Article Archive: Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Weapons: The First Laser Gun Was Too Cruel To Use
   Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Anti-Submarine Warfare In The Eastern Pacific

September 21, 2008: This is how the U.S. Army developed the first combat laser in the 1960s and 70s, but refused to deploy it because it was considered too cruel. It all started with the Advanced Propulsion Technology Branch of the Propulsion Directorate in the Army Missile Command at Redstone Arsenal in the 1960's. Their mission was the development of advanced propulsion concepts such as liquid monopropellants, bipropellants, hybrids, air breathing etc. for application to Army missiles. 

One morning, after a staff meeting with the Generals, Dr. Walter Wharton, our supervisor, announced, "Men I've got a new and unusual project for you. It's not propulsion, but needs all the technology and skills of propulsion. Here's the pitch: Over the past two years, one of our Army contractors has failed to demonstrate chemical lasing in a hardware device. The General asked us to take over the effort. And, if we achieved a satisfactory demonstration of the chemical laser we would be the nucleus of a new laboratory and weapons effort. I told the General the problem was a natural fit to our skills. With the chemists, physicists, engineers and technicians on our staff and our background in hardware development and testing we could do the job expeditiously."

The basic problem with using a laser as a weapon is power. A laser is focused light energy, being sent from the laser to the target in a short burst. Using batteries or generators and capacitors are too heavy for this to be practical. But the right combination of chemicals can provide the needed energy, at least in theory. The solution is a bit more complex.

Dr. Wharton led us in the analysis and evaluation of the contractor's effort and data. Their device used gaseous hydrogen and gaseous fluorine. The attempt at lasing was through the kinetic reaction states in the laser cavity to form the end product HF. Dr. Wharton, a skilled chemist, immediately determined the critical issue. To allow the intermediate activated molecules the time and space to lase to ground states in the laser cavity, would require supersonic injection by the mixing nozzles, and very low cavity pressure. That environment would slow down the kinetics and stretch out the reaction zone allowing the species to lase.

Wharton designated me ( Joe Connaughton, a chemical engineer) as team leader for  chemist Tony Duncan, laser device operator, physicist Bill Friday, cavity optics and power, and mechanical engineer, Ben Wilson facility design and development. We had top priority in obtaining hardware, shop and other support services. In a matter of weeks we had the device set up and ready for operation. The big day came when we were ready to test. Dr. Wharton said, "Get that machine cranked up and don't stop till you get it to lasing. I'll be in the office, so call me if you have any problems or when it starts lasing."

We spent most of the day adjusting the flow of the gases, and setting our liquid nitrogen trap and pumping speed. But near the end of the day, Bill Friday held a piece of strip recorder paper three feet from the cavity optics and yelled, "Hey! Look guys at me burn holes in this paper by that invisible laser beam!" We probably didn't project more than a hundred watts of power but it worked. We had an operating HF chemical laser, and we were in business. The next day was show time, which included all day demonstrations to various levels of management including the Commanding General.

We were off and running to build a ten kilowatt HF laser that would define the operating parameters for scale up to weapon grade hardware. It was a large modular boilerplate device designed for research studies. Calorimetric cavity mirrors for precise power measurements and ports for optical flow field visualization were included. The modular design allowed the evaluation and development of laser components to advance the technology of high-energy lasers.

The group quickly expanded to include PhD level scientists, who began to study all aspects of the chemical laser and extrapolate data to weapon system needs. Dr. Barry Allen, with contractor support, researched solid sources for the reactants. He found hydrides and fluorides that had reactant densities greater than the cryogenics were appropriate. He also worked on the successful development of chemical pumps that would replace the huge vacuum blow down system required to pump the boilerplate laser.

Drs. Kerry Patterson and Miles Holloman were analyst who developed computer models that helped guide the experiments. They also performed significant optical flow visualization measurements that showed the deleterious effects of large boundary layers in mixing nozzles and shock structures in the laser cavity (refs. 2 & 3).

Within the next decade we had fully characterized and optimized the chemical laser for scale up to an army mobile weapon system. One major problem we were unable to solve was getting lethal power onto a mobile vehicle. We were, however, able to propose a mobile broad beam laser battlefield weapon that could destroy battlefield and missile sensors. It would also burn out the eyeballs of enemy foot soldiers.

Dr. Wharton presented our mobile battlefield laser concept (including supporting design data) to several layers of army brass. He was surprised to learn that it was turned down. The weapon was quite feasible, with a solid development schedule. Amazingly, the generals turned it down on the basis that it was too cruel to use in battle, because it would burn out foot soldiers eyes. Apparently, they considered it to be in the same weapon class as poison gas.

The upshot of this initial decade or more of chemical laser effort by the Army is that the program was cancelled and the unique laser laboratory and test facility dismantled. The chemical laser group of specialists was disseminated into other missile research and development units. At the time of the termination of the chemical laser program, an Army Missile Command reduction in force also took place. The Army downgraded many chemical laser specialists, because they were no longer in the mainstream of the propulsion effort.

Although this early Army chemical lasers effort died at the time, the results were a significant contribution to the Air Forces' airborne laser and fixed installation lasers later developed by the armed services. -- Joseph Connaughton

Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Anti-Submarine Warfare In The Eastern Pacific

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
WarNerd       9/21/2008 1:50:28 PM
EXCELLENT!  Thank you for this piece of history. 
I checked the Redstone Arsenal website and found no references the project in their official history site.
Do you know of any good sources for historical information on other early and canceled projects?
Quote    Reply

Hurlbee36       9/22/2008 12:30:48 AM
When it come down to survival, it is comforting to know that brilliant minds (such as Mr Connaughton's) are making the effort for those who actually have feet on the ground and not up on a desk (the rule makers).  The brick wall (too cruel for use in warfare) was the Geneva Protocol.  It's this same mindset that says a hollow point 5.56mm round causes unnecessary suffering.  We are, after all, supposed to wound the enemy, transport them to a medical facility for treatment, and finally to a legal firm where they can sue us.
Quote    Reply

Softwar    Dazzler   9/22/2008 8:57:33 AM
Legally speaking - the use of dazzler lasers (designed to destroy the eyesight of soldiers) is banned under the UN.  The US complained to the former Soviet Union about Navy aviatiors who were illuminated by a Russian warship using a laser.
However, in practice the dazzler concept has made it to the battlefield.  There were rumors that the Brits used dazzlers against the Argentine pilots during the Falklands war.  China has already deployed the ZM-87 laser - both in an infantry mounted version and on top of some of its tanks.  The ZM-87 is supposed to destroy electro-optical designators used to guide anti-tank missiles - but it was billed as also being able to blind enemy soldiers.
Quote    Reply

Joe C.    First laser gun too cruel   9/24/2008 10:44:30 AM
Most of the chemical laser work at Redstone Arsenal at that time was classified confidential with some aspects secret. Of course, all of the confidential effort has been declassified, but I'm not aware of the declassification status of the secret. In my visit to the RSIC (Redstone Scientific Information Center) to review relevant reports, I was told that although the reports have been declassified that didn't neccessarily mean they had received public release. The following reports which are the basis of my article have been released to the public.


1.    Wilson, Ben F. and Joseph W. Connaughton, A Versatile Facility for Chemical Laser Research and Development, Army High Energy Laser Directorate, U.S. Army Missile Research, Development and Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama 35809, September 1975, Technical Report RH-76-4.


2.    Jones, R.W., L.B. Thorn, and K.E. Patterson, Flow Visualization in a Chemical Laser Cavity by Pulsed Laser Holography, Propulsion Directorate, U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 20June1975, Technical Report RK-75-9.


3.    Patterson, Grant T., Asst. Professor The University of Tennessee Space Inst., Tullahoma, Tenn., Observations of the Fluid Mechanical Phenomena Associated With Chemical Laser Nozzles, Tech Contract Monitor Kerry E. Patterson, Propulsion Directorate, U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Laboratory, U.S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 1975, Technical Report RK-75-1.
Joseph Connaughton
Quote    Reply