The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 22, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: How Al Qaeda Lost Pakistan
James Dunnigan    1/26/2008 7:36:02 PM

Al Qaeda would have its hands full if it tries to take over Pakistan. Aside from the fact that the vast majority of the population is not fundamentalist, those who are tend to the be the fiercely tribal types who don't want Arabs telling them what to do. While South Asians and Arabs have traded for thousands of years, they have never developed very warm relations. One reason the Taliban lost power so quickly in Afghanistan in 2001 was because the large al Qaeda presence there. The Arabs, who were the largest component of al Qaeda, exhibited open disdain for the Afghans (who, like most South Asians, are Indo-European).



Al Qaeda's biggest problem is that most of their support is among the Pushtun tribes, and these only comprise 15 percent of the population. They are also the poorest and least educated minority. A unique feature of Pakistan is that it's 165 million people are all minorities, although the Punjabis (44 percent of the population) are the dominant one (not just in numbers, but in education and income as well). Closely allied with the Punjabis are the Sinds (14 percent), and together these two groups pretty much run the country. What these lowland people have not been able to run are the Pushtun and Baluch tribes up in the hills. This has been a problem for thousands of years. The hill tribesmen are fearless warriors, but the lowlanders are more numerous, disciplined and, in the end, more than a match militarily for the tribes. The hill people can threaten and raid, but they can't conquer.



Since Pakistan was created in 1947, the policy towards the tribes was largely one of live-and-let-live. That has fallen apart with the growth of Islamic radicalism (seen as a cure for the corruption and poverty of the nation). This religious fervor calls for more violence throughout the country, with the goal of establishing a religious dictatorship. The Islamic radicalism never caught on, in a big way, among the Punjabis and Sinds. There are plenty of Islamic radicals in the lowlands, but they are split into many factions, and some of the factions (especially Sunni and Shia) are at war with each other. The tribal radicals can make a lot of noise, carry out terrorist attacks and threaten all those who disagree with them (including many Pushtuns and Baluchis). But they can't take over the country. It's been tried before, and this time around the lowlanders have something their ancestors didn't, aircraft and helicopters that can go after the tribesmen in the mountain redoubts. That's already happening, and more and more of the tribal leaders are figuring out the implications. If the lowlanders get really mad, especially if the Taliban and al Qaeda try to set up their own little terrorist kingdom up in the hills, there will be lots of blood.

 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

Zarak       1/26/2008 11:40:09 PM
Hi Mr. Jim Dennigan, I read your article titled "How Al Qaeda Lost Pakistan" dated
January 26, 2008 in the "Strategy Page". Your knowledge about Pakistan seems to be disapointingly poor and highly inaccurate. For example you say, Sindhis are aligned with Punjabis, which is a grass mis-statement. In fact Sindhis are a deprived community living in the rural areas of Sindh and have many times revolted against the excesses of the Punjab.
 
The dominent group in Pakistan are the Punjabis, who dominate miltary and bureaucracy. The second important group is Muhajirs the Urdu-speaking community that inhabit Karachi the largest city in Pakistan and capital city of the Sindh province. The Muhajirs have their own ethnic-based party called MQM and are very averse to the domination of the Punjab. They have been blamed for conspring to make Karachi a separate state to be called Jinnahpoor. Neverthless, before 1971, they were in collaboration with Punjabis against Bangali majority.
 
There is sever political animosity and ethnic clash going on between Sindhis (living in the rural areas of the Sindh proince) and Muhajirs who dominate the main urban centers( of Sindh province). This is because Muhajirs migrated from India during partition of the Subcontinent in 1947 settling in Sindh and thus marginalizing Sindhis, the ancient and original inhabitants of Sindh. Sindhis consider Muhajirs to be usuarpers.
 
Your statement that Pashtuns are least educated is also indicative of your poor knowledge. In fact, after Muhajirs and Punjabis, Pashtuns are the most influential community with significant representation in military and bureaucracy. As for literacy rate is concerned, Muhajirs are at the top, then are the Punjabis, then are the Pashtuns whereas Sindhis, Baluchis, and people of Northern Areas are the least educated.
 
Further, Pashtuns, Sindhis, and Baluchis are simple rural people not having the resources or sophistication to propound such grand ideas like Pan-Islam or Political Islam or Islamic bomb. These are the Muhajirs and Punjabis that are the originators of Islamic ideologies and radical/fundamentalist Islamic movements., including orthodox Deoband/Wahabi (whose originators were Muhajirs) movement, Akhwanul Muslimin (founded by Mualana Maududi, a Muhajir), Tabligh (founded by Mualana Ilyas, a Muhajir), etc. The terrorists you see in Pashtun areas are the legacy of the politics and conflict of the Cold War era in which Islamic Jehad was used to counter communism and Pashtun land was used to fight the war against Russians. Further, the Jehad and Islam have been used by the Punjab-dominated Pakistani state to nuetralize Pashtun nationalist sentiments, install an pro-Pakistani Islamic regime in Kabul, and conquer Kashmir. After 9/11, the terror-fear has been effectively used by Pakistan to squeeze as much from USA as it can (It has divoured 10 billion dollars American aid so far...in fact the more the terror, the more the dollars for Punjab-dominated Pakistan army).
 
It is also absolutely incorrect that the low-landers of Pakistan don't have any relation with Arabs. In fact, the low-lander elite of the Punjab and elite of the Saudi Arab enjoy extremely cordial relations. Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the Punjabi low-land was a guest of the Saudi Arabia while in exile. Musharaf concurs with Saudis in crucial matters. The Islamic atomic bomb of Pakistan had been funded by Arabs like Saudis and Libyans. And there are strong rumours that Pakistan shares the ownership of the bomb with Saudis. Further, the prolifiration of the weapons of mass destruction had been carried out by the low-landers (Abdul Qadir Khan, a Muhajir as well as many Punjabi generals).
 
I sometimes feel sorry that Western writers have such poor knowledge about Pakistan and are usually decieved/made gullible by the cunning low-landers of Pakistan.           

 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy