Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armor Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Russian T90 vs. US M1A2 Abrams
achtpanz    6/14/2004 3:59:14 AM
Russian T90 vs American M1A2 Abrams - Which is better? If these tanks fought in battle, which would suffer more casualties, which one is superior? What are their advantages? Any information would be helpful.
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
heraldabc       3/4/2011 6:50:14 PM

well represented here in aviation and rocketry? so ur a specialist of a quite broad range huh? why not aviation rockets and navy? ...oh and tanks too since you involved in tank conversation lol

 

the more some of you go the more funny you look, and it was not me who used name calling first.



Only one correct response. You are a liar. Its in print, fool, for all to read.
 
Try this one. GTHYISLPOS.
 
No, GOOGLE won't help you.   
 
H.
 
   
 
 
Quote    Reply

SantaClaws       3/4/2011 7:00:30 PM

well represented here in aviation and rocketry? so ur a specialist of a quite broad range huh? why not aviation rockets and navy? ...oh and tanks too since you involved in tank conversation lol

 

the more some of you go the more funny you look, and it was not me who used name calling first.


Remind us again you expertise beyond what you read on the internet and being a Russian fanboy.
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    lol   3/4/2011 9:42:00 PM
the last two statements basically nothing but desperate comments of someone who lost his credibility in conversation.
 
especially that... rocket scientist of strategypage.com forum :) 
 
Quote    Reply

heraldabc       3/4/2011 11:16:37 PM

the last two statements basically nothing but desperate comments of someone who lost his credibility in conversation.

 

especially that... rocket scientist of strategypage.com forum :) 



I said I wrote about rocketry and aviation here, imbecile. Apparently you lack sixth grade comprehension skills as well as a moral compass.
 
Ignore set on.
 
H.

 
.  
 
Quote    Reply

WiggySr    ive Canada ( Canada Computing Company ) general Dynamic credit for the Fire Control Systems of the Abrams & Challenger 2. T-90 thermals are from Franc   3/5/2011 1:49:17 PM
 
Quote    Reply

SantaClaws       3/5/2011 1:51:34 PM

the last two statements basically nothing but desperate comments of someone who lost his credibility in conversation.

 

especially that... rocket scientist of strategypage.com forum :) 



Again, besides having a PHD in ignorance and fanboyism, what are your credentials?
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    lol   3/5/2011 5:54:26 PM
it just weird how you, especially heraldabc just ignores what i say, so you start some topic, then when i go deep in it, you just trying to suppress it up and deny everything. what a failure.
 
I gave thorough explanation  of why you do not need high end general purpose computers in embedded systems like electronics of tank... and this idiot told thing like "supercomputers? oh you already expert in that"
 
no really dont you think it looks retard? and then i said, wtf, are you yourself rocket expert? (cus he started talking about as hes so much into it) and now he writes that he WROTE about that here... in other words, you all are basically trying to loose the conversation, because you are lacking credibility and real facts, and by yourselfs, do not represent any type of educated person... i.e. just bragging. i wonder how many people like are in US? :) i hope not so many... lol..
 
Quote    Reply

SantaClaws       3/5/2011 6:37:09 PM
Your thorough explanation was that you knew someone who had (what you considered) an "expensive" computer (US dollar equivalent $20) that performed like "shit". Which has absolutely nothing to do with the FCS in a main battle tank. Because you even think that is somehow relevant proves just how dumb you really are.
 
Hey, I know a Russian who is gay, That must mean you are gay too since you are Russian! That's about the level your thinking is at.
 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    lol   3/5/2011 7:45:35 PM
look stupid creature, my point was that in an application specific systems you do not need very powerfull supercomputer, you need a specialized digital chip which just supports functions needed by your system, is your brain fried to understand that? wtf are you talking at all?
 
and the point of my explanation above (paraphrased 1000 times for idiots like you) was brought because someone mentioned that USA has 30 supercomputers, Russia less. 
 
and basically with that explanation i wanted to show that you do not need supercomputer in every device, that actually wont help much, all you need is robust good electronics which does some specific job, but does it good!
 
now if you stil didnt get the point it means your intelligentce level is of bugs or roaches. and i cant help you then.
 

 
Quote    Reply

ColdStart    lol   3/5/2011 7:48:46 PM
and about your last example of how i think, its actually you think that way about Russian equipment, im sure anything made in Russia would associate with something bad, our rifles are bad, our tanks bad, aircrafts bad, missiles... only USA can do that well. so yes, you described the way you think.
 
Quote    Reply



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics