Only one correct response. You are a liar. Its in print, fool, for all to read.

 

Try this one. GTHYISLPOS.

 

No, GOOGLE won't help you.   

 

H.

 

   

 

the last two statements basically nothing but desperate comments of someone who lost his credibility in conversation.

 

especially that... rocket scientist of strategypage.com forum :) 

I said I wrote about rocketry and aviation here, imbecile. Apparently you lack sixth grade comprehension skills as well as a moral compass.

 

Ignore set on.

 

H.

 

.  

it just weird how you, especially heraldabc just ignores what i say, so you start some topic, then when i go deep in it, you just trying to suppress it up and deny everything. what a failure.

 

I gave thorough explanation  of why you do not need high end general purpose computers in embedded systems like electronics of tank... and this idiot told thing like "supercomputers? oh you already expert in that"

 

no really dont you think it looks retard? and then i said, wtf, are you yourself rocket expert? (cus he started talking about as hes so much into it) and now he writes that he WROTE about that here... in other words, you all are basically trying to loose the conversation, because you are lacking credibility and real facts, and by yourselfs, do not represent any type of educated person... i.e. just bragging. i wonder how many people like are in US? :) i hope not so many... lol..

Your thorough explanation was that you knew someone who had (what you considered) an "expensive" computer (US dollar equivalent $20) that performed like "shit". Which has absolutely nothing to do with the FCS in a main battle tank. Because you even think that is somehow relevant proves just how dumb you really are.

 

Hey, I know a Russian who is gay, That must mean you are gay too since you are Russian! That's about the level your thinking is at.

look stupid creature, my point was that in an application specific systems you do not need very powerfull supercomputer, you need a specialized digital chip which just supports functions needed by your system, is your brain fried to understand that? wtf are you talking at all?

 

and the point of my explanation above (paraphrased 1000 times for idiots like you) was brought because someone mentioned that USA has 30 supercomputers, Russia less. 

 

and basically with that explanation i wanted to show that you do not need supercomputer in every device, that actually wont help much, all you need is robust good electronics which does some specific job, but does it good!

 

now if you stil didnt get the point it means your intelligentce level is of bugs or roaches. and i cant help you then.