis (at a minimum) per day?  Oh wait that's sectarian violence that has nothing to do with the US and the GWOT, we are only focused on AQI...but according to you we beat AQI, so why can't we just leave now?
 


Oh wait that's right we have to do something about the violence in Iraq; and around and around we go.

When you get from behind your bias and listen to warriors about wars rather than left wing news and blogs this will start to make sense to you. Until then I guess you are Lima-Lima-Mike-Foxtrot!
 
Quote    Reply

Plutarch       11/9/2006 5:54:06 PM
















Oh yeah I forgot to add:








150,000 dead/ by 1,300 days since invasion= 115 dead per day.






424 dead per day in US Civil War

28000 dead per day in WW II

603 dead per day in Operation Desert Storm

400-500 dead per day in Sudan since 2003


Hey look at that I can count too! Wow everybody brace yourself for breaking news. People actually get killed in Wars! Would you believe that? No it cant be. Thank Plutarch for helping to bring this to light. Let us know when you want to discuss the relevant points of this war. Especially with regard to how it affects American security.

DA







Wow the unashamed equivocating begins in earnest.  I can go back and find all the old posts that state that Iraq is not in a state of civil war, it is not unstable, blah, blah, blah, some even posted by you DA.  NOW you want to talk about the relevant points of the war?  Okay how about how do we stop the violence that is killing 115 Iraqis (at a minimum) per day?  Oh wait that's sectarian violence that has nothing to do with the US and the GWOT, we are only focused on AQI...but according to you we beat AQI, so why can't we just leave now?
 




Oh wait that's right we have to do something about the violence in Iraq; and around and around we go.



When you get from behind your bias and listen to warriors about wars rather than left wing news and blogs this will start to make sense to you. Until then I guess you are Lima-Lima-Mike-Foxtrot!

Lost Like a Motley Fool---when you get your officer's commission let me know...no wait I'll be able to tell since your spelling and grammar will improve.
 
Quote    Reply

Pseudonym       11/9/2006 7:00:16 PM
"Lost Like a Motley Fool---when you get your officer's commission let me know...no wait I'll be able to tell since your spelling and grammar will improve."

How are you today you John Kerry wannabe.

Let me guess, this statement is a botched joke and you didn't just call our soldiers stupid?

Enjoy being ignored, you just got put on the John Kerry hit the mute button list.

God pricks like this make me wish I could swear on here.

 
Quote    Reply

Plutarch       11/9/2006 7:11:03 PM

"Lost Like a Motley
Fool---when you get your officer's commission let me know...no wait
I'll be able to tell since your spelling and grammar will improve."



How are you today you John Kerry wannabe.



Let me guess, this statement is a botched joke and you didn't just call our soldiers stupid?



Enjoy being ignored, you just got put on the John Kerry hit the mute button list.



God pricks like this make me wish I could swear on here.



No it's just me getting tired of DA's bombastic attitude and arrogance, it gets to the point of serious derangement.  On the other hand Shek, a fine soldier, West Point grad, and instructor is verbose and knowledgeable on many subjects, and someone I have great respect for; DA could learn a lot from him.

 
It doesn't hurt my feelings for you to ignore me, and I'd rather be ignored than insulted.
 
Quote    Reply

shek       11/9/2006 7:41:27 PM

When you get from behind your bias and listen to warriors about wars rather than left wing news and blogs this will start to make sense to you. Until then I guess you are Lima-Lima-Mike-Foxtrot!
Darth,

Plutarch's points about the civilian deaths in Iraq are tremendously important and appropriate, at least according to the CENTCOM commander, General Abizaid.  His #1 concern is the sectarian violence in Iraq, and in fact, MG Caldwell published an oped on the subject of sectarian violence today, demonstrating how important the top leadership in Iraq feels about the sectarian violence.  The fact that the level of sectarian violence is on an upward trendline is not comforting news for the stated goals in Iraq - a secure and stable democracy that is an ally in the GWOT.  If you disagree with his numbers that were presented earlier in the thread, you can look here:
 
link
 
These numbers were provided by the Iraqi government, and hardly a conspiracy by the left wing. 

Lastly, please do not try to invoke that service automatically makes one right when discussing Iraq.  If that were so, then the coercive tactics and collective responsibility tactics that were pursued in part under General Sanchez would have been effective.  However, the insurgency grew, demonstrating that being in the military does not make one right. 

Cheers.
 
Quote    Reply

Pseudonym       11/9/2006 7:41:38 PM
"No it's just me getting tired of DA's bombastic attitude and arrogance, it gets to the point of serious derangement.  On the other hand Shek, a fine soldier, West Point grad, and instructor is verbose and knowledgeable on many subjects, and someone I have great respect for; DA could learn a lot from him."

This is your response to insulting the ENLISTED RANKS, to say you respect OFFICERS.

I think every enlisted soldier in the United States Army would prefer to be ignored instead of insulted.

Have fun at your next Kerry Composium.

 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    Shek Reply   11/9/2006 11:19:21 PM
Shek

I disagree not only with Plutarch, but with you as well. Especially your assertion that heavy handed tactics are counter productive. Plutarch's numbers aren't being presented in the context of measuring progress in stopping sectarian violence either. Properly implemented  heavy handed down right brutal ruthless use of force is the only thing thats going to save Iraqis from themselves. Its the only thing they understand. When you are in a war, you must not only break the Army, but you must also break its will to fight. These tactics aren't new or particularly creative on my part. In fact they are timeless principles of war that apparently some of us have forgotten. How the heck did Saddam and his Army manage to control the sectarian divide? The solution is right in front of you! Stop over thinking the problem. Heck Iraq is lucky I'm not the CG in the short term because if I was 115 dead a day would seem like picnic. In the long term though Iraq would definitely prosper as most of our prior enemies have AFTER WE BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF THEM.

Hey buy guess what? Its ok. Keep theorizing, criticizing and advocating pulling punches. The end result will speak for itself and people will be wishing for the rebirth of  the likes of General Le May to settle this issue. But Shek, thats my 2 cents based on my world view. We live in a Democracy so I'm sure you will express your disagreement both here and at the polls. I'm fine with that. At the end though one of us will be proven right. Also, whether or not you agree, I don't use my military experience as a substitute for logical reasoned analysis of military matters.



DA
 
Quote    Reply

Pseudonym       11/9/2006 11:37:06 PM
I'm still waiting to hear of the PC attack plan that would have quelled the hatred that has been brewing in Iraq for a long long time.

Fact is Iraq is and always was a long term war.  Build up the Iraqi's and let them fight it, that's the plan.  Fix mistakes as they happen, but to expect perfection is ludicrous. Go tell those slaughtered by Saddam that they cannot have their revenge, see how far you get.  Come up with a bribery plan, and watch them take the bribe and do it anyway.  Nothing was going to stop the incessant slaughter, if we hadn't gone it would still be Saddam slaughtering everyone else.  We are there to bring effective government to the country that will eventually turn this war into a police action, taking decades if not centuries to quell the unrest.  

We could stay there for a decade with a million troops, effective leadership, and massive success, never solving a single solitary problem.  Only the Iraqi's can win this war, we are the outsiders.

This is and always was an Iraqi fight, we cannot stop the slaughter short of sending in millions of troops and putting boots on every corner, and leaving them there indefinitely.  We are the referee's on their march toward effective government.  We show them the rules and keep them playing as fair as possible, penalizing them when necessary.
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       11/10/2006 2:41:10 AM

I'm still waiting to hear of the PC attack plan that would have quelled
the hatred that has been brewing in Iraq for a long long time.



Fact is Iraq is and always was a long term war.  Build up the
Iraqi's and let them fight it, that's the plan.  Fix mistakes as
they happen, but to expect perfection is ludicrous. Go tell those
slaughtered by Saddam that they cannot have their revenge, see how far
you get.  Come up with a bribery plan, and watch them take the
bribe and do it anyway.  Nothing was going to stop the incessant
slaughter, if we hadn't gone it would still be Saddam slaughtering
everyone else.  We are there to bring effective government to the
country that will eventually turn this war into a police action, taking
decades if not centuries to quell the unrest.  



We could stay there for a decade with a million troops, effective
leadership, and massive success, never solving a single solitary
problem.  Only the Iraqi's can win this war, we are the outsiders.



This is and always was an Iraqi fight, we cannot stop the slaughter
short of sending in millions of troops and putting boots on every
corner, and leaving them there indefinitely.  We are the referee's
on their march toward effective government.  We show them the
rules and keep them playing as fair as possible, penalizing them when
necessary.
Well Said

 
Quote    Reply

EW3       11/10/2006 2:53:41 AM
Picked this up from LGFooseballs...
 
Murtha: "The President Has No Power"

A triumphant Rep. John Murtha describes what will happen if he’s elected Majority Leader, to a sympathetic interviewer at NPR: Murtha to Run for Majority Lea.... (Hat tip: John.)

Regarding Iraq:

Winning is not a strategy, victory is not a strategy.

What the Dems will do:

We’re gonna say, here’s a plan that we have, and Speaker Pelosi has signed on to the plan I have, stability in the Middle East, stability in Iraq comes from redeployment of our troops, and that’s gonna be what we’ll work for.

On the Presidency:

Listen, this is not a dictatorship. The President can say all he wants to. The President has, has no power. The President is a, a perception of power. And he’s lost that power in this election.

 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy