Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Weapons: Newer Isn't Always Better
   Next Article → AIR TRANSPORTATION: Falling Apart In Russia
November 5, 2009: The U.S. Army has just ordered another 6,500 Mk19 40mm grenade launchers. At one point, the U.S. sought to slowly replace its 1960s era Mk19 with a lighter and more effective Mk47 model. The replacement program moved slowly, because the Mk19, for all its simplicity, got the job done. While several thousand Mk47s have been bought, the army is in the midst of buying nearly 20,000 new Mk19s.

The Mk47 is lighter (40 pounds) than the 77 pound Mk19. It is a little more compact, and has the electronic sighting and arming system which enables the gunner to determine the distance of the target (with a laser range finder), then push a button to have the weapon electronically program each shell, just before it is fired, for the number of seconds until the shell will explode, at the proper range from the gun, and above the enemy troops. If the time fuze does not work, the shell explodes when it hits something.

Both these 40mm weapons have a max range of 2,000 meters (and an effective range of about 1,500 meters). The Mk19 weapon, with a tripod, weigh 136 pounds, while each 48 round magazine weighs 60 pounds. The Mk19 effective rate of fire is about one round per second, and is usually fired in short (a few rounds) bursts of these 19 ounce grenades (which kill or incapacitate most people with six meters of the explosion and can wound at twice that). The Mk19 is more complex than your usual machine-gun, expensive (about $20,000 each) and jams more frequently (once every thousand rounds, compared to once every 10,000 rounds for the M2 12.7mm machine-gun.). But it is reliable enough to remain popular and in demand. The lighter Mk47 costs about 50 percent more, and is about as reliable as the Mk19.

While SOCOM has been an enthusiastic user of the Mk47, that is probably because they put a premium on weight (as their troops often go deep and travel light.) The Mk47 itself is much lighter, and its electronic aiming system enables a skilled user to get the job done using less ammo. But for most troops, the Mk19 (usually mounted on a vehicle) does what needs to be done. Newer isn’t always better, at least not for everyone.

The U.S. Navy developed the Mk19 in the 1970s, for use on river and coastal patrol boats. The army adopted the weapon in the early 1980s, but it wasn't until the 1991 Gulf War that the Mk19 saw much action. Or at least some action. Users noted that the Mk19 was very effective out in the open, not so much in urban areas. In 2003, when the army and marines encountered much more combat out in the open, they found the Mk19 to be very valuable, more so than machine-guns.

What really makes the Mk47 different is the Mk285 40mm shells, each equipped with a time fuze. Normally only used in larger artillery shells, a time fuze in 40mm grenades makes it easier to get at enemy troops on roof tops or behind walls. These shells, which cost $213 each, can only be used with the Mk47. This first troops to get the Mk47 were U.S. NAVY SEALS, and other SOCOM troops.

Next Article → AIR TRANSPORTATION: Falling Apart In Russia
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Gerry       11/6/2009 8:04:54 PM
To me, it seems obvious why SO troops would prefer the MK47. Light and precise.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       11/7/2009 5:37:12 AM
It's probably the old production vs. demand problem.  The MK47 is back ordered, so you have to settle for a MK19 or do without.
 
Quote    Reply