Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armed Forces of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system
Night Stalker    8/5/2002 9:01:14 AM
After the Gulf War, the U.S. Media reported that it wasn?t known if the Patriot Anti-missile system really worked because Iraqi Scuds actually broke up upon re-entry. Can anyone inform me, either way, on how well the Patriot system or Scuds function?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
nakito    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/5/2002 9:15:05 AM
Apparently the Patriots were given inercept algorithims for SCUDs. Iraq was using modified SCUD (Al H.....) with slightly different ballistics thus the Patriots were detonating behind the missiles. PAC-3 is supposed to have limited ABM capability. I'd imagine the only systems superior are S-300/400 and the Arrow I/II.
 
Quote    Reply

bsl    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/5/2002 9:47:18 PM
The final Bomb Damage Assessments done on the attempted intercepts admitted that there were **no** successful intercepts of Scuds aimed at Israel. I don't know what the conclusions were with respect to Saudi Arabia. There have been upgrades of the system since then; some of them said to have been designed to increase the capability to hit Scuds. How effective they are I can't say.
 
Quote    Reply

mustavaris    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/5/2002 11:42:30 PM
None of the Patriots launched in Gulf War did destroy the Scuds and the best they did was that they knocked those missiles off from their way to their targets (thatīs why there wasnt any succesful intercepts). Those modified Scuds already had huge CEP hit desert for almost 100% sure after such impact- as far as I remember over 70% of Patriots never came close to Scuds and thatīs why many missiles were launched at one time against one Scud. Some time ago Russians scored the first kill with anti-ballistic missile when they managed to destroy Scud with S-300Vīs missile. I donīt know if Arrow can do that but at least it much be far more accurate than Patriot and then more probable to knock the missile off its trajectory. In any case Saddam doesnt have many missiles/launchers left and the worst that can happen from my point of view is that he might use VX or other nerve gas against American troops- Israeli response to chem attack would be far more lethal than USīs. Although you can expect that a rat in a dead end will bite as hard as it cans anyone who is close enough.
 
Quote    Reply

nakito    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/6/2002 8:38:09 AM
with the proper ballistic solutions the Patriot could have intercepted a SCUD unfortunately it was given the solutions for a nearly-like missile which had different ballistic qualities. PAC-3, I would hope, is much improved.
 
Quote    Reply

mustavaris    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/6/2002 12:44:28 PM
It must be remembered that even the direct hit by Patriot missile isnt enough to fuse Scudīs warhead (and destroy it). It still only knocks the missile off the trajectory. S-300V was the first one to do that. Probably PAC-3 could be better than Patriot if they can get those problems solved.
 
Quote    Reply

Night Stalker    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/6/2002 8:19:12 PM
So, in generally, the Scuds were knocked off trajectory, but is that enough to (apparently) cause them to break up? Or, in general, did the Scuds simply fail as a weapon? Enlighten me.
 
Quote    Reply

mustavaris    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/6/2002 11:47:36 PM
Patriot wasnt enough to break a Scud (they didnt make the warhead to explode) but it made them miss their targets. Scud is not an accurate weapon and with conventional warhead the only reasonable targets are wide area targets and after being hit by Patriot they probably miss their target. It must be remembered that Scud is an old design and the reason for its use is that it is simple and (relatively) cheap and your enemy will have great difficulties to protect himself- not very reliable nor accurate weapon but an easy way to threat your enemy especially if you have (or you are thought to have) non-conventional warheads for your missiles. CEP of Scud (the radius of area where 50% of missiles hit) can be well over a mile. So you can imagine that its only useful as a terror weapon or with non-conventional warhead. Modernized Scud variants tend to have longer range but improving the accuracy seems to be harder. At the best CEP is still counted hundreds of meters and it isnt a precision weapon then either.
 
Quote    Reply

ben    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/19/2002 4:23:27 PM
When I was serving in the gulf,my platoon did manage to knock down a scud with a 66mm rocket launcher. We were recce the launcher for an attack,when a scud was launched,my 2i/c launched the 66' at it a few seconds after launch,with a direct hit to the scuds side, and the mutherer went crazy and crashed about a mile to our south,the scud warhead must have detonated because the shockwave knocked us on our asses.
 
Quote    Reply

ben    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/19/2002 4:27:14 PM
One time a pac-3 wouldnt launch,so we shoved a small amount of pe-3 explosive in it's booster,and detonated it to get the missile launched. It worked and the missile intercepted a soviet tu-95 carrying a nuclear payload to an american forward staging base. We all recieved military medals and medals of honor.
 
Quote    Reply

Horthy    RE:Regarding Scuds and the Patriot Anti-missile system   8/21/2002 7:37:51 AM
Yes, that reminds me of the time a Russian spyplane (a Bear-D) was shadowing our carrier group. I grabbed the nose of the Standard missile on the launch rail and let my cruiser fire it at the Bear. At the last moment I jumped from the missile to the aircraft, climbed in, took the crew prisoner and landed the plane on the USS John F. Kennedy. Any more realistic war stories, gentlemen?
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.comĐ 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy