Article Archive: Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Sea Transportation: The Shipbuilding Behemoths Of the East
   Next Article → LIBYA: Raiders Of The Lost Cause
May 31, 2011: China continues to expand its share of worldwide shipbuilding, and it remains the top builder on the planet. Last year, Chinese shipyards built 43 percent of the world's merchant shipping (in terms of tonnage). In addition, Chinese shipyards received 54 percent of new orders. It was only two years ago, sooner than anyone expected, that China surpassed South Korea as the world's largest shipbuilder. In late 2009, Chinese yards had orders for 54.96 million CGT of ships, compared to 53.63 million CGT for South Korea. Thus China has 34.7 percent of the world market. In 2000, South Korea took the lead from Japan by having the largest share of the world shipbuilding market.

CGT stands for Compensated Gross Tons. This is a new standard for measuring shipyard effort. Gross tons is a measure of the volume within a ship, which CGT adds adjustments for the complexity of the ship design. Thus a chemical tanker would end up with a value four times that of a container ship. China is producing far more ships, in terms of tonnage of steel and internal volume, than South Korea, mainly because a much larger portion of Chinese ships are simple designs. South Korea has, over the years, pioneered the design, and construction, of more complex ships (chemical, and Liquid Natural gas carriers.) Note that deadweight tons measure the actual weight of everything carried in the ship, including supplies, miscellaneous equipment, fuel, and even crew, expressed in long tons: As a rule for every 1,500 deadweight tons a cargo ship could carry about 1,775 measurement tons. Warship tonnage is measured differently, in terms of "displacement tons." Each 35 cubic feet of sea water displaced by the vessel is a "displacement ton." As that volume of sea water actually weighs approximately one long ton, displacement gives a rough indication of the actual weight of the vessel.

China has invested much money and effort into expanding its merchant shipbuilding industry, as a way to improve its warship building capability. Five years ago, China produced about a quarter of the world's merchant shipping, while South Korea was in first place, producing about a third. It was then believed that China would take first place in the next 5-10 years.

The big thing holding China back in the warship building area has been the shortage of skilled personnel. By encouraging merchant shipbuilding, the government creates experienced ship builders for the more complex task of building warships. In most cases, merchant ships are larger than warships, and much less complex. For example, a common type of merchant ship is the VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrier) of 300,000 deadweight tons (DWT) . This is the largest size tanker that can use the Straits of Malacca to carry oil from the Persian Gulf to East Asia. These ships haul over two million barrels (about 290,000 tons) of oil per trip. These ships are larger than the biggest American aircraft carriers (like the Nimitz class, that are 110,000 tons displacement, and nearly 354 meters/1,100 feet long.)

The major difference between merchant vessels and warships is what equipment they have. Merchant ships are quite basic and plain. A 300,000 DWT VLCC is about the same size as a Nimitz class carrier, but costs much less to build ($130 million for the VLCC, versus over $4 billion for the carrier). Actually, it costs more to run a carrier for one year, than the VLCC costs to build. Part of that has to do with crew size, with the carrier having a hundred sailors for everyone needed to run the VLCC.

By building all those merchant vessels, China has acquired the ability to build the basic warship hull. Where it has big problems is in creating the complex electronics, mechanical systems and weapons needed to make a warship work. China is making progress there as well, but not nearly as much as it has in the ship building area.

China grabbed the lead in market share for commercial shipping partly because it became more difficult for South Korean builders to expand. There were more restrictions on land use in South Korea, in addition to higher labor costs. South Korean builders, seeing that they could not match the expansion of Chinese ship yards, expended more effort on building more complex, and expensive, ships. Japan was following a similar path when it lost the lead to South Korea a decade ago. China also gained more market share by offering generous loan terms to foreign buyers of Chinese ships, and cheap loans for their own shipbuilders.

 

Next Article → LIBYA: Raiders Of The Lost Cause
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
YelliChink       5/31/2011 2:07:55 PM
How about let's look at the figure of American commercial  shipbuilding? Were it not be Jones Act, US commercial shipbuilding may have gone completely belly-up years ago.
 
Quote    Reply

Tucci78    Governments meddling in the marketplace   5/31/2011 11:21:31 PM

How about let's look at the figure of American commercial  shipbuilding? Were it not be Jones Act, US commercial shipbuilding may have gone completely belly-up years ago.

The problem here is that when we discuss Communist China, we're not speaking of private enterprise in the commercial shipbuilding field but rather about "companies" which are nothing more than organs of the civil government. The gerontocracy in Beijing is perfectly willing to starve and impoverish their own domestic victims in order to gain advantage in sales to international customers, ergo.... 
 
There is no way that private sector actors in this marketplace can compete with rivals who are funded and otherwise backed by murdering thugs, and chasing the Chinese down this rat hole by government "spread the wealth around" subsidization is a recipe for economic disaster. 
 
Remember the words of writer P.J. O'Rourke: "When a government controls both the economic power of individuals and the coercive power of the state ... This violates a fundamental rule of happy living: Never let the people with all the money and the people with all the guns be the same people."
 
Quote    Reply

Thomas    Overcapacity   6/5/2011 2:00:18 AM
For starters, there is much overcapacity in commercial shipping.
Today capacity is regulated by the throttle. Emma Mærsk runs 24 knots, but at the present sails at about 12.
 
At bit to much weight on the yards: Only about 30% of the cost of a commercial ship goes to the yard: The rest is suppliers - pumps, electrical motors and so on.
 
Quote    Reply