The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - July 4, 2009



Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: US Strategic Moves Analysis - Not Media Paranoia
Galrahn    12/28/2006 11:07:48 PM

I don't buy the whole 'Iranian Strike Theory' promoted in Naval buildup media reports like the one Herc is hyping, but I do think it is more than noteworthy to discuss the strategic moves the US is doing in the Middle East, at least in evaluation from a strategic perspective when there is a new strategy being discussed regarding the 2 ongoing wars in the region.

I like to look at things from a Naval perspective, but would be very grateful if someone familiar with US/UK/NATO troop rotations in Iraq and Afghanistan could add additional Army or Air Force analysis.

If we ignore the media paranoia regarding the typical CSG and ESG in the Persian Gulf, and remember the Stennis CSG and Bataan ESG have been preparing for several months to make their scheduled deployments in January 07, and look at what else is happening, there are some noteworthy events.

First, over the past few weeks 70 F-16s from the 122nd Fighter Wing and 1 twelve plane squadron of the 388th Fighter Wing have deployed to the Middle East. The 122nd is an Air National Guard unit, only sent for a few months to provide immediate air support based on requirements on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq, presumably until Naval air power is able to be surged. No matter how you look at it though, the decision to deploy 80 F-16s, and more importantly their infrastructures, to Southeast Asia is a major move.

Second, the number of naval warships in the region has increased, not only by the US but by allies as well. The Boxer ESG and the Eisenhower CSG may get all the headlines, and the USS Ashland may grab a little attention by replacing the USS Saipan off the Horn of Africa, but what about the naval buildup? HMS Blyth and HMS Ramsay are now on station. USS Gladiator was loaded onto Condock 5 and shipped to the region, and another Condock ship has been chartered to move a yet unnamed Ingleside MCM to Bahrain. These 2 minesweepers are an upgrade over the two retiring coastal minesweepers the US has sold to Egypt.

A very interesting but barely reported item took place back in November when the USS Underwood (which is otherwise working up off the east coast with the Bataan ESG), crossed the pond to integrated itself with SNMG2. At that time, the USS Monterey, which had just been appointed flagship of SNMG2 in October, was replaced by the new flagship HS Bouboulina. The Monterey remains in SNMG2 though (for now). On the flip side, USS Boone is in Rota for repairs after losing all electrical power early in December, a Spanish Fleet tug had to tow it to port, meaning SNMG1 is down a US frigate at the same time the CENTCOM is calling for more forces.

There were two ships that did cross the Suez that should have raised eyebrows. USNS Shughart and USNS Soderman both crossed the Suez heading for the Gulf earlier this month.

More notes worthy of comment. The JMSDF DDG Makinami is the escort for Task Force 53, the US Navy logistics task force in the Middle East. There is a rumor Destroyer Squadron 50 will be activated and deployed from the East Coast in January. DESRON 50 would be a 5th Fleet surface action group formed on an 'as needed' basis. Additionally, the Navy has gone out of its way to publicize 5 SSNs in the Middle East region including USS Dallas, USS Newport News, USS Greenville, USS Providence, and USS Minneapolis St. Paul. Can someone, anyone explain the wisdom of announcing the presence of 5 SSNs in one fleet region?

There are 2 Canadian, 1 British, 1 German, 1 Pakistani, 4 French (including the Jeanne D' Arc), and 1 additional US warships (USS Taylor) in the southeast Asian region over the next few months.

Things to ponder. Unless the Stennis CSG cancels expected exercises with allies, which I doubt, it will not reach the Gulf until close to March, which is about the time the Eisenhower CSG is expected to come home. If there is an aircraft carrier surge, it will either be the Reagan in the Pacific or the Enterprise in the Atlantic. The Roosevelt is expected to go into DPIA after the Washington comes out., the Lincoln is in DPIA, the Nimitz could deploy, but is already expected to deploy in the spring of 07 as is the Truman, which is expected to have a RN escort. With the Vinson in refueling it only leaves the Kitty Hawk, which unlikely to leave Japan, and the JFK which retires next year.

The ESGs set for early 07 deployments are the Bataan ESG followed a few months later by the Kearsarge and Bohommee Richard ESGs.If there is a surge, look for one of the LHAs to be sent, although I wouldn't bet against the Wasp being sent with MV-22s in an attempt to get the MV-22s into action early in 07.

Like I said, while I don't buy the Iranian Strike Theory, I do buy the Navy on your front lawn theory, and expect it to be in motion in January with a March target timeframe. The 4 fleet minesweepers (2 RN and 2 USN) is a new look, and would normally be a sign of trouble with Iran, but I don?t buy it as offensive, but rather defensive. Look for many panic media reports of war looming, and plenty of typical Herc reactionary commentary early in the new year.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Nanheyangrouchuan       12/28/2006 11:49:02 PM
All this could be in support of a major pounding on the Iraqi insurgency around the time Saddam is hung and the pending US troop surge. 
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    Saddam will be hung quickly to give the insurgents minimum time to plan.   12/29/2006 12:57:09 AM

All this could be in support of a major pounding on the Iraqi insurgency around the time Saddam is hung and the pending US troop surge. 

As for the Navy moves, I agree with the previous analysis. This is a hedge against  trouble and does not presage or signal any intent to attack.

Herald
 
Quote    Reply

Francois       12/29/2006 3:26:16 AM
Gal, note that the CdG and its group is to deploy to the Gulf and support OEF starting in jan '07 for several months.
More again, we are planning to send a number of Rafales to Duchambe also.
The Jeanne d'Arc is only on yearly training tour, I don't think we should count her and her escort into the OOB.
Sofar, Euromarfor is almost naked (no major warships) in the North of the Indian Ocean since the departure of the Brits, the Italians, the Germans (except Brandenburg) and the French, mainly because of quasi-uninterrupted two years of presence.
 
But that will change drastically by Feb '07. Then we might have not less then 3 CSGs and 2 or 3 ESGs in the area.
Poms have an excercice planned also at that time, IIRC.
 
Quote    Reply

Herc the Merc    Galrahn-Iran must be humbled on OUR terms   12/29/2006 2:15:54 PM
U r critically mistaken if u think we can continue to be Muscleman #1 in the world and have Iran dictate events in Iraq and
build a nuke. Sure it is gunboat diplomacy or some contingency, but if we cannot twist Irans arm on any point ie Iraq or its nuke program or its support and arming of Hezbullah--lets just cut defence budget by 50% and stop Iraq NOW. Thats a chunk of change for other things--we no longer need such a military. And if Iran succeeds nobody in the Sunni world like Saudi will ever count on us-they will make their own nukes-Israel will laff at us. U see Iran has to be humbled--something may happen--u just can't let Iran win and remain a Superpower. Image is everything.
 
Quote    Reply

Galrahn       12/29/2006 2:30:09 PM
Do you have a list of escorts for the CdG? My lists for CdG and Illustrious groups at this point are partial.

One of the most interesting things taking place in the USN Atlantic Fleet and NATO is the level of cooperation and integration.

In 2007, the USS Barry will be integrated into the HMS Illustrious Strike Group, the HMS Manchester will be integrated into the Truman Carrier Strike Group, and the FS Jean Bart is expected to integrate with the SPS Principe de Asturias Strike Group. For all the rhetoric about European and US friction on the political levels, it would appear no one told the respective Navies not to integrate and cooperate.

All 3 groups will make 6 month patrols.

BTW, Condock V crossed the Strait of Gibraltar escorted by the Boone this morning, so apparently the Boone is repaired and back out to sea, and the first MCM will arrive in Bahrain in mid January.
 
Quote    Reply

EW3       12/29/2006 10:32:44 PM
We could also be there to ensure a fair fight in Somalia...
 
 
Quote    Reply

Francois       12/29/2006 11:17:35 PM

Do you have a list of escorts for the CdG? My lists for CdG and Illustrious groups at this point are partial.

CdG's Group will leave Toulon on Feb. 8th.
The group will comprise the frigate Cassard, the frigate Duplex, one SNA plus the AOE Marne.
It is noteworthy that the group was to deploy in the Atlantic area, but that plan was changed this month.
The group should also integrate one of the three CTFs (EuroMarFor or/and OEF) when in the IO.
 
Also, French took the lead of the NRF-8.
Are included:
Mistral, Siroco, Orage, Cassard, Guépratte, Meuse and the two MSM Pégase and Verseau. 
BTW, Condock V crossed the Strait of Gibraltar
escorted by the Boone this morning, so apparently the Boone is repaired and back out to sea, and the first MCM will arrive in Bahrain in mid January.

One more MCM is on the way.
 
Also, the Spannish PdA group is not supposed to deploy beyond Suez Canal, but that may change quickly.
 
You know the composition of the Ashland group?
Can't believe it is sailing alone there.
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy