The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 25, 2009




New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 
Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
How to Behave on an Internet Forum
The Electronic Battlefield Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles
Ken Gardner    3/30/2001 8:40:39 PM
The value that industrialized societies place on human life high. We spend increasingly larger amounts of money to preserve the lives of our own people; medical spending is enormous, cars have expensive airbags, seatbelt laws are legislated. A military example is found in Desert Storm. The allies spent a great deal of money and had very few casulties. It's cheaper for the industrialized to spend materials than blood. The less industrialized nations, such as Iraq or China, find lives cheaper than materials.
It seems computing power will continue to advance, and that one day we will have autonomous military vehicles that won't suffer human casulties if destroyed. We already have autonomouse weapons systems; the guided missile has replaced the kamikaze. The unmanned recon planes are unmanned, air-based vehicles. It follows that some day there will be weapons systems fulfilling the roll of armor that doesn't have any humans on board.

 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

stratego    RE:Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles   9/21/2004 11:36:25 PM
Yes, well, it seems, at first, that unmanned armor woudl be easier to do than unmanned flying. Doesn't flying require more skill from a human than driving a tank? (Uh, maybe I better take cover now.)
 
Quote    Reply

vertical    RE:Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles   12/30/2004 10:43:57 PM
Consider this hearsay, but I read some where that a rocket was fired at a target from an UAV. Not a precision guided munition, just an unguided rocket. My thought at the time was "big deal" but in retrospect, it was a start. I'll see if I can find the news article.
 
Quote    Reply

Eagle601    RE:Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles   12/31/2004 2:34:45 AM
Predator drones have been firing Hellfires since the war in Afghanistan. The Air Force is testing the X-45, which is designed as as an unmanned attack plane, possibly for attacking air defense sites.
 
Quote    Reply

lennard    RE:Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles   1/22/2005 5:50:55 AM
With increasing globalisation it would be a smarter move from the US to spend money on creating strong, mutual beneficiary, bonds between the US and other countries than it is to waste it on high tech weaponry. Otherwise one day you will find that China or, of all places, the EU has taken over your position as a world leader, because they used their money productively on education, free trade and industry.
 
Quote    Reply

EW3    RE:Manned vs. Unmanned Vehicles   4/15/2005 9:49:09 PM
I thought the 60s were over.
 
Quote    Reply



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy