The Strategypage is a comprehensive summary of military news and affairs.
 News As History - October 13, 2008

Advertisement


Advertisement



New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Squad Battles: Winter War
2.Silent War
3.Manoeuvre
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

Online Giving

Utah SEO Firm

Xango

Smiley Gifts for Babies

Military History | How To Make War | Wars Around the World Rules of Use
Dirty Little Secrets Discussion Board
Sign In   Return to Topic Page
Subject: No Reward for the Temporary Infantry
Doug Mohney    10/31/2004 11:07:55 PM

Soldiers retrained and serving temporarily as infantry in Iraq cannot be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) under the current rules, despite the fact that they are fighting as infantry for more than the 30 days required to qualify for the CIB. The Army is now debating who should qualify for the award,  since thousands of soldiers, including tankers, engineers, and artillerymen, have been retrained to perform as infantry in Iraq. Even some infantry company commanders are in favor of expanding the award to include non-infantry troops serving as infantry. During the Vietnam war, exceptions were made.

Currently, the CIB is only awarded to Army infantry or special forces personnel  who has been personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or special forces duty in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Soldiers who aren't infantry or special forces MOS (military occupation specialty, or job code) can't get the CIB, regardless of how well they perform under enemy fire. The commander of the 1st Cavalry Division has called for an "exception of policy" to allow non-infantry units to receive the CIB. Army brass have formed a task force to examine the issue, taking into the account the "changing name of combat." Traditionalists are reluctant to expand the criteria for awarding the badge because they are afraid it will dilute the award. 

The CIB was created in 1943 to recognize that the infantry "continually operate under the worst conditions" and sustain "the most casualties" with the least recognition. From World War II through Vietnam, four out of five combat deaths were sustained by infantrymen. However, Iraq is a different war with more casualties sustained by non-infantry in fighting to date. In addition, the armor-heavy Army needed more infantry to secure Iraq and entire companies traded in their tanks for Humvees. "Retreads" from other MOSes have seen intense close-quarters fighting in Iraqi cities and continue to rack up more than their share of Purple Hearts and other awards for merit and courage.

 
Quote    Reply
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

smitty237    RE:No Reward for the Temporary Infantry   11/3/2004 2:52:16 AM
There is another dimension to this controversy. If the CIB were awarded to non-infantry soldiers you could conceivably see more than a few female soldiers eligible for the award. I personally know of at least one female assigned to an MP unit that saw considerable action in Iraq. She was even wounded by an improvised explosive device. If the Army awards male soldiers in certain non-infantry units the CIB but does not award female soldiers in the same units the award, there could be considerable controversy in the States, particularly among the feminist groups. Awarding females the CIB will weaken the Army's policy of not allowing women in combat units. The Army would probably much rather stick to its guns and not issue the CIB to non-infantry units than face this dilemma.
 
Quote    Reply

RuckN    RE:No Reward for the Temporary Infantry   1/25/2005 8:26:40 AM
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, you probably ought to treat it like a duck. When they take the FA, or ADA troops and turn them into infantry units, they ought to treat them like infantry units with regard to the award of the CIB.
 
Quote    Reply

Old Grunt    RE:No Reward for the Temporary Infantry   1/25/2005 4:37:22 PM
First, there is not now, nor has there ever been, a 30 day requirement for an INFANTRYMAN to qualify for the award of the CIB. Prior to 1973 there was a requirement for a non-infantry branched officer who was placed in command of an infantry unit to be in command for at least 30 days before he was eligible for the award. There is also a HUGE difference between those who volunteer from the beginning to accept the hardship and risk of closing with the enemy and those who are conducting infantry-like operations out of necessity or on order. The operations being conducted by these "retreads" as you call them are nothing more than what the combat MP's have traditionally performed. Are they dangerous? Yes. Are they continuous operations? Definitely not. When these "temporary infantry" soldiers are used routinely in major assaults and high-risk operations, then there can be a discussion about the CIB.
 
Quote    Reply

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2008StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy