Article Archive: Current 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics
Sea Transportation: Somali Pirates On A Roll Again
   Next Article → INDIA-PAKISTAN: Coming Out Swinging In Swat

February 2, 2009: When foreign warships began to heavily patrol the Gulf of Aden in late 2008, the Somali pirates found their operations disrupted. While 42 ships were taken in 2008, the trend turned against the pirates as more warships entered the area. But the pirates appear to be adjusting their tactics in response to all those warships. January began well enough, with far fewer attacks, and no ships seized. But by the end of the month, three ships were taken, and a total of fifteen attacks for the month.

For all of 2008, there were 115 attacks on ships in the Gulf of Aden (where over 80 percent of the attacks occurred off the Somali coast last year.) Pirates were successful with 46 of these attacks, most of them in the last five months of the year. During the first seven months, there were only 24 attacks, but ten of them (42 percent) succeeded. Then things got worse. In August there were ten attacks, seven of them successful. In September, there were twenty attacks, nine of them successful. In October, there were 18 attacks, five successful. November had 27 attacks, 11 successful. In December, the impact of protective measures (by the ships, and the arrival of over a dozen warships into the area) saw attacks decline to 16, with only four successful.

By the end of 2008, merchant ships had adapted. This included posting more lookouts, moving at higher speed, and often travelling in convoys through the Gulf of Aden, escorted by a warship. The international anti-piracy patrol (now called Task Force 151) heavily patrols a corridor through the Gulf of Aden, which has rushed to the scene of over half a dozen attacks and driven off the pirates. The fourteen nations with warships there, all have different rules for handing pirates. Most of the warships are allowed to kill the pirates, but most are forbidden from taking pirates prisoner (except temporarily, before releasing the thugs without their weapons). Even the United States Navy had to practice "catch and release" until recently,  when the U.S. government made arrangements to have Kenya prosecute any pirates captured.

The pirates have also adapted, and apparently carefully watch the warships, and cooperate to detect merchant ships that are far enough from warships to allow for a successful attack. It's all about timing. Most of these attacks failed because a warship was able to get an armed helicopter on the scene before the pirates were able to get aboard the merchant ship. Once the pirates are on board, and able to take the crew prisoner, it's almost impossible to get them off. In the last two years, there have only been two cases where the crew successfully fought back. That, and the presence of an armed helicopter or warship, was enough to drive away the pirates, or get them killed or captured. But most merchant sailors are advised to not resist, and most of them don't.

There are only guesstimates on the amount of ransom paid in 2008. Over thirty ships were released in 2008, and the highest known ransom was $3 million. Most 2008 ransoms appear to be closer to a million dollars, with several (for smaller ships) being less than that. So the ransom total is probably in the range $30-50 million for all of Somalia.

Next Article → INDIA-PAKISTAN: Coming Out Swinging In Swat
  

Show Only Poster Name and Title     Newest to Oldest
EvanH       2/2/2009 2:39:12 PM
It sure would be nice if the Navy would take some old freighters, arm them, and set them up like the "Q" ships of WWII, to bait the pirates into attacking (and then getting killed.) 
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       2/2/2009 3:13:43 PM

It sure would be nice if the Navy would take some old freighters, arm them, and set them up like the "Q" ships of WWII, to bait the pirates into attacking (and then getting killed.) 
I was thinking exactly the same, but the navies involved seem to be reluctant to take a hard line against pirates. But, this situation can't go on forever......
 
DG
 
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa    Remember Stephen Decatur?   2/2/2009 6:45:54 PM
I don't think it's the Navies involved that are reluctant to take a hard line, it's the squeamish Western politicians to whom they report and from whom they must take their orders.  And the squeamish politicians are afraid of The Usual Suspects-the wretched "human rights" lawyers and activists who'd scream bloody murder and start lawfare attacks, based on the pirates' "human rights" if the Western warships were to sink pirate ships and attack pirate port havens.
 
Ship owners and their honest working seamen don't have property rights or human rights but pirates; scum of the earth terrorists-at-sea, do.
 
One of the things we ought to bring back from the days of sail: summary execution of captured pirates, hanged from the proverbial yardarm by a good length of rope.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       2/3/2009 1:58:32 AM

I don't think it's the Navies involved that are reluctant to take a hard line, it's the squeamish Western politicians to whom they report and from whom they must take their orders.  And the squeamish politicians are afraid of The Usual Suspects-the wretched "human rights" lawyers and activists who'd scream bloody murder and start lawfare attacks, based on the pirates' "human rights" if the Western warships were to sink pirate ships and attack pirate port havens.

Actually, the "human rights" lawyers have gotten the laws so messed up that any captured pirate brought back to an EU nation automatically is reclassified as a "economic refugee".  So any ships they send either have 'shoot to kill' orders or are just there for show.
 
Quote    Reply

WarNerd       2/3/2009 4:06:02 AM

It sure would be nice if the Navy would take some old freighters, arm them, and set them up like the "Q" ships of WWII, to bait the pirates into attacking (and then getting killed.) 

Historically, Q ships have never been an effective tactic, and would probably be even less effective now.  The problem is that once the ship is identified then it ceases to be effective.  In a world of the internet and cell phone cameras, and global news services, that won't take long, maybe not even long enough to nail one pirate.
 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       2/3/2009 6:58:15 AM



It sure would be nice if the Navy would take some old freighters, arm them, and set them up like the "Q" ships of WWII, to bait the pirates into attacking (and then getting killed.) 




Historically, Q ships have never been an effective tactic, and would probably be even less effective now.  The problem is that once the ship is identified then it ceases to be effective.  In a world of the internet and cell phone cameras, and global news services, that won't take long, maybe not even long enough to nail one pirate.

The very existence of Q ships would make pirates think twice.
 
It would be relatively easy to adapt another ship. Two 0.5 inch machine guns (one for each side of the ship) and people ready to operate them would be enough. Perhaps an anti-material sniper rifle for longer ranges, like South African NTW,  too. Pirates operate small unarmored boats that can't take much damage.

They don't even need to shot anyone directly, sinking the boats would be enough. Those waters are full of sharks, the lucky ones would be those who die from bullet wounds.
 
DG

 
Quote    Reply

trenchsol       2/3/2009 7:02:41 AM



I don't think it's the Navies involved that are reluctant to take a hard line, it's the squeamish Western politicians to whom they report and from whom they must take their orders.  And the squeamish politicians are afraid of The Usual Suspects-the wretched "human rights" lawyers and activists who'd scream bloody murder and start lawfare attacks, based on the pirates' "human rights" if the Western warships were to sink pirate ships and attack pirate port havens.



Actually, the "human rights" lawyers have gotten the laws so messed up that any captured pirate brought back to an EU nation automatically is reclassified as a "economic refugee".  So any ships they send either have 'shoot to kill' orders or are just there for show.

Couple more years and captured pirates would be eligible to run for president in the countries that captured them......

DG
 
 
Quote    Reply