Article Archive: Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Sea Transportation: Shoot On Sight, Keep Shooting
   Next Article → ATTRITION: Cutting The RAF Pipeline
February 21, 2011: As Somali pirates move farther from the coast (using stolen fishing vessels as mother ships), most shipping in the Indian Ocean is at risk of attack. In response, more ships are putting armed guards on board, even though this practice risks running into laws barring firearms on merchant ships entering their ports or territorial waters. Recently, the ICS (International Chamber of Shipping), a trade organization representing 80 percent of all shipping companies, urged its members to put armed guards on ships moving through pirate infested waters. This now includes most of the Indian Ocean between India and Africa. There are problems with this, beyond gun restrictions. Some countries forbid ships flying their flag from carrying armed guards.

None of this has stopped several private security companies from offering armed guards for ships. The security companies operate from countries that allow them (sometimes after payment of bribes) to have military grade weapons. The security teams sometimes travel unarmed to a port where they can pick up their weapons, and board the ship they are guarding. That works because some shipping companies are carrying rifles and machine-guns on board, but keeping them hidden from port and cargo inspectors. Large merchant ships have lots of places to hide things like a dozen rifles and pistols and a few thousands rounds of ammo. Other security companies will send out a small ship with the armed men on board, and transfer them to the merchant ship in international waters. In short, no one wants to talk openly about how this security business operates. But there's a growing demand, and no shortage of security companies willing to fill the need. This makes lawyers for shipping companies nervous, because of the risk of innocent fishermen getting shot if they approach a guarded ship way that makes the merchant crew nervous. One thing leads to another and someone who isn't a pirate gets shot. Lawsuits follow, and the shipping company has another pirate-related problem. But the shipping companies have reached the point where they would rather handle these lawsuits than more ransom negotiations with pirates.

 

Next Article → ATTRITION: Cutting The RAF Pipeline
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
heraldabc    Bwahahahahah   2/22/2011 11:48:08 AM
Its a private joke, but I remember the fierce arguments about arming merchant ships and blowing Somali fishermen out of the water when sighted.on Strategypage.
 
 
None of this has stopped several private security companies from offering armed guards for ships. The security companies operate from countries that allow them (sometimes after payment of bribes) to have military grade weapons. The security teams sometimes travel unarmed to a port where they can pick up their weapons, and board the ship they are guarding. That works because some shipping companies are carrying rifles and machine-guns on board, but keeping them hidden from port and cargo inspectors. Large merchant ships have lots of places to hide things like a dozen rifles and pistols and a few thousands rounds of ammo. Other security companies will send out a small ship with the armed men on board, and transfer them to the merchant ship in international waters. In short, no one wants to talk openly about how this security business operates. But there's a growing demand, and no shortage of security companies willing to fill the need. This makes lawyers for shipping companies nervous, because of the risk of innocent fishermen getting shot if they approach a guarded ship way that makes the merchant crew nervous. One thing leads to another and someone who isn't a pirate gets shot. Lawsuits follow, and the shipping company has another pirate-related problem. But the shipping companies have reached the point where they would rather handle these lawsuits than more ransom negotiations with pirates. 
 
Seems that I was mostly right  about that argument.
 
Herald
.       
 
Quote    Reply

gf0012-aust       2/22/2011 3:29:15 PM

Seems that I was mostly right  about that argument.
Herald

this is almost content duplication of what I wrote 18 months ago on a number of other forums
the only thing that is missing is that some of the vessels using PMS sometimes tow their weapons in waterproof bags over the side and suspend them from fishing lines (much like what some of the drug runners do with their commerce)
 
the comments about offshore reloading in international waters is exactly what I've stated 18 months ago. the issue about nationa state common law issues about carriage is also exactly what I stated 18 months ago.
 
IIRC I even stated how many companies were visible, where they were based and what kinds of operators they were recruiting.. (ex Ghurkas, ex RM's ex Coasties or anyone ex-mil/para-mil with VBSS experience)

 
Quote    Reply