The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 25, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Comparison between the Navies of India and China
mithradates    11/26/2005 5:26:04 PM
Navy Comparison:

There have been much talk of India's navy being a "blue water" navy. Or that it's stronger than the navy of China. I've decided to do a detailed comparison between the two navies and find out which nation holds the quantitative and qualitative advantages.

This is just looking at CURRENT inventory counts for both countries. All vessels listed are either deployed or at least in sea trials. Vessels that are under construction, in refit in 3rd countries, projected to be built, or still in purchase negotiations from 3rd countries are not counted(due to them not actually being in the navy).

Additionally, those vessels whose technology is from the late 1980s(Western Level) and above is considered "modern". This is because under competant crews, such vessels can pose a significant threat to western vessels of the same class.


Here's what I found for India:

Aircraft Carriers
Centaur Class 1 in service

Guided-Missile Destroyers: 8 (3 modern)
Type 15 Delhi Class: 3
Rajput {Kashin II}:5

Guided-Missile Frigates Project 17: 9 (3 Modern)
Type 16 Godavari Class: 3
Krivak III Class: 3
Type 16A Brahmaputra Class: 3

Guided-Missile Corvettes Project 28: 21 ( 4 modern )
Type 25A Kora Class: 4
Type 25 Khukri Class: 4
Veer Class: 13

link


Here's their sub fleet...

Diesel Electric Subs (12 Modern)
Foxtrot Class:2
Kilo Class: 9(9 modern, 1 being refitted in Ukraine)
HDW 209: 3(3 modern, 1 being refitted in Germany)

link

So for India:

1 carrier
8 missile Destroyers (3 modern)
9 missile Frigates (3 modern)
21 missile Corvettes (4 modern)
14 Diesel Subs (12 modern)


Here's what I found for China:

Air defence missile destroyers: (4 modern)
Type 052C: 2 (Indigenous(stolen) Phased Array Radar)
Type 052B: 2 (Russian Phased Array Radar)

Guided-Missile Destroyers: 28 (11 modern)
Sovremenny class: 2 (2 modern)
TYPE 051B: 1 (1 modern)
Type 052: 2 (2 modern)
Type 051G: 6 (6 modern)
Type 051: 17

link

Air Defense Missle Frigates: 2 (2 modern):
Type 054: 2(2 modern)

Guided-Missile Frigates: 41 (21 modern) :
Type 053H2G: 12 (12 modern)
Type 053H1G: 6 (12 modern)
Type 053H2: 3 (3 modern)
Type 053H: 20

link

Guided-Missile Corvettes: 67 (15 modern):
Type 2208(stealthy Catamaran vessel): 3 (3 modern)
Type 520T: 5 (5 modern)
Type 037-II: 19 (7 modern after mid 90s refit)
Type 021: ~40

link


Nuclear Submarines : 8 (2 modern)
Type 094: 1 (1 modern in sea trials)
Type 093: 1 (1 modern in sea trials)
Type 092: 1
Type 091: 5

AIP Submarines: 2 (2 modern)
Type 040(Yuan): 2 (2 modern, 1 in sea trials)

Diesel Electric Submarines: 63 ( 22 modern )
Kilo Class: 7 (7 modern)
Type 039(Song): 9 (9 modern)
Type 035(Ming): 17 (6 modern Type 035Gs)
Type 033(Romeo): 30

link

Thus here's the comparison between India's and China's respective navies:

Carrier:
India: 1
China: 0

Modern Air defence missile destroyers:
China: 4
India: 0

Modern Guided missile Destroyers:
China: 21
India: 3

Second Line Guided missile Destroyers:
China: 17
India: 5

Modern Air defence missile frigates:
China: 2
India: 0

Modern Guided-Missile Frigates:
China: 21
India: 3

Second Line Guided-Missile Frigates:
China: 20
India: 6

Modern Guided Missile Corvettes:
China: 15
India: 4

Second Line Guided Missile Corvettes:
China: 52
India: 17

Modern Nuclear Subs:
China: 2
India: 0

Second Line Nuclear Subs:
China: 6
India: 0

AIP Subs:
China: 2
India: 0

Modern Diesel electric Subs:
China: 22
India: 12

Second Line Diesel electric subs:
China: 41
India: 2


Aside from India's single aircraft carrier, the PLAN seems to have a significant advantage over the Indian navy in both QUANTITY and QUALITY.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT
Pseudonym    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 12:56:10 PM
"But as for your above quote, Mithradates, I wonder what PLAN ship you're talking about **today** since the Type 052B and 052C have (if I recall correctly, so definitely correct me if I'm wrong) about 48 to maybe 64 VLS missiles that are SA-10 copies (the HHQ-9), and thus have a range of 90km. Specifically, this doesn't equal the capability to stop "~150 ASCMs" at "200-250km"." It's quite simple, they are the Middle Kingdom so all actual capabilities are doubled or more for public consumption. Gotta keep them happy somehow and nationalism works alot better than communism on that account.
 
Quote    Reply

Pseudonym    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 12:57:00 PM
"However, 2 ships should be capable of stopping around ~150 ASCMs from hitting a fleet." ROFL
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 1:04:21 PM
Hey....I admit when I've made a factual mistake. Unlike most posters.
 
Quote    Reply

Pseudonym    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 1:12:46 PM
"Hey....I admit when I've made a factual mistake. Unlike most posters." So do I. Now 2 ships taking out 150 ascm's is ludicrous. The US Navy wouldn't get that many, let alone technology from earlier generations.
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    the point of this entire discussion   11/27/2005 1:15:37 PM
is just a comparative analysis of Fleet strengths between the 2 countries. The people at the India board has an over-inflated estimation of their naval power. It's the belief that India is a "BLUE" water navy with their current assets that I'm trying to dispell. Think about it this way. We chinese are just beginning to understand the underlying techniques and technologies of running a modern navy. We KNOW that our navy is very WEAK for a nation of our size. We KNOW that our navy is BY FAR the weakest branch of our armed forces. We know and accept these FACTS. But here are also the facts, our WEAK "green-water" Navy seems to outclass that of the India's "blue-water" navy in almost every sector both numerically AND technologically. And keep in mind, the India navy is easily their military's STRONGEST branch.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy    RE:the point of this entire discussion   11/27/2005 1:24:11 PM
I don't think the navy is Indias strongest branch. As with China, I think her army and then her airforce come first. My opinion of Chinese capabilities probably is an understatement, due to my having read so much pro-Chinese dribble and becoming jaded as a result, I freely admit that. However, there really is far more to the equation than number of hulls. I believe that China could defeat the Republic of China, but I do not think they are capable of further afield, blue water operations. Same goes for India, both nations are regional powers, not international powers with true blue water abilities.
 
Quote    Reply

dabrownguy    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 3:52:36 PM
But almost everyship in the InN has VLS Baraks. Don't forget the Ak-630 and Khastan's as well as the Shtil on the Delhis and Talwars. The Isreali Star 3d radar can detect AShM at low low at 25 km off while hi low detection is even greater. 15 km is for the STGR radar used to guide the Barak VLS. Read the freakin page first. Does China even have 200 or even 100 km range AShM missile? No. You don't under stand naval technology at all! low low interception of AShM happens 30 km in! The S-300 isn't even capable of engaging low low cruise missiles with much success. Thats why the Russians had Khastan and Geckos. We have yet to anything about the 052C! Its easy to get PAR of 4 PAR on ship! Ask the Germans. PAR is just land PAR on ship. The Russians had PAR. Tell me how that turned out! And the 052C is no way an AEGIS so stop hyping. Ask Naval experts and they'll tell you the same. Also does the PLAN have the capability to stop Barhmos or a salvo attack switchblades on low low and what about the Sea Eagles launched by the Harriers? Two 052C can not stop 150 AShM! Not even 150 jets! They don't even have enough missiles so that proves your math. Also the InN detection is greater because of AEW on the Ka-31. So tell at what range can the HQ-9 engage a low attitude AShM? Its gotta be less. Take into horizon view. So you have the most mistakes i've ever seen. So tell me how the PLAN protect her fleet against AShM from the InN? HQ-9 can only engage AShM at low low at a 30KM range. The InN can do the same with Shtil on the Talway and Delhi with 6 second reload time on the rail launchers. The Delhis have two rail launchers meaning a launch of missiles every 3-4 seconds. Plus 3 Delhis, 3 Talwars and god knows how many Baraks. Plust take into consideration the VLS Shtil on the upcoming Gorkchav, the P-17 in the making and the P-15A with VLS Shtil.
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    RE:Indian Ignorance of Weapons systems   11/27/2005 5:24:52 PM
"But almost everyship in the InN has VLS Baraks. Don't forget the Ak-630 and Khastan's as well as the Shtil on the Delhis and Talwars." Everything you've mentioned are just point defense systems. Everybody has them. But the fact of the matter is that your point defense missiles have a range of 10-15km, your ship radars have a range of 15-25 kms. Your navy has very few capital ships,and even fewer of them are even equipped with modern ASCMs(I'll adress this point shortly). Please at least find out the difference between area-defense systems, point-defense systems, and close-in defense systems, before asserting your(highly emotional) but non-sensical points. "Does China even have 200 or even 100 km range AShM missile?" C803 with a range of 250 km (supersonic) C802 with a range of 120km (subsonic) SS-N-22 with a range of 100 km (supersonic) "Its easy to get PAR of 4 PAR on ship! Ask the Germans. " It could be easy, though one wonders why the Indian navy can't accomplish such an easy task? The benefits of a PAR air defense missile ship is obvious, fleet-wide integrated air-defense. "Also does the PLAN have the capability to stop Barhmos" Firstly, a little bit on the Brahmos. It's a capable missile, I don't deny that, but there are a few problems: 1. It has not been deployed into the Indian navy yet. It had just passed the prototype phase and is now in the middle of military sea trials. After it passes that, then ships that can accomdate these missiles will have to be refitted with them. This entire process will take at least another 2 to 3 years at the earliest. 2. Over 70% of the components of the Brahmos missile is manufactured in Russia, NOT India. What happens if your supply of components are cut off? India's industries are not nearly mature enough to manufacture the entire missile by itself. "or a salvo attack switchblades on low low" China has a 3 tiered defense, the 052s will try to intercept from beyond the horizon (70 to 100 km) with the help of AWACs, if that fails, it'll coordinate the point-defense systems on individual ships to intercept( 5 to 15 km). If that fails, then close-in defenses(1 to 2 km) will come into play. Now every ship in the entire Chinese capital fleet (all Destroyers, Frigates, Corvettes) has minimally point and close-in defense systems. There are 4 destroyers and 2 Frigates in the PLAN with PAR style area defense systems. Clearly this system is not full proof, there's no such thing as 100% security against an ASCM barrage. Now for India, you guys really only have a 1-tier defense, that is your point missile defense systems. Now several(4) of your Kashin class destroyers do have close-in defense systems(Ak-630 ), but the bulk of your surface fleet do not.
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    More on Indian ASCMs   11/27/2005 6:31:06 PM
Here is the BR sites description of the Brahmos missile: "The missile has a range of ~300 km at 14,000 metres or 120 km at 10 to 15 metres. The missile is believed to have a first stage solid-fuelled booster and a second stage liquid-fuelled ramjet." So as a sea skimmer, it's range is only 120km. And aside from 4 silos on the Destroyer Rajput for navy trial purposes, the Brahmos isn't actually DEPLOYED in the Indian navy. Instead the most advanced ship based ASCM currently deployed in the Indian surface fleet is the Russian SS-N-2D. Thus the ASCM that India's surface fleet is using only has a range of 80km.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy    RE:More on Indian ASCMs   11/27/2005 6:38:21 PM
Only 80km's? Does it matter? Neither navy has over the horizon guidance abilities do they?
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    RE:More on Indian ASCMs   11/27/2005 6:39:45 PM
Right now, only China does.
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    RE:the point of this entire discussion   11/27/2005 7:32:43 PM
"I don't think the navy is Indias strongest branch. As with China, I think her army and then her airforce come first." India is shielded by the Himalayas and hedged on the east and west with much weaker neighbors. As such it's almost as if the Indian subcontient is an island onto itself. Thus, if one were to look at their defense expenditures over the last 25 years, one would see that the Navy has consistently taken up the lions share of funding. Well over that of the army and airforce.
 
Quote    Reply

mithradates    coolboyjay   11/27/2005 7:55:11 PM
The sources that I've listed are all valid. Personal attacks won't create ships out of nothing, nor will it make the navy of your country anything more than the brown water navy that it is.
 
Quote    Reply

blod_sweat_n_code    To Mr.Mithradates   11/28/2005 5:10:57 AM
Very well,u needed a thread to boast about your navy having this and ur navy having that...but shall i tell u something U GUYS DNT HAVE ......!!A VOTE!!....... So lie back relax and think about it.
 
Quote    Reply

PacEMakeR    RE:mithradates   11/28/2005 5:22:45 AM
The Indian Navy only receives 15% of the annual defence budget. The Army and Air Force get the lions share of the budget. This trend has been present since independance.
 
Quote    Reply
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4   NEXT



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy