Article Archive: Current 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Special Operations: Walking Away From A Billion Dollar Boondoggle
   Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Barak Moves Forward

July 30, 2009: U.S. SOCOM (Special Operations Command) has abandoned ASDS (Advanced Seal Delivery Systems, a small sub for getting SEALs to the beach), after it discovered that recent fire damage would cost $237 million, and take three years, to repair. Last November, the sole ASDS caught fire, and burned for six hours. SOCOM was reluctant to repair the vessel, and now has decided to just walk away. Originally, the entire program (including six ASDS) was to have cost $527 million, but it ended up costing nearly twice that to only produce one.

While a nice piece of engineering, each ASDS would have cost over $300 million. The U.S. Navy also spent $47 million building a base in Hawaii for the ASDS fleet. There, and in the Persian Gulf, the first ASDS production boat underwent testing for three years, before being declared ready for service in 2004. But problems kept cropping up, until the production of the other five was cancelled in 2006. After a decade of development, the ASDS had too many technical problems. Only the first one remained, and it sort of worked, until it caught fire.

Apparently there was not a big demand for something like the ASDS, as there was no immediate request for a replacement design. But now, another attempt is going to be made to develop a similar vessel. The U.S. Navy, and the British Royal Navy, both still need a delivery vehicle for their combat swimmers. Both nations are still using the Mk 8, which is a World War II era design that is basically a reusable torpedo that divers in scuba gear hang on to as they are taken to shore.

Thus three years after admitting defeat in developing the ASDS, another attempt is going to be made. The new SWCS (Shallow Water Combat Submersible) will be a smaller (30 feet long, carrying six SEALs) version of the ASDS (which was a 65 foot long, 60 ton mini-submarine.) Like the ASDS, the SWCS will be battery powered and with a crew of two. The larger ASDS could carry up to 14 passengers (fewer if a lot of equipment is being brought along, the usual number of passengers is expected to be eight.) With a max range of 200 kilometers, top speed of 14 kilometers an hour and max diving depth of 200 feet (65 meters), the ASDS operates from one of the seven U.S. nuclear submarine equipped to carry it on its deck, and several British boats that will be similarly equipped. Both minisubs were equipped with passive and active SONAR, radar and an electronic periscope (that uses a video camera, not the traditional optics.) The SWCS will have a range of 160 kilometers and be able to dive to 300 feet (95 meters). Both navies want the SWCS, which will recycle ASDS technology that worked, and replace the stuff that didn't. Thus the current plan is to have the SWCS in service within four years.

 

Next Article → SURFACE FORCES : Barak Moves Forward
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
Whispering Death       7/30/2009 5:41:57 AM
Such an incredible waste of money.

Alaska's bridge to nowhere was to only cost $320 million.
 
Quote    Reply

elewis121    Walking Away From A Billion Dollar Boondoggle   7/30/2009 2:43:56 PM
Lets see, I left Martin Marietta in 1992 and we had just lost ASDS to Westinghouse.  The last time I saw pictures of the ASDS, it reminded me a little of some of the drug (semi) subs coming out of South America. Maybe there is a balance that could be struck between the two.
 
Quote    Reply

Gerry       7/30/2009 8:57:36 PM

Can be dropped 160 k off the coast (110 miles), travels at 14 K top speed (10mph, an 11 hour one way trip) Can't think of many uses for such an extreme machine. I'm sure someone can come up with a few uses, such as shallow coastlines in the gulf region etc. There must be less expensive ways to get in and get out under the radar. Half a billion dollars could buy a lot of disposable subs used from 20 miles out with a GPS unit and fish finder.

 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       7/31/2009 5:45:23 AM

Can be dropped 160 k off the coast (110 miles), travels at 14 K top speed (10mph, an 11 hour one way trip) Can't think of many uses for such an extreme machine. I'm sure someone can come up with a few uses, such as shallow coastlines in the gulf region etc. There must be less expensive ways to get in and get out under the radar. Half a billion dollars could buy a lot of disposable subs used from 20 miles out with a GPS unit and fish finder.

Drop it 5 miles offshore and it could swim up to 50 miles up a river or estuary and return, bypassing any coastal defenses.  Or a greater distance for a one way trip.  Many important harbors are not located on the coast, but at considerable distance up river.
 
 
Quote    Reply

GLaw    Take a lesson from the Narco subs   8/1/2009 4:41:22 PM
Those cost about 1 million dollars each.
 
Yes.  They have less capabilities.  But they cost less than 1 percent of the cost of these monstrosities.
 
Quote    Reply