Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Weapons of the World Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: PM9 vs S&W 340PD
DarthAmerica    6/6/2006 2:01:59 AM
I've been waiting a while to post on this but I wanted to be in possession of both weapons to make a fair comparison. This will be a bit brief and to the point summary of the pros and cons of these two weapons in the concealed carry role. So without futher delay... PM9- Pros Very concealable(especially width) Very accurate even out to 25 meters Very controllable in rapid fire Sweet trigger Adequate bullet for combat shooting Cons If you carry a loose magazine in a pocket a round or two may work its way out potentially leaving you one or two rounds short. Light trigger pull and no safety makes a holster an absolute must no matter how this weapon is carried. Short grips make for slightly awkward ergonomics. Slower draw compared to S&W 340PD Not heavy by any means but a notable difference compared to the S&W340 PD I cant say enough good things about this weapon. I can hide it anywhere and hit anything I can see out to 25 meters. This auto is one of the best if not the best concealed carry weapon you could get. S&W 340PD- Pros Very concealable Very powerful bullet Very reliable Quick to draw from any position So lite you would forget you had it on you. Cons Ferocious recoil Needs a lighter trigger pull Due to the fact that its a revolver. the cylinder will make it a bit wider profile compared to the PM9. I cant emphasize the recoil enough. Actually made my shooting had bleed! Getting a good accurate rapid follow up shot would be a challenge without a lot of practice. Painful is an understatement. This is definately not a gun for the faint at heart, pain sensitive or those who arent willing to invest the time, pain and suffering required to master it. But if you did, this is the ultimate fight stopper. And due to its weight, you could carry it in almost any type of clothing heavier than swim wear. Conclussion I would have to give the nod to the Kahr. Overall its the more practical of the two guns. The 340PD is a bit much for most people. I hope I'm not being misunderstood. I say that because I know the recoil would turn most off to practice which is a necessity if you plan to use it to its full potential. For me the Karh would fit most of my concealed carry requirements. In the very few cases where it wouldnt due to weight. I would use the 340PD.
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6
bark&bite       11/25/2006 4:05:49 PM

I agree that close quarter scenarios A-E are most likely the type of encounter in which you would need a concealed weapon (there is a theory that you should first try with a less lethal defensive option but I am not entirely sure about that – I do carry a medium size Spyderco Clipit all the time – not so much for self defense though). In all of these situations a one-hand weapon is essential. Other hand will likely be occupied with attempts to gain some distance between you and assailant. I used to carry an US made PPK (mine vas .32 auto, I’m not sure about Bond’s) which I ditched for reliability issues. I got a HK P2000 which is the ONLY pistol with which I personally NEVER witnessed a stoppage of any kind (believe me I tried more than a few – none of the Kahrs though). Anyway the pistol proved too heavy ( 1,5 lb + 13 rounds of 9 mm) for permanent carry and I decided on the S&W. I have some serious doubts on .357 Mags being over-penetrating with the FMJ bullets I must use with defensive carry for legal reasons.   

 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       11/26/2006 2:43:20 PM

Also, my point in the above post was that carrying concealed for protection anticipates a situation that has little resemblance to shooting plates in a match at a range, putting holes in paper or even being in a gun fight. But there are reasons why you might not want to carry magnum loads.

My point is that magnum just like 9mm rounds require realistic training. Magnum rounds out of a lightweight revolver will beat up a shooter to the point that most people will shy away from the type of training necessary to master such an weapon. An untrained shooter may get lucky in a gunfight. But thats all it will be. The physics of a higher recoil weapon will make such weapons harder to hit with whether or not the shooter is aware of it due to adrenaline. The Magnum physically recoils harder than a 9mm regardless of perception which means that the shooter will have to move the weapon back onto the target. The more movement, the more difficult the follow up shot. Then you have to add in the stress of the gunfight. It matters. But these problems apply to ANY PISTOL/REVOLVER caliber. The only remedy is training, again regardless of caliber. Because of the harsh recoil and cost vs 9mm, an adequate amount of training is questionable for most shooters.

DA
 
Quote    Reply

rockymtnclimber    340PD & FMJ's    11/27/2006 7:45:02 PM
 
Bark,
 
There are a couple of MFG (Speer/Gold Dot for one) who sell a hybrid FMJ that has a fully jacketed tip with a bonded core that allows some expansion. They resolve the "must carry fmj's" requirement by some backward thinking LE departments and probably the military.
 
I don't think that those are optimal for this pistol but you may find that to be a good solution to your mentioned legal requirment.
 
The 340PD is a slick pistol that I have been carrying for over a year. The reason I like it so much is that it is very flexible in the way you can employ it. The .357/.38+p aspect allows you to carry a very powerful pistol in circumstances that might require it (such as in the back country where black bears and mountain lions might be lurking) and down load it with "short barrell magnums or +P.38 loads for more conventional concealed carry. Kramer Leather (kramerleather.com) makes a real good pocket holster for the hammerless  J frame that just disappears in your slacks/Dockers front pocket. Uncle Mikes makes a less expensive sock type holster that I use when wearing tight jeans. Both are reasonably easy to draw with practice.
 
My experience in shooting over 1000 rounds through mine is that the full house magnum 158gr type load is a two handed affair to control, for me. Where shooting Federal Low recoil loads (still pretty hot for this pistol) or the Gold Dot Short Barrel .357's (my favorite daily carry) can be employed with weak hand/strong single hand shooting. Practice is always important with a hand gun but is reallllly critical with this pistol. Given that, this pistol is well made and has great inherit accuracy. As I mentioned in a earlier post, I shot a coyote with mine while working on fences on one of our leases. The coyote jumped up and ran 35 yards up the hill and stood staring at me. I pulled Mr.S&W out of my front pocket and drilled him through the chest. I just held and squeezed as if I was holding a target pistol.
 
I think you made a good purchase Bark
 
Check Six
 
Rocky
 
 
Quote    Reply

rockymtnclimber    BarkBite & .357 Overpenetrating   11/27/2006 9:46:17 PM
 
Bark, I don't know if I have ever heard of a pistol cartridge over penetrating a bad guy and then going on to injure a innocent 3rd party.
Know your target and beyond is always a rule with all guns but I don't know that I would make a defense weapon purchase based upon that criteria...
 
Check Six
 
Rocky
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica    UPDATE   1/24/2007 1:21:13 PM
Been testing the PM9 for ~2 years now. During that time I've had a chance to compare it to at least a dozen alternatives. Hands down its the best CCW weapon in my specific circumstance and I suspect it would serve most people equally well. The S&W 340PD compares very well in some situations, especially in cold weather, but nothing beats the Kahr. Criteria I used...

Power
Capacity
Size
weight
Accuracy
Comfort

The only thing I hate is that it requires a little too much effort to break down and the recoil spring need to be replaced every ~2000-3000 rnds.

DA

 
Quote    Reply

Deputy    Ammo choices   12/30/2007 4:23:39 AM
Hey, Darth,
     I've got a couple of the smaller Kahrs (one with the stainless slide and one with the DLC finish), and more versions of the Centennial than I can count.  But one of the Smiths is the 340PD with the Scandium/titanium/.357 capability, and I use it sometimes on personal protection assignments when I'm wearing a tux (It's too tailored to handle anything any bigger, and the "organic" shape of a small revolver sometimes sticks out less than the flat blockiness of even a small semi-auto.).  I'm both a licensed cop and a security officer in Texas, by the way; and I do know my way around firearms after years of competition, 'smithing, collecting, etc.  And I'm sorry about the slow response, but I just happened upon this website tonight for the first time.
     As far as ammo goes with the super-light Smith, I've found that MagSafe's +P .38 Spl. combined with Eagle's Secret Service grips with a couple of finger grooves and checkering give me a terrific hold for initial and follow-up shots.  As for the revolver's heavy trigger, I'm my own 'smith, and I've fixed that by making it both smoother and a little bit lighter.  But with such a light gun and relatively heavy recoil, I find that a heavier trigger helps to encourage a firm grip on any handgun from the get-go.
   Anyhow, those MagSafes (Or Glasers, if you prefer that brand and its choice of Blues or Silvers.) in the caliber I mentioned have far greater stopping power than almost any .357 Magnum without the kick, more stopping power than any traditional .38 Spl., they're plenty accurate for the intended use, and--being a recoil-avoider to the core--I find that they don't punish me any more than +P, much less the +P+ SXTs, 9mm ammo out of the mini-Kahrs.
     Just thought I'd give you my thoughts, for what they're worth.
 
 
Quote    Reply

DarthAmerica       12/30/2007 4:53:47 AM
Your comments are appreciated. Welcome to the boards. I'll have to try these loads when I get stateside. Sometimes I worry about having enough penetration to deal with light barriers such as windows, car doors and the like. I've actually encountered a situation like that before but with a .45 ACP through a door and stain glass window. The rounds were either 165 gr or 185 gr Federal Hydrashoks(I can't remember the exact weight). It worked pretty well.
 
 
-DA
 
Quote    Reply

RockyMTNClimber    2,000 rounds and counting   7/4/2009 3:15:16 PM
I've had my 340PD as my primary concealed carry gun for some 4 years now and I have run over 2,000 rounds through it, 70% .38 special and 30% a mix of various .357 magnums. Problems have been minimal for this gun especially given the near continuous service it has provided me whether in the urban jungle or in the backwoods of Colorado. I've noticed a little scoring on the cut shield something that Norm warned about in his post back in 2006 or so. It isn't bad but I will continue to watch it. Other than that, my pistol is very tight and if anything the trigger pull has smoothed nicely through regular practice.
 
The Smith "J" frame continues to be a legend in self defense firearms and the 340PD is the top of that evolution in my opinion. Not adequate for a police officer's primary weapon but certainly acceptable for off duty carry, civilian CCW, or home defense. 
 
Check Six
 
Rocky
 
 
Quote    Reply

Ispose    My 2 cents   7/6/2009 12:05:09 PM
I prefer the Ruger SP101 for a short barreled revolver...nice heft, I have big hands but it fits well, .357 Mag so you don't have to shoot them twice...As far as Autloaders...nobodys made anything better than the 1911A1.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy