Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use How to Behave on an Internet Forum
Armor Discussion Board
   Return to Topic Page
Subject: BMP vs. Bradley: Which is better
wrathofachilles    12/30/2005 3:28:50 PM
Which would you rather have? The Bradley is more effective in combat from what I've read, but is also more expensive and has a high incidence of breakage. Should the US have just copied the BMP rather than design the Bradley? How does the M2A3 compare to the BMP-3M? Can either survive an RPG hit? How does the Bradley's performace in Iraq compare to the BMP's performace in Chechnya?
 
Quote    Reply

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Pages: PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
5thGuards       8/8/2007 8:56:53 PM
Both are top of the league , no doubt...
I would take the bradley though , overall it seems more usefull , especialy with TOW's.

 
Quote    Reply

stbretnco       8/9/2007 12:03:24 AM
Bradley? 2 feet of armor?
 
Quote    Reply

Sabre       8/9/2007 5:52:04 PM

Bradley? 2 feet of armor?

Yup.  And the depleted uranium rounds cause miniature nuclear explosions, destroying half of a city block with each shot.
 
Quote    Reply
PREV  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8



 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics