Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armor Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?
Edmund    3/16/2006 12:39:58 PM
Can the Chieftain using HESH ammo take out the T-64 or T-72 frontally during the time period 1967 to 1973?
 
Quote    Reply

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest

Pages: 1 2
Yimmy    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/16/2006 1:45:16 PM
I would say yes, certainly. Unless either thank has much spaced armour, which I do not believe they do.
 
Quote    Reply

Edmund    RE:Chieftain HESH vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/16/2006 2:07:59 PM
I don't think they have spaced armour either. But not sure. Just saw some estimates on T-64 and T-72 1967-73 as having between 350 to 400mm armour up front. Also 420mm to 520mm against HEAT. The higher HEAT value is from composites not spaced armour I understand. So was curious whether HESH could stop them. I am not an expert so just asking questions. Thanks.
 
Quote    Reply

Horsesoldier    RE:Chieftain HESH vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/16/2006 4:20:56 PM
The Soviets always claimed the T-64 was superior to the T-72, but the former never having seen any action it is an open question. In any case, I'd think Chieftain HESH would produce acceptable lethality levels against either tank.
 
Quote    Reply

flamingknives    RE:Chieftain HESH vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/16/2006 5:23:25 PM
The 120mm HESH fired by the Conqueror was apparently good for 130mm+ of armour. That might not sound much, but remember that it isn't particularly angle sensitive. 130mm at 60 degrees from the vertical is still just 130mm to HESH. Plus Conqueror was a previous generation to the Chieftain.
 
Quote    Reply

bunkerdestroyer    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/19/2006 12:22:00 AM
I think yes for the t-72 with less armour and not with the t-64..... By then, the t-64 was an improved variant of the earlier models and yet better armour(including optics/engine, etc) and the t-72 was the earliest variant-vunerible to the hesh.....
 
Quote    Reply

Edmund    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/21/2006 9:41:13 AM
Thanks for the replies. I wish they would release information on HESH damage or a video of HESH hitting a T-72. Maybe in another 20 years.
 
Quote    Reply

flamingknives    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/21/2006 4:42:21 PM
Information on HESH damage isn't too hard to come by. You just need to look in the right places. Quite a bit is in the public domain though.
 
Quote    Reply

Desertmole    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/24/2006 8:12:13 AM
Guys, You forgot the T-64 and T-72 both had reactive armor over their hulls and turrets. It would nullify HESH. We had a lot of discussion about it in the late '70s - early '80s when pictures started emerging about them.
 
Quote    Reply

flamingknives    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   3/24/2006 9:38:05 AM
It would nullify HESH once. After that, there wouldn't be any more ERA. Do you happen to know when ERA made it into wide-scale issue?
 
Quote    Reply

Desertmole    RE:Chieftain HESh vs T-64 and T-72 1967 to 1973?   4/8/2006 6:56:58 AM
The Soviets were using it on the T-64 and T-72, but not sure exactly when (mid '70s, I think). The Israelis were, I think, the first Western Army to adopt it, sometime in the '80s. When a round hits the ERA, the only blocks that usually blow are those struck by the projectile. Getting a second round in the same place is tough. You may have to hit the target 3-4 times before you can get a hit on bare armor.
 
Quote    Reply
1 2



StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2012StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy