Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Iraq Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: How many of the torture pictures are fake?
Blackwood    4/30/2004 9:27:14 PM
There's questions about the alleged torture pictures being passed around on the internet. The BOTTOM set of photos on the arab site link that are not from link are obviously from a porn film and not legit Their uniform is nothing at all like the Iraqi issue. They're wearing jungle fatigues in a desert. The tire props are cheap and look like from a Honda, not a Hummer They have no indentifying insiginia of any army at all. Some clothing is too large and ill fitting. (One guy's shirt reaches down to his knees in the third from the bottom photo, which was laughed at by a veteran looking over my soldier here.) Their shoes are cheap and not military issue. The women gang raped appear to be hispanic and russian, not iraqi. But the photos on: link are harder to dismiss. The guy in a hospital gown standing on a box does NOT have wires connected to his testicles, despite the earlier verbal reports. The man "beaten to death" leaves the question, "beaten by whom"? He's certainly not in a US Army body bag, but appears to be wrapped in saran wrap from some arab deli. He may be a shopkeeper beaten to death by a gang. It definately is out of sequence with the rest of the series. The series with the woman and hooded naked men appears to be legit, the uniform fatigues correct. But is it a training exercise with American GIs playign Iraqis that later fell into goofing off for the camera? One man has "Rapeist" written across his buttock. He later appears stacked in a naked pyramid with this same word displayed. He may or may not also be the one miming forced oral sex to another man with a bag also still on his head. While the guy with glasses has rubber gloves for body excavation, the girl who this exercise seems to be about does not. Her role mostly seems to be not laugh outloud at her crew appearing in the buff. The men pose for the camera and strut their stuff while keeping hooded anonymnousness. Most importantly, all the men are in a jail cell, outnumbering the army staff 8-2, hooded, but with unobstructed hand usage. You can even see one taking off his hood in boredom in the lower right picture, carefully obscurred by a body in the front. Wouldn't prisoners undergoing a body cavity search usually be in handcuffs, at least until any concealled weapons were cleared? There unfortunately are no tattoos visible in the pictures released. which would be a sure sign of GIs, not Iraqis. There do appear to be bikini tan lines, but that may be a trick of the pixillation. The prisoners do seem to be much more well fed and exercised than you'd expect of someone who's been in prison for a long time. And they're into American frat boy stunts like stacking in a pyramid for the camera. Arab culture also has a severe taboo about exposing the soles of one's feet that seems to be disregarded here. Currently, I can't conclusively rule out the link photos as a training exercise, but I can say it's possible.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   NEXT
azure    RE:A few idiots. -- A.K.   5/3/2004 10:33:29 PM
I find this tendency towards collectivist thinking - extending the analysis of a sordid event to a broad-brush portrayal of it as representative of the actions of the entire group... - ...is cartoonish in scope and offensive in reality. Followed the Palestinian-Israeli conflict lately? I'm happy you recognize that collectivist thinking (and collective punishment, etc.) is wrong. I think the problem with what has been revealed in Iraq is the sense that these happenings are not isolated. You know what? We'll never know. I do give the average Iraqi credit, and I'm sure not all of feel that there is a real risk that any U.S. officer could urinate on them at any given time... But this is a nightmare scenario. The USA is now a laughingstock, and we really must question how this whole invasion has played out and why. Would you not agree that such an incident is precisely the opposite of what will help restore law and order in this country? And would you also not agree that every bit of fault lies with the USA? They're the ones who can't control their bladders. (You know what I mean.) If building credibility is such an important factor, how could this happen? Please, you cannot speak of the average Iraqi and their feelings about America and American occupation without coming to terms with what is happening right now: soldiers are being attack every day, from every angle, by everyone. The sheer ferocity and frequency of violence does not correlate to the actions of a few insurgents. The USA is universally despised in Iraq - what are they doing there? The whole war on terrorism thing has lost focus to the point where the US is jeopardizing its security by playing conquer the oil-rich-nations game. To speak about instilling democracy, etc., is just insulting to the intelligence of anyone smart enough to question this false campaign.
 
Quote    Reply

NewGuy    RE:A few idiots. -- A.K.   5/3/2004 11:02:06 PM
"soldiers are being attack every day, from every angle, by everyone. The sheer ferocity and frequency of violence does not correlate to the actions of a few insurgents." Bald-faced lies on your part, Azure. Lets see you back up these statements with facts: a) Prove to us how "everyone" in Iraq is attacking American soldiers. If that were true, then a hundred, or even hundreds, of US soldiers would be killed every single day. Its a lie, or gross exaggeration at best, and you know it. b) "USA is universally despised in Iraq" -- show me -any- poll that shows that the US is 'universally despised' in Iraq as you stated. Yet another lie and/or gross claim on your part. c) "The sheer ferocity and frequency of violence does not correlate to the actions of a few insurgents." Do you have any evidence -at all- to back up this absurd picture you are trying to paint: Namely that US soldiers are being attacked over every inch of Iraq, by every one in Iraq no matter who they are or who they side with, every minute of the day. The facts of the situation say you are a liar. Prove me wrong. NewGuy
 
Quote    Reply

sentinel28a    RE:A few idiots. -- A.K.   5/3/2004 11:49:43 PM
That's the problem with generalizations. They don't work. That's like me saying that all Palestinians are bad, all Iraqis are insurgents, and everything reported by CNN is wrong. Azure, if you truly believe that raping and killing is something practiced by the US Army on a daily basis, then I can't help you. You've got your mind made up, and facts aren't going to make a difference or not. These were not atrocities. It was plain abuse and stupidity, but not an atrocity. My Lai was an atrocity. Sand Creek was an atrocity. 80,000 dead Kurds from Saddam's nonexistent WMDs back in 1988 was an atrocity. Maybe it's hard for you to realize this, but people in the Army--in most armies, actually--are human beings. There's not some required course in basic training where you come out of it a slavering monster. Most soldiers are horrified by real atrocities, and disgusted when something like this happens. It's when they turn a blind eye to it and shrug that you get problems--i.e. the Wehrmacht in WWII. That didn't happen here--the soldiers that are responsible were turned in by other soldiers. The same happened at My Lai. Medina and Calley were exposed by other soldiers who had seen what had happened, and prosecuted under Army law. Calley got life in prison (he should have been shot); it was Nixon that commuted it and set him free, in one of Tricky Dick's less smart moments. 265 other Americans were also prosecuted for war crimes in Vietnam (out of a total deployed force of over a million men). I've yet to see war crimes trials being done by the NVA, who were responsible for 2500 people killed in Hue City *alone*, in two weeks of Feburary 1968. Public relations wise, this is a disaster, and we'll be a long time living it down. Mainly because the media will keep playing it for the next few weeks--after all, last month was Tet 2.0, so naturally we have to have a My Lai 2.0 to follow it, even though no prisoners are known to have died. It doesn't make what happened any better, and personally I think these men should be publicly flogged in downtown Baghdad. The Iraqis would understand that and accept it. Of course, the media would be horrified. Again, damned if you do. Methinks you have a personal beef with the US Army, Azure, and this merely confirms your opinion that anyone in the military is an idiot whose sole purpose in life is to rape, pillage, and kill. Offhand, I'd mark you as a freshman at a liberal college, possibly my own, but I realize I may be misjudging you.
 
Quote    Reply

wingedhorses    azure--if the situation was reversed   5/4/2004 9:49:07 AM
" what would have happened had this situation been reversed? At the beginning of this invasion, for instance, when Iraq did take American prisoners? America would have gone INSANE. I mean, come on, urinating on a prisoner?" excuse me, azure, the situation already has been reversed and we (americans, government, military, general public) have been tested and did not take out our wrath in irrational or bestial ways: Private Jessica Lynch was anally raped and beaten so badly that she required sugery on her spine and now uses a collastomy bag!!!! We don't know what happened to the other female private before she died...but if it was anything like Pvt. Lynch's experience...
 
Quote    Reply

wingedhorses    leoninnyc--perception trumps reality   5/4/2004 10:00:13 AM
Well in the end it doesn't trump reality, leon. Reality is reality; if you're dead, you're dead. The Twin Towers are just **not there** anymore. I can look out my window and see the hole in the sky. But my point is we can't run our foreign policy--or any freaking policy--around what Al-freaking Jazeera "think" or broadcasts. Guess what!! If we don't do it--whatever it is--they'll say we will and run some artfully-altered tape to prove it. Ever heard that the Israelis caused 9/11? Or that Monica Levinsky was a MOssad agent? Or how about this, that the US never landed on the moon (it was a skillful hoax created in Hollywood)?? Well, these are all common conspiracy theories in the Arab world. No amount of reason will dissuade the holders of these beliefs; they are determined to believe what they believe. The PMC--the state-owned and operated tv station of the Palestinian Authority regularly auguments, digitally-alters and generally messes around with legit news report video to make the points it wants to make. Trying to please the Arab world is a losers game. There is a botttomless pit of greivance, of shame, and of self-loathing there that we as a country can't medicate and can't assuage. Only real societal reform will end the greivance parade on Al-Jazeera.
 
Quote    Reply

Andrea    RE:Once again Azure shows his bias.   5/5/2004 1:26:15 AM
What "horrible atrocities"? These pictures show abuse of power on part of the US soldiers involved, and humiliation of the prisoners involved to be sure, but exactly where are the "horrible atrocities" you speak of? If this is "horrible atrocities", exactly how do you define what bloody Saddam did to his prisoners? Hike down your skirt azure, you bias is showing. NewGuy """Wel New guy, the US military has admitted to 25 deaths in US custody. To me that's an atrocity, because you got to take care for POW's. instead of beating them to death, which makes no difference to what sadam did, plain and simple""""
 
Quote    Reply

wingedhorses    RE:andrea, Once again Azure shows his bias.   5/5/2004 11:55:37 AM
Good grief Andrea, You've got to learn to think a little more critically than that: "The US has **admitted** to 25 deaths in custody"...BIG DEAL. Yes, they know and are "admitting" ("reporting" would be a better description) that, among the hundreds of people in custody 25 died. Why do you assume they were beaten to death??? Brain, darling. Try using your brain for about five minutes. Prisoners arrive in all kinds of condition--especially in a third-world-ish place like Iraq. Some are sick, some are old, some kill each other in custody, some kill themselves, some attack guards and are killed by the guards in self-defense... Yeeesh...Andrea, are you a high school grad? a college grad? Or are you an example of what the US schools are turning out these days?
 
Quote    Reply

SC29112    RE:A few idiots.   5/5/2004 2:44:19 PM
Will Rumsfeld get the axe because of this? Lithmus test for the Bush cheerleading squad to step up to the plate and take a swing at this one.
 
Quote    Reply

SGTObvious    RE:A few idiots.   5/5/2004 2:58:25 PM
"Will Rumsfeld get the axe because of this?" Why? Is he personally accountable for every action by everyone under his command? Did you lobby to have Clinton impeached after the rapes in Okinawa, or is this only an issue when its a politician you don't like? Personally, I don't like the guy. Too much love for the tech, too little understanding of human nature, or the realities of blood and steel. But if we were to adopt a policy of sacrificing a leader for a wrongdoing far below him, doesn't that make future leaders very vulnerable to "kamikaze career busters"- subordinates who will deliberately do something monumentally wrong, just to take down the people on top? (I've seen it happen). Would future leaders knowing that policy is to "give them the axe" for crimes by subordinates, be more or less likely to cover up future crimes? Think.
 
Quote    Reply

SGTObvious    RE:Once again Azure shows his bias.   5/5/2004 3:02:11 PM
"""Wel New guy, the US military has admitted to 25 deaths in US custody."" How many due to pre-existing medical conditions or complications? Violent escape or assault attempts? How many POWs were gravely injured when captured? Is the correct policy, when finding a mortally wounded enemy soldier "take him inot custody and do your best" or "don't take him into custody, one less death on our hands"? Do you know, or just showing your bias??
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy