Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Space Operations Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: The Russians Change Their Minds
SYSOP    8/18/2014 5:26:08 AM
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
keffler25       8/18/2014 7:57:47 AM
The Russians RD-180 is suspect. Why the HELL would any US launcher (Atlas) use the damn things? 
 
It turns out that such alternate sources are available in the U.S. and someone apparently explained to the Russian leadership that interrupting shipments of the RD-180s risks seeing the American, and other, foreign customers for these engines disappear.
 
Thus making that capability in Russia disappear.
 
And that would be a GOOD thing.... for the US.
 
It's not like the Rocketdyne J-2 is going anywhere, now is it? 
 
The plans for the aerospike version for that motor still exist.  
 
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       8/18/2014 2:34:09 PM
Any idea when the Falcon Heavy will launch?  They only have 4 months left to the end of the year!
 
Quote    Reply

keffler25       8/18/2014 3:00:44 PM

 
 
Sheesh. Don't people get a decent science education anymore? 
 
 
Quote    Reply

keffler25       8/18/2014 3:02:36 PM
Any idea when the Falcon Heavy will launch?  They only have 4 months left to the end of the year!
  
 
If Space X can work the bugs out of the their cross-feed system, Solar Probe Plus is the first government paying mission possible. Mid 2015. Next one is this TURKEY which I predict will be a total disaster, like most of the BEE ESS that Obama's lawyer-run space program has tried to recently foist.      
 
 
Sheesh. Don't people get a decent science education anymore? 
 
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       8/18/2014 3:34:25 PM
It's not like the Rocketdyne J-2 is going anywhere, now is it? 
I think you mean the Rocketdyne J-2X. It’s a whole different beasty from the J-2.
The plans for the aerospike version for that motor still exist.  
 
Their aim is to get 400kg into LEO for less than $10 million. No idea when they are scheduled for the 1st launch.
 
Quote    Reply

mivenho       8/18/2014 3:42:38 PM
"(SpaceX is) simply going to take another year to satisfy all the bureaucrats and regulations."
 
 "Lockheed Martin and Boeing have lots of friends in Congress and that may prove to be the deciding factor into keeping government launch services an expensive monopoly."
 
Pretty much sums up the problem with gov't contracts. 
 
Quote    Reply

keffler25       8/18/2014 4:13:43 PM
The J-2X was/is a botched design that traced its root causes to the incompetents who mismanaged the Ares rocket. The test fire program (test stands less than a three hours from where I live), have been shut down for most of 2014 while the engineers wait on money to FIX the inter-cooler problem with a series of hardware tests that their computer modeling approach failed to uncover before they melted one of their TWO test motors. Lucky it didn't blow up!  
 
No government money... no government motor. My money is still on Falcon. One year ain't going to change those numbers. They're building their own launch facility in a nuts-to-you-NASA, type setup. If they launch from their own facilities, all they have to fight is the FAA. I know Georgia would love to become a part of the business (Camden County. Florida would like to be it, but with its screwed up government, I dunno. My money is on TEXAS.      
 
Don't know much about the methane rocket. At first glance it smells like a con job sort of like that British rocket startup was a few years ago. That is not a proper aerospike.
 
If they get it to work, more power to them.  
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       8/19/2014 3:29:01 AM
With you on the Falcon.  Hope they can ramp up the production fast, particular on the Falcon Heavy when it proves itself.
 
Quote    Reply

keffler25       8/19/2014 8:20:03 AM
Flusterclucking rocket motors makes me nervous.
 
 
In no other machine does KISS matter so much, and even then you better make sure all your design critical fails are fail-nevers.
 
Four loss of missions and the Russians know flusterclucks are a very very bad idea. Now I see Firefly (a multiple methane independent nozzle ring burner BOMB-reminiscent of how not to design a Moon rocket.) and Falcon Heavy (27 engines all piped together in a common feeder tree that includes strap on boosters!) and I cringe.   

With you on the Falcon.  Hope they can ramp up the production fast, particular on the Falcon Heavy when it proves itself.

 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics