The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - November 22, 2008

Dunnigan's and Bay's Latest

Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: What Really Sinks Warships
James Dunnigan    12/3/2004 8:16:05 AM

The U.S. Navy has had twenty ships damaged in combat since World War II. Four of
them were sunk. For sixteen of those ships, it was naval mines that did the
damage Another three were hit by enemy aircraft, and one was hit by a suicide
boat bomb. Ten of those attacks, all from naval mines, were during the Korean
war, which is where the four sinkings took place. Three of the four Vietnam war
attacks were mines (the other was a destroyer hit by a bomb from a North Vietnam
MiG-17). During the 1967 Arab Israeli war, an American intelligence gathering
ship was attacked by Israeli aircraft (and small warships as well). During the
1980-87 Iran-Iraq war, one American ship got hit by an Iranian mine, another by
an Iraqi aircraft firing a missile. During the 1991 Iraq war, two ships were hit
by mines, and in 2000, an al Qaeda suicide bomber detonated a small boat load of
explosives next to a destroyer.

It?s pretty obvious what the most lethal
weapon is; it?s mines. But the navy has consistently shortchanged the building
of mine clearing ships, aircraft and equipment. Other countries, particularly in
Europe, have taken the lead in developing mine clearing technology. In the
1990s, the United States began to invest more money in mine clearing, but
dealing with mines is still considered a secondary issue. This despite the
danger mines have been, and continue to be. All potential naval opponents of the
United States have stocked up on mines. Apparently those who might have to fight
the United States Navy have noticed what the most successful weapon to use
against American ships is. While mines are largely a defensive weapon, it is a
very effective one. And mines can be used offensively as well, if you can get
them to places where enemy ships have to operate. Even American
counter-terrorist efforts recognize this, at least to the extent that the severe
impact of a few naval mines in American ports would have on the economy is
recognized. The U.S. Navy may not pay a lot of attention to mines, but their
enemies certainly are.

 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

gf0012-aust    What Really Sinks Warships   12/3/2004 8:51:53 AM
The recent Underwater Defence Technology Conference held in Hawai'i actually ran this topic as a session. In dollar terms the US suffered over $150m worth of damage via less than $100k in sea mines. One of those mines was of WW1 design vintage. The USN (and allies) is/are actually paying a lot of attention to the issue. The new generation mines coming out of the UK and Europe are quantum leaps in technological capability over mines that were typically in use even 5 years ago. Minewarfare is definitely on the radar screen.
 
Quote    Reply

CDR Salamander    RE:What Really Sinks Warships   12/3/2004 3:34:35 PM
You speak with big medicine. Ask the Gator Navy what they think of mines....BOO!
 
Quote    Reply

battar    What used to sink warships   12/4/2004 3:32:56 PM
Note that the last ship in the list was damaged by a suicide bomber in a speedboat. This is the face of modern warfare and the danger facing most Navy's in combat zones (aside from special forces). So the emphasis in defensive equipment should be electro-optical and high resolution radar sensing devices and close- in weapons like the Phalanx and Raphael's Typhoon.
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust    What used to sink warships   12/4/2004 11:57:19 PM
One could argue that the principle cause for threat is inflexible or inappropriate operating procedures in an area where the threat matrix warranted a higher state of alert. In the majority of cases these incidents could have been avoided or reduced in severity.
 
Quote    Reply

radio    RE:What used to sink warships   12/18/2004 4:56:54 AM
Any ship can be a minesweeper....once. I would have to agree that a definate focus of ship defense should be 'at the waterline'.
 
Quote    Reply

blacksmith    RE:What used to sink warships   12/19/2004 12:02:27 PM
And how does the threat from mines and torpedoes explain the money the Navy is going to spend to build "stealth ships" like the DD(X).
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy