The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - May 17, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Horent Leader
2.Harpoon 4: Modern Tactical Naval Warfare
3.Empires In Arms

4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge
6.Campaigns of King David
7.Queen of the Celts
8.Danube Front '85
9.Axis and Allies: Guadalcanal
10.Guns of August

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: F-22 Exports
James Dunnigan    3/28/2008 8:34:03 PM

Despite a law forbidding the export of the American F-22 fighter, three nations (Australia, Japan and Israel) are pressuring the U.S. to allow such sales. But the law forbidding the export of the F-22 can be changed. At one time there was a similar prohibition to the export of the F-16.



The F-22 has performance that is far superior to that of any other aircraft in service, and several foreign air forces would like some of these aircraft. The combination of speed, advanced electronics, and stealth technology has created such a decisive advantage that F-22s are often matched up against as many as six F-15s to ensure their pilots face a challenge during training. So why is the F-35, with somewhat lower performance, getting all the export orders?



The first reason is price. The F-22 costs up to $200 million each (without even counting the huge R&D costs). The F-35 costs less than half as much. This is one reason the U.S. is pushing exports of the F-35. This is why many more F-16s were exported, compared to the F-15. Another reason is that the United States does not want the F-22's secrets to fall into the hands of a hostile power. China has acquired at least one F-16 from Pakistan, Russia was able to acquire an F-14 from Iran, and the United States got its hand on a MiG-25 flown in by a Russian defector. There is a chance the F-35 could end up in enemy hands, even with efforts to prevent unauthorized technology transfer, but the technology loss would not be as great as losing an F-22. In any event, the F-35 will outclass a Rafale, F-15E, or Eurofighter, but not the F-22. The U.S. Air Force is using the F-22 as part of a high-end/low-end mix with the F-35, much like the F-15 and F-16 were the combination in the 1990s, only the F-22/F-35 combination will be much harder to detect, and defend against.



But the enormous edge of the F-22, and its usefulness as part of a high/low mix, can be a decisive advantage in many situations. That could cause problems. Israel might use F-22s for an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, and one might be lost. That would be an intelligence disaster of the first magnitude. Japan has had problems in the past in protecting secret U.S. military technology. But the U.S. Air Force sees export sales as a way to keep the F-22 production line active, giving it more time to persuade Congress to allow more to be built for the U.S.

 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

nyetneinnon       3/30/2008 11:10:59 PM
The reason why F-16 was massively sold over the F-15 was because the old tech defined the F-15 as a primary Air to air fighter only.  Most friendly buyers needed both air superiority and strike deterrence, hence the viper.
 
Today however, the air superiority fighter can also be the equal strike platform with readily modified radar/avionics only. 
 
An F-35 strike mission however, would arguably still need F-22 escort, while a pure F-22 mission could theoretically go-it-alone.
 
As far as RAAF goes, imo, they are better going for an F-16XL derivative... or, if they can wait 3-4 years (3-4 years sooner than they can get F-35), then I'd recommend studying a tailless F-15XL type configuration as show below.
 
This recommendation would go for Japan as well.  For economic and performance effect.
 
As for IAF, I'd only support F-22 in the near-term if Syria or Iran was sold Su-35BM or Mig-31BM first.
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy