The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - January 9, 2009

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Weapons of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Bullet behavior
Amorphous Blob    3/10/2008 12:07:16 AM
I recently read "Hard Corps", a good story of a former gang member's experiences during the invasion of Iraq. (He was awarded the Silver Star.) He was describing one firefight where he had a shot at a guy standing sideways to him, but hesitated and then aimed at the guy's head because "bullets can bounce off ribs". Is this really a factor to consider? Would it happen with a .30 caliber round? Why would it happen with ribs and not a skull?
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

GOP       3/10/2008 12:48:24 AM

I recently read "Hard Corps", a good story of a former gang member's experiences during the invasion of Iraq. (He was awarded the Silver Star.) He was describing one firefight where he had a shot at a guy standing sideways to him, but hesitated and then aimed at the guy's head because "bullets can bounce off ribs". Is this really a factor to consider? Would it happen with a .30 caliber round? Why would it happen with ribs and not a skull?

That sounds like total bs to me. Bullets, such as that of a .30 caliber round, has enough terminal performance to smash right through ribs easily. Heck, a 7.62x39 or .308 can go through cinderblock and cement. So, the guy sounds like he doesn't know what he is talking about.
But, I could definitely be wrong. And if thats the case, then my apologies.
 
Quote    Reply

smitty237    Doubtful, but......   3/10/2008 1:05:22 AM
GOP is right, but I don't know if I would call what he said "BS".  I believe the author probably heard it from someone somewhere and may even believe it, but that doesn't make it so.  For the most part a bullet is not going to be stopped by rib bones, especially something like a .30 cal round, but bullets do funny things sometimes.  We know for a fact that the flight of a bullet is affected by leaves, twigs, and grass as it flies through the air, especially 5.56mm rounds.  I suppose if someone were hit by a bullet that had already expended most of its energy, then its possible it won't have enough juice to penetrate deeply.  I also suppose it is possible that if a bullet struck someone in the ribs at the right angle it could be deflected enough to cause only superficial damage. 
 
The long and short of it is that his reasons for not shooting someone in the side are not very plausible.  If you have the shot, take it.  You always miss the shots you don't take.  It's kind of like the stories you used to hear about "such and such" cartridge being too weak coupled with stories of the enemy taking multiple rounds and not going down.  Of course there are physiological and psychological reasons why the enemy doesn't go down when shot, but I always find it interesting that the story teller never tells us how many of those rounds may have missed, therefore causing no damage whatsoever.  You always need to get the whole story. 
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       3/10/2008 1:17:54 AM
Maybe my comments were too harsh. I just find it ridiculous that he aimed for the head because he felt his shot may be deflected after hitting the ribs. Heck, if the shot is availiable, then take it. Even if the round doesn't have the ability to kill the guy, a injured bad guy > healthy bad guy. Even if the injury is minor.
 
Quote    Reply

Horsesoldier       3/10/2008 6:39:02 AM
Unlikely that rib bones would stop any center fire rifle round at normal combat ranges, so I'd agree with the previous suggestions that the author did describe his thinking but it was based on rumors he'd heard somewhere along the way.
 
Quote    Reply

GOP       3/10/2008 8:23:41 AM

so I'd agree with the previous suggestions that the author did describe his thinking but it was based on rumors he'd heard somewhere along the way.
To me, this sounds like something he'd heard when he was a 'gangster', and it stuck in his mind. Never really been around any 'gansta thugs' before, but given their well known inaccuracy, I wouldn't doubt if they'd believe something like this.  But who knows?

 
Quote    Reply

Ehran       3/10/2008 12:05:36 PM



I recently read "Hard Corps", a good story of a former gang member's experiences during the invasion of Iraq. (He was awarded the Silver Star.) He was describing one firefight where he had a shot at a guy standing sideways to him, but hesitated and then aimed at the guy's head because "bullets can bounce off ribs". Is this really a factor to consider? Would it happen with a .30 caliber round? Why would it happen with ribs and not a skull?


That sounds like total bs to me. Bullets, such as that of a .30 caliber round, has enough terminal performance to smash right through ribs easily. Heck, a 7.62x39 or .308 can go through cinderblock and cement. So, the guy sounds like he doesn't know what he is talking about.

But, I could definitely be wrong. And if thats the case, then my apologies.


have read about bullets doing some pretty odd things like following a rib round and exiting the back or front leaving a rather less than lethal wound but they are improbable enough they really shouldn't be a factor in taking a shot or not.
 
Quote    Reply

Yimmy       3/10/2008 4:58:15 PM



so I'd agree with the previous suggestions that the author did describe his thinking but it was based on rumors he'd heard somewhere along the way.

To me, this sounds like something he'd heard when he was a 'gangster', and it stuck in his mind.
That sounds most likely, and that sort of rubbish should have been drilled out of him during training.  I think it rather questionable allowing him to sign up in the first place, assuming he had a criminal record in association with his being a former gang member.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if he added the rib rubbish in as an afterthought however, to justify nearly missing the enemy, aiming for his torso, but striking him in the head at close quarters.
 
Quote    Reply

Amorphous Blob       3/13/2008 9:01:32 PM
It was a very well-written book.  He didn't come across at all as ignorant or a BS-er.  He didn't try to gloss over what a f***-up he'd been in his teenage years; he said that when he was being given the award he kept half-expecting someone to whisper in the officer's ear and have them call it off.  What do I know, I was never in the service, but he sounded like an outstanding Marine.  He was pretty funny in parts too... in the intro he was talking about how grunts hate this and that, John Kerry and his "stuck in Iraq" remark,... and "that f***-head Anthony Swofford, author of Jarhead".  He read a little bit of the book in Iraq and burned it.
 
Quote    Reply

Mechanic       4/25/2008 10:04:07 AM
Why would the ribs interfere more with a side shot than a chest shot?
 
Quote    Reply

historynut       4/25/2008 12:44:01 PM
Bullets can bounce off windshields if fired at just the right angle. Bullets sometimes fellow the bone and go in side and out the other. Doesn't happen very much but all it takes is to see it happen once.
 
Quote    Reply

Herald12345    Not an expert on rifles.........    4/25/2008 1:49:13 PM
.................but any object passing through matter that has some lateral force applied to it, will suffer deflection or YAW influence. This becomes especially pronounced when you go from one state of matter to another as in from air [gas] to flesh  [plastic solid] and bone [elastic solid]. The tendency to bullet veer will generally be in the direction of least resistance to momentum. At 500 meters per second I can well prove that simple breeze cross wind of about 5 kph will affect bullet  lateral drift in the trajectory. So a bone will prove to be quite an impediment, it will deflect a bullet-even shatter a bullet if the bullet strikes at the right angle and velocity. WATER will deflect or smash a bullet; if the bullet hits with enough kinetic energy.

Will a rib stop a bullet? Not likely. Will it change the trajectory radically? Absolutely.

I don't have to be expert rifleman to prove this. Its physics.

Herald
 
Quote    Reply

larryjcr    Bullet deflection   4/25/2008 2:12:04 PM

.................but any object passing through matter that has some lateral force applied to it, will suffer deflection or YAW influence. This becomes especially pronounced when you go from one state of matter to another as in from air [gas] to flesh  [plastic solid] and bone [elastic solid]. The tendency to bullet veer will generally be in the direction of least resistance to momentum. At 500 meters per second I can well prove that simple breeze cross wind of about 5 kph will affect bullet  lateral drift in the trajectory. So a bone will prove to be quite an impediment, it will deflect a bullet-even shatter a bullet if the bullet strikes at the right angle and velocity. WATER will deflect or smash a bullet; if the bullet hits with enough kinetic energy.

Will a rib stop a bullet? Not likely. Will it change the trajectory radically? Absolutely.

I don't have to be expert rifleman to prove this. Its physics.

Herald

All true, but doesn't matter in this case.  A bullet delected by a rib is still going thru the body, just on a slightly different path.  Once it's inside the torso, it's going to be doing damage in any event.  As for shattering (and I know from personal experience that the lighter Viet Nam era 5.56mm would do that) it would just mean that instead of one bullet punching thru the thorax, a spray of metal and bone shrapnel goes thru doing even more damage.  Take the shot.  Bullets are cheap!
 
Quote    Reply

k3n-54n       5/26/2008 9:57:41 PM
this sounds like something more important for gangs using pistols, probably often .32 auto and smaller.  I would not be at all surprised if ribs offered better protection than the skull against such bullets.  The ribs are a lot thicker, and they are designed as springs (so we can breath) rather than eggshells.  It shouldn't have mattered in this case, but that doesnt mean it is never true.
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy