The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - January 9, 2009

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Weapons of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Modern Flamethrower
32degrees    11/6/2007 2:33:27 AM
In modern warfare would a flamethrower be practical. I don't want to come across as seeming mid evil or archaic but could it still be used to clear a building. For instance in Iraq if a building with insurgents in it was proving to be a problem does it sound feasible for a soldier to use the barrel of a flamethrower to bust through a window and let several bursts go. I see that it has many tactical problems to employ so is it feasible or would a thermobaric grenade be more efficient. As far as modern technologies in fuel and propulsion a interesting design could be possible.
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

andyf       11/6/2007 10:50:14 AM
how about a 'dragons breath 'style round for the 40mm grenade launcher?
an frangible container instead of a grenade, containing finely powdered aluminium and smokeless proppellant
as you fire a burning cloud of Al would erupt from the muzzle
 
Quote    Reply

Herald1234    Thermobaric rocket from your standard infantry rocket launcher?   11/6/2007 10:58:17 AM
Herald
 
Quote    Reply

bob the brit       11/6/2007 2:31:16 PM
the only problem is not always having the option of target recognition. not to mention the things are usually hefty and awkward to say the least. no one wants to try being tactical whilst looking like a scuba-diver.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       11/7/2007 3:09:46 AM
The "human rights" people have effectively banned napalm, so a flame thrower is right out.  Besides, the man portable flame thrower has always been a bit of a desperation weapon, used mainly because there were few effective alternatives.  They are short ranged (<50m, max.), bulky, difficult to deploy, and prone catastrophic failure when hit.  Vehicle mounted versions with their longer range and massive fuel loads (particularly when carried in a towed trailer) are much more practical.
 
Thermobaric warheads on rockets and missiles largely replaced the flame thrower, with a variety of improvised devices filling the remaining needs.
 
I remember one described on this site from a while back that consisted of a barbecue size LPG cylinder, some C-4 and det cord that was supposed to be perfect for bringing down houses in Faluga.
 
Quote    Reply

Rasputin       11/7/2007 4:32:50 AM
I believe there was a previous post about UK troopers using Law 72s with thermobaric rounds.

And they also got the howls of protests from well protesters against thermobaric rocket rounds.

You can also get more russian versions of the weapons, made famous by their inept and disastorous use against chechen rebels to free school children hostages in Beslan.

 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy