NEW: Follow the Editorial Staff on
StrategyPage Twitter Link


GROUND COMBAT +

AIR COMBAT +

NAVAL OPERATIONS +

SPECIAL OPERATIONS +

HUMAN FACTORS +

SPECIAL WEAPONS +

WARFARE BY THE NUMBERS +

LOGISTICS +

TOOLS +


Visit StrategyPage's US Cavalry Store



Murphy's Law Article Index : Current 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
 Latest
 News
 
 Most
 Read
 
 Most
 Commented
 Hot
 Topics

Mommy Goes Marching Off To War

September 13, 2009: One of the biggest problems unit (especially company and battalion) commanders have when preparing to go overseas, is dealing with troops who have family problems. Active duty troops at least have a support system on their base, but reservists have to improvise. However, the troops with the biggest problems, active duty or reservist, are single parents. Nearly eight percent of all military personnel are single parents. Either divorced or never married, most are women (who comprise about 15 percent of military personnel). The army, which has the most people overseas, has to deal with about eleven percent of the troops going, being single parents.

Most of the single parents are able to make arrangements for someone (usually a relative) to take care of the kids. But single parents have some unique problems. For example, if they are divorced, they have an ex-spouse who shares custody, or may still be litigation going on, for more custody. Shipping out for a combat zone, and leaving unsettled legal proceedings, as well as the kids, is not a pleasant experience. Some of these cases turn out badly, with judge ruling against the absent soldier, who often doesn't find this out until she gets back from Iraq or Afghanistan.

There aren't many of these worst-case-situations, but they are considered very newsworthy, and tend to get a lot of media attention. This has led to attempts to pass federal laws to give the deployed troops some protection from aggressive litigation (pushed by a vengeful ex-spouse) directed at them while they are out of the country. The Department of Defense doesn't want these laws, feeling that this would make the situation worse (if only because each state has different child custody and family laws, and the Department of Defense doesn't want to get dragged into all this, along with the Justice Department.)

 

submit to reddit
Send Link to a Friend
Next Article WARPLANES: Predator's Little Russian Brother


Email Me When A New Comment Is Made
Show Only Poster Name and Title     Sort in Reverse Order Posted

blkfoot       9/13/2009 9:08:02 AM
(if only because each state has different child custody and family laws, and the Department of Defense doesn't want to get dragged into all this, along with the Justice Department.)
 
If the Department of Defense really didn't want to get dragged into this then it should have set up restriction of some sort on "married personel" sort of like how it use to have been back a long time ago.
 
Yes, I know it's a All Volinteer Force now, but you look at the Married numbers of Military personal compared to the 1970's and it's unbelievable. Just the strain alone on providing  housing, schools and a support structure for all those families must be a huge percentage of the Department of Defenses Budget, not to mention the destraction put on the Service personal from proforming their job at 100% or just being able to deploy disrupts the units ability to proform at top form (remember for every action that happens to that married service person, it will effect the others in his/ her Unit that will have to take over that persons duties..a real moral killer).
 
When I was in the Marines, you very rarely saw a E-3 and below that was married, or with Children. And if they wanted to get married they were first sent to the Chaplin and seek counciling on the strains they would be putting on their family due to deployments and all the finacial difficulties they would incure just at being a lower ranking/ paid individual (remember your dealing with 17,18,19 and 20 year old people on their first enlistment). Now it's something like every one in five is married. And another way of trying to prevent the lower ranks from getting married was the almost non-availability of Base housing and how hard it was to get BAQ to help suppliment their pay. It wasn't being mean, it was because they signed up in the Marines to be Marines, and that ment being deployed...a lot. The devorce rate of those that did get married was very high. Causing more unnessary strain on a serviceman. All this generally lead to some type of UCMJ action later down the road due to Unauthorized Absentsence, drunk and disorderly, some sort of Civilian Police blotter account...
 
There are those that will argue that's because there wasn't much of a support system in place for those families, but now there is. Ok, How much money is now deverted from new military equipment, better training facilities, better military educational systems better barracks just to provide for Families on bases thats only real function is to take over the food mart at the base PX. What is the percentage of Military personal not at their job because of some family drama that needs to be taken care of first. What is the percentage of Civilian court hearings/ displinary outcomes tieing up the MP's and  for the base Judge advacate to officiate over. Most are very yong spouces, away from mom and dad for the first time and they don't quite fit in with the Military, because they didn't join the Military, they Married into it.
 
Don't get me wrong, I truly believe strongly in the Family and Family unit. Just not in the first enlistment of deployable service personel.
 
Quote    Reply

Dave_in_Pa       9/13/2009 9:33:14 AM
Since 1918, all members of the US Armed Forces on active duty have been protected from being sued, foreclosure on their homes, repossessions of property, etc. by what is now called the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (formerly called the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act).
 
The Armed Forces have for a generation been all volunteer and families tend to promote stability (as well as presenting the problems and issues noted in the article and above comment).  It seems to me only fair and decent for there to also be a federal law providing "...the deployed troops some protection from aggressive litigation (pushed by a vengeful ex-spouse) directed at them while they are out of the country."
 
If America is going to send Servicemen and Women overseas and ask them to put their lives on the line, or even just be away from home for a long time, then America can also give them legal protection to preserve their parental rights and give reservists and Guardsmen access to the same base support services as have Regular troops. 
 
Quote    Reply

kirby1       9/13/2009 12:10:07 PM
Recruiting singles makes sense, and so does demanding that any member wishing to get married must undergo counseling.
 
That being said, the commanders and safety nazis got tired of us single troops getting in trouble. We have a tendency to drink, party, and chase skirts. In the meanwhile, military lobbyists, for lack of a better word, jumped in full gear to give dependents and married troops more benefits and better support. 
 
The married 18 year old gets money to get an apartment, and usually buys a house he can't afford instead. While his single squadmate lives in a shoebox sized dorm room. I'm a six year E-5, the married E-2s make about the same money as I do. I don't mind it if they have kids, but thats alot of dough if he doesn't have kids, and his wife has a nice job as a nurse. 
 
The girls want the free healthcare and a nice chunk of manmeat in uniform. The lower ranks want more pay, and a place off base.  The pressure to get married is intense. I know, I've been engaged twice. When your girl is working a crummy job, worried about not having health insurance, and you're stretching to pay the bills, suddenly wedding bells sound like a solution to your problems.
 
Of greater consequence is intangible differences in treatment that line supervisors give to those who are married. A single who is low on money was odviously irresponsible. Must have been spending all his money on strippers booze and games. A married guy is supporting his family. Never mind that his baby has Baby Nikes and his wife is driving a BMW, but the kitchen cabinets are empty. A single guy has no excuse not to miss work. The married guy had to get his kid dressed for school. Its alright if the married guys wife calls twenty times a day. Its a problem if I get too many calls. I have too many medical appointments. Tims' wife needs to see a doctor about a funny rash. He needs to take her to the doctor. Don't ask me why, they have two cars.  Tims taking leave to spend quality time with his family. I'm taking leave to screw off and party.
 
The Brass saw the married men as less troublesome, compared to us heathen singles. But they didn't figure in the cost of all these babies and bennies, and they didn't figure that many of these young married guys, and girls, would stick to their hard partying tail chasing ways. Theres' still tons of partying and drinking, a whole boatload of infedility on both sides, and now we're running up an 80% divorce rate.
 

 
Quote    Reply

blkfoot       9/13/2009 8:25:36 PM
"The Brass saw the married men as less troublesome, compared to us heathen singles. But they didn't figure in the cost of all these babies and bennies, and they didn't figure that many of these young married guys, and girls, would stick to their hard partying tail chasing ways. Theres' still tons of partying and drinking, a whole boatload of infedility on both sides, and now we're running up an 80% divorce rate."
 
Pretty much exactly what I was trying to say there Kirby1...except I tried to keep it PG rated (stupid me).
 
I pull 10 years in the Marines, was a Sgt (E-5) Plattoon Sgt. A billet for a SSgt, but in the Corps, your always working with 1 or 2 ranks lower than what your TO&E calls for (for a short time I also was a Plt Commander which is a 2nd Lts Billet). I pulled a lot of deployments mainly because:
A) I was experenced,
B) I was Single and
C) I was Single.
Oh, there were other Sgts in my Company, but many were Married...thus to be field expediant, the Single NCO's got nabbed first and then again once they got back we crossed deck to the outgoing deploying Unit. But that was my job, thats why I was in the Corps and thats what I did as a NCO...but my main comment is not the NCO's but the first term enlisted, as you correctly described in your reply above...their just not ready to take on the responcebility of being a deployable active duty Serviceman, and also be a married person in their first couple of years of married life (generally the worst 2 years in a marrage if one spouce is gone a lot and the money is very tight, and the other one left behind is in a new location without family support...and a baby)
 
I'm not expecting DoD to change policy over my comments on Strategypage...but maybe they should think about what perpetual monster they've created by going to the policy they do have.  Mandatory counceling could prevent some of those 80% devorces, give those 18,19 and 20 year olds some time to mature a bit.
 
 
Quote    Reply





New Strategy - Wargames at Discount Prices
1.Modern Air Power: War Over the Middle East
2.Commander: Napoleon at War
3.Close Combat: Watch am Rhein
4.Gallic Wars
5.Fast Action Battle: The Bulge

100+ Computer and Board games all with free shipping.
 
 
 

StrategyWorld.com© 1998 - 2009StrategyWorld.com. All rights Reserved. StrategyWorld.com, StrategyPage.com, FYEO, For Your Eyes Only and Al Nofi's CIC are all trademarks of StrategyWorld.com Privacy Policy