The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - December 4, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
The Electronic Battlefield Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Smart Phones In Combat
SYSOP    10/10/2008 5:48:34 AM
 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

trenchsol       10/10/2008 8:53:56 AM
As far as I understand, laptops were carried by officers. They could be regarded as responsible persons making who take data security in account and make sure that laptop does not contain data that do not belong there. If the rank and file is given such a powerful data storage as modern cell phone is, some of them might store unappropriate information in it.  There is no problem finding an encrypted file system for laptop, in fact modern operating system are supporting them out of the box, and even more sophisticated could be added. I have not heard of anything like that for cell phones, which might be due to a fact that I am much more into computers than cellphones.
 
DG


 
Quote    Reply

colforbin       10/10/2008 10:31:13 AM
go linux!
 
Quote    Reply

Mike From Brielle       10/14/2008 3:36:11 PM
Many of the things mentioned in the article pertain mainly to applications that really have limited relationship with the functionality of a phone or radio per se; to communicate information.  A radio or phone interrelates with the application in so much as the device has the power and band width to support the desired applications.  I consider a phone, wirelelss or not, to depend on the presence of a fixed infrastructure to support its functionality whereas a set of pure radios may communicate between themselves independent of a infrastructure.   A phone often has to trade off power in order to achieve greater bandwidth to satisfy applications but therefor has to make the application less mobile in order to stay close to the supporting infrastructure (which itself can have limited mobility) but the phone can be much simpler ($) because of the services provided by the infrastructure to the phone.  Radios can have the power, band width, and network heaped on top of them at the cost of complexity and exspense but enable the user with operational flexability.  
Presently there are many hybrid solutions which have different sizes and shapes of network and transport layers heaped upon them in order to acquire different performance criteria.  In my opinion thou one size doesn't and can't fit all requirements.  There has to be, IMHO, a decision made about what overlapping requirements are needed where. 
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy